From unknown Sat Sep 06 21:07:48 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#20471: Emacs ceased to respond to C-g on a tty; SIGINT became blocked? Resent-From: Ivan Shmakov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 15:31:05 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 20471 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 20471@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: submit@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.14304078635243 (code B ref -1); Thu, 30 Apr 2015 15:31:05 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Apr 2015 15:31:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57716 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YnqQU-0001MI-3g for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 11:31:02 -0400 Received: from fely.am-1.org ([78.47.74.50]:41910) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YnqQN-0001Ly-2x for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 11:30:55 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=siamics.net; s=a2013295; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Sender:Subject:To:From; bh=ueqmSY4IqebJO0ViU+a4vuUnHqKb+6RoBh3AVqxMRS0=; b=dKr8coIkUL7eBtA7rfIQPRvk+c9RmeC5qT5TgpoBKrPwIjItrhyRTMUtcEGbzMuLnDdYD3rgvNuSvYO55CdpdnkpaFGNuUoj051tvyQKZKYQelh4Ua6SHzGtW1TO61pJQ42OZjgKoHvvrIoPVi5Et/ePgW32bsWO5ZKS9Ced4vE=; Received: from [2a02:2560:6d4:26ca::1:1d] (helo=violet.siamics.net) by fely.am-1.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YnqQK-0004Ca-QW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 15:30:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=violet.siamics.net) by violet.siamics.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YnqQB-0000u9-58 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 22:30:39 +0700 From: Ivan Shmakov Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 15:30:38 +0000 Message-ID: <87bni5pra9.fsf@violet.siamics.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) Package: emacs After some unfortunate interaction with a process (or perhaps a network connection), one of my Emacs instances (built from Git; 1c7f0cdc4c1f, 2015-04-27 16:59:11 UTC) ceased to respond to C-g on a tty. Attaching GDB to it shows no signals being delivered on C-g, which (AIUI) hints at either SIGINT being blocked /or/ C-g =E2=80=9Cunbound=E2=80=9D from the signal via terminal settings. I=E2=80= =99ve copied the latter from a terminal used by a properly working Emacs instance with the stty(1) invocation below, yet I still see no signals via GDB, which leaves the signal mask as the only point of failure that I can think of. $ stty -F /dev/pts/non-working "$(stty -gF /dev/pts/working)"=20 Any suggestion on how do I debug this issue any further? TIA. --=20 FSF associate member #7257 np. Dance of Death =E2=80=94 Iron Maiden =E2=80= =A6 B6A0 230E 334A From unknown Sat Sep 06 21:07:48 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#20471: Emacs ceased to respond to C-g on a tty; SIGINT became blocked? Resent-From: Andreas Schwab Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 16:01:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20471 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ivan Shmakov Cc: 20471@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 20471-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20471.143040962313675 (code B ref 20471); Thu, 30 Apr 2015 16:01:03 +0000 Received: (at 20471) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Apr 2015 16:00:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57736 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Ynqsv-0003YB-Vk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 12:00:23 -0400 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.9]:50712) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Ynqsq-0003XV-TK for 20471@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 12:00:18 -0400 Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ld1d54C0Cz3hjZd; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 18:00:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.68]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ld1d52M4tzvh24; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 18:00:09 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.68]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wwYCuWJMIFZt; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 18:00:05 +0200 (CEST) X-Auth-Info: lQfUrKxHts+z9AWWPkCI1UVw5+lKknIn4ce87Dqwj7Rz9hRk+fekSl0dFayVINZZ Received: from igel.home (ppp-93-104-94-204.dynamic.mnet-online.de [93.104.94.204]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 18:00:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 264232C30C5; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 18:00:05 +0200 (CEST) From: Andreas Schwab References: <87bni5pra9.fsf@violet.siamics.net> X-Yow: I know th'MAMBO!! I have a TWO-TONE CHEMISTRY SET!! Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 18:00:05 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87bni5pra9.fsf@violet.siamics.net> (Ivan Shmakov's message of "Thu, 30 Apr 2015 15:30:38 +0000") Message-ID: <87h9rxhaii.fsf@igel.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Ivan Shmakov writes: > Attaching GDB to it shows no signals being delivered on C-g, > which (AIUI) hints at either SIGINT being blocked /or/ C-g > “unbound” from the signal via terminal settings. I’ve copied > the latter from a terminal used by a properly working Emacs > instance with the stty(1) invocation below, yet I still see no > signals via GDB, which leaves the signal mask as the only point > of failure that I can think of. A blocked signal would still be visible in the debugger (assuming you haven't changed the handling of SIGINT in gdb). Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different." From unknown Sat Sep 06 21:07:48 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#20471: Emacs ceased to respond to C-g on a tty; SIGINT became blocked? Resent-From: Ivan Shmakov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 15:57:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20471 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 20471@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 20471-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20471.143075496316365 (code B ref 20471); Mon, 04 May 2015 15:57:01 +0000 Received: (at 20471) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 May 2015 15:56:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33908 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YpIiw-0004Fs-NS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 May 2015 11:56:03 -0400 Received: from fely.am-1.org ([78.47.74.50]:42417) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YpIit-0004FR-R2 for 20471@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 May 2015 11:56:00 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=siamics.net; s=a2013295; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:Sender:References:Subject:To:From; bh=cfT94zEJDjl4JRNCIyw5ZT1FJOJNqbPL2TYzwmR7pLI=; b=H8p1RIiLeJFnWW7kUn6sdGsrY1M4aRaMKtun4MH5GwygHO1HuAKUsMOoEyFAmZdZvLlA4JVuohtb0X3IVNU99hRgDbqCtsRbqmRwh7QzpF7DaFyGrbsfsWwp7ExMDjhGLK/gvfdvrc/w18Pisb17KPr+jiaAHDGkDbnVYo+ve+0=; Received: from [2a02:2560:6d4:26ca::1:1d] (helo=violet.siamics.net) by fely.am-1.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YpIiq-000528-Jg for 20471@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 May 2015 15:55:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=violet.siamics.net) by violet.siamics.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YpIij-0004kt-Nx for 20471@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 May 2015 22:55:49 +0700 From: Ivan Shmakov References: <87bni5pra9.fsf@violet.siamics.net> <87h9rxhaii.fsf@igel.home> Mail-Followup-To: 20471@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 15:55:48 +0000 In-Reply-To: <87h9rxhaii.fsf@igel.home> (Andreas Schwab's message of "Thu, 30 Apr 2015 18:00:05 +0200") Message-ID: <87fv7cmj5n.fsf@violet.siamics.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >>>>> Andreas Schwab writes: >>>>> Ivan Shmakov writes: >> Attaching GDB to it shows no signals being delivered on C-g, which >> (AIUI) hints at either SIGINT being blocked /or/ C-g =E2=80=9Cunbound= =E2=80=9D from >> the signal via terminal settings. I=E2=80=99ve copied the latter from a >> terminal used by a properly working Emacs instance with the stty(1) >> invocation below, yet I still see no signals via GDB, which leaves >> the signal mask as the only point of failure that I can think of. >> Any suggestion on how do I debug this issue any further? > A blocked signal would still be visible in the debugger It=E2=80=99s not what I observe. Why, SIGINT seem to be ignored by GDB itself when it=E2=80=99s attached to that Emacs instance. > (assuming you haven't changed the handling of SIGINT in gdb). I didn=E2=80=99t. (gdb) info signals=20 Signal Stop Print Pass to program Description SIGHUP Yes Yes Yes Hangup SIGINT Yes Yes No Interrupt SIGQUIT Yes Yes Yes Quit =E2=80=A6 Just in case, the ps(1) output for two of my Emacs instances goes below. The GDB =E2=80=98bt=E2=80=99 output at SIGCONT time (after a properly handled C-z) is MIMEd, too. To note is that I=E2=80=99ve tried to set a breakpoint on the next line of internal_catch (), but it doesn=E2=80=99t seem to ever be triggered. Could it hint at some non-local exit issue, perhaps? $ ps -o pid,pending,blocked,ignored,caught,stat,bsdtime,command \ -C emacs24 -C emacs25=20 PID PENDING BLOCKED IGNORED CAUGHT STAT TIME COMMAND 19987 00000000 00000000 14001000 Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 16:11:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20471 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ivan Shmakov Cc: 20471@debbugs.gnu.org Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Received: via spool by 20471-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20471.143075584923302 (code B ref 20471); Mon, 04 May 2015 16:11:02 +0000 Received: (at 20471) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 May 2015 16:10:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33914 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YpIxE-00063k-7X for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 May 2015 12:10:48 -0400 Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:51000) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YpIxB-00063Q-6T for 20471@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 May 2015 12:10:46 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NNU00L0021LGC00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 20471@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 May 2015 19:09:36 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NNU00LKF2803VA0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Mon, 04 May 2015 19:09:36 +0300 (IDT) Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 19:09:39 +0300 From: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: <87fv7cmj5n.fsf@violet.siamics.net> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il Message-id: <83zj5ks4sc.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT References: <87bni5pra9.fsf@violet.siamics.net> <87h9rxhaii.fsf@igel.home> <87fv7cmj5n.fsf@violet.siamics.net> X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) > From: Ivan Shmakov > Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 15:55:48 +0000 > > >>>>> Andreas Schwab writes: > >>>>> Ivan Shmakov writes: > > >> Attaching GDB to it shows no signals being delivered on C-g, which > >> (AIUI) hints at either SIGINT being blocked /or/ C-g “unbound” from > >> the signal via terminal settings. I’ve copied the latter from a > >> terminal used by a properly working Emacs instance with the stty(1) > >> invocation below, yet I still see no signals via GDB, which leaves > >> the signal mask as the only point of failure that I can think of. > > >> Any suggestion on how do I debug this issue any further? > > > A blocked signal would still be visible in the debugger > > It’s not what I observe. Why, SIGINT seem to be ignored by GDB > itself when it’s attached to that Emacs instance. > > > (assuming you haven't changed the handling of SIGINT in gdb). Is this on a TTY frame? If not, then C-g doesn't trigger a SIGINT in Emacs. From unknown Sat Sep 06 21:07:48 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#20471: Emacs ceased to respond to C-g on a tty; SIGINT became blocked? Resent-From: Ivan Shmakov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 16:21:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20471 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 20471@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 20471-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20471.143075643824284 (code B ref 20471); Mon, 04 May 2015 16:21:03 +0000 Received: (at 20471) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 May 2015 16:20:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33935 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YpJ6j-0006Jb-8D for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 May 2015 12:20:37 -0400 Received: from fely.am-1.org ([78.47.74.50]:42421) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YpJ6g-0006JT-CK for 20471@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 May 2015 12:20:35 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=siamics.net; s=a2013295; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:Sender:References:Subject:To:From; bh=vOpkrKO5rwzmuyTGBQbp3YnJ+vQFms2ktei0l8ylxfk=; b=KqxvflsuG0vVe0WNbA+xvwcFXFbe2EVyMs7orFVzCPxVLBa36tVWMx49SdYpzkbnWWpLAkVvitC6fCLkbbtJSGAKWPYZAUIMXKsjEdWvzYMnWtUIrDtWWyyEQpj6VR3khkYVKd3OYdTicjEPNu+lZen6e1XV2g3WxweQW7S9sR0=; Received: from [2a02:2560:6d4:26ca::1:1d] (helo=violet.siamics.net) by fely.am-1.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YpJ6f-0005DY-MC for 20471@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 May 2015 16:20:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=violet.siamics.net) by violet.siamics.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YpJ6Y-0004ni-UB for 20471@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 May 2015 23:20:27 +0700 From: Ivan Shmakov References: <87bni5pra9.fsf@violet.siamics.net> <87h9rxhaii.fsf@igel.home> <87fv7cmj5n.fsf@violet.siamics.net> <83zj5ks4sc.fsf@gnu.org> Mail-Followup-To: 20471@debbugs.gnu.orge Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 16:20:26 +0000 In-Reply-To: <83zj5ks4sc.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 04 May 2015 19:09:39 +0300") Message-ID: <877fsomi0l.fsf@violet.siamics.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) >>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes: >>>>> From: Ivan Shmakov Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 15:55:48 +0000 >>>>> Andreas Schwab writes: [=E2=80=A6] >>> A blocked signal would still be visible in the debugger >> It=E2=80=99s not what I observe. Why, SIGINT seem to be ignored by GDB >> itself when it=E2=80=99s attached to that Emacs instance. >>> (assuming you haven't changed the handling of SIGINT in gdb). > Is this on a TTY frame? Yes. FWIW, I use non-tty Emacs frames only occasionally. > If not, then C-g doesn't trigger a SIGINT in Emacs. Yes. (I=E2=80=99ve already read that part in keyboard.c.) PS. GNU Screen is just so welcoming an environment I can=E2=80=99t give it= up easily. --=20 FSF associate member #7257 http://am-1.org/~ivan/ =E2=80=A6 3013 B6A0= 230E 334A From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 04 03:24:33 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Sep 2021 07:24:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46376 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mMQ2T-0002YF-87 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Sep 2021 03:24:33 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:38400) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mMQ2R-0002Xn-Lu for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Sep 2021 03:24:32 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Fj6GK28HCdY+y4ZHtKh9OXE81N+342M5fOzRutUM1QY=; b=m7m2mYES3bo8yTwspSIfNeY+N2 VjCL88+irNYx2YOVTnA6lAiWzC/91XYyLlMT8Ed38/t17psES4HCI2ZHMPwE1kpM2yhE160D04gua mm9ag0Bu1yVetVfxR9NkY4SEmuhcdobgn4g9btpc0F10ModjOOC5kVFqS7uhKiAwIzvg=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mMQ2J-0006dz-Tx for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Sep 2021 09:24:25 +0200 Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2021 09:24:23 +0200 Message-Id: <87k0jwst08.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #20471 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 20471 + moreinfo quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) tags 20471 + moreinfo quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 03 05:44:08 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Oct 2021 09:44:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32850 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mWy2S-0003D7-IK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Oct 2021 05:44:08 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:46174) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mWy2R-0003CJ-CB for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Oct 2021 05:44:07 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=15W6P0zHvWTDM5VizTq8IIJ4fjSVUuhM4qPGAyJQBS4=; b=GYwCeCw/9i02RFcU3I4vG2gZzo 2HkNbMrcpFsMvQ64GQjv6w/GlSW7sQyT3Fxyyb5+3TOKxMuxFtqSCOfFtN4BbUGIeR34Y++VwscFB mFAy0Uhh5T+0CuekBvrYkl9XYxHt/+jzWaTAD5nkJlww5vE1AdfXh943heHONtKUk5PM=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mWy2J-0005OR-To for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Oct 2021 11:44:01 +0200 Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2021 11:43:59 +0200 Message-Id: <875yuesasg.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #20471 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 20471 - moreinfo quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) tags 20471 - moreinfo quit From unknown Sat Sep 06 21:07:48 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#20471: Emacs ceased to respond to C-g on a tty; SIGINT became blocked? Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 02 May 2022 09:53:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20471 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ivan Shmakov Cc: 20471@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 20471-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20471.16514851319851 (code B ref 20471); Mon, 02 May 2022 09:53:02 +0000 Received: (at 20471) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 May 2022 09:52:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34904 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nlSiw-0002Yp-SZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 May 2022 05:52:11 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:41226) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nlSiu-0002YM-Li for 20471@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 May 2022 05:52:09 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=7fVCLICzvU5gYkA/BdQY5ZkIuJkG9Lr5YlCJBT241zA=; b=TpwKFsBnN83iuIscX8JYtS0sV2 t5pRApaBnWT4+tJaHBQSrAdMDDUe2PolcIczUH+6NVg1YbbR15weRocV0L11iKnE9CWvRWaAgJ0EH TDdKnxkUzZWvQu6W3w6OQ1NB2R1FH2bMfmkvebJkhFZEyTpntdPVxC9JlTPQqAjNjcS4=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nlSii-0007hU-3o; Mon, 02 May 2022 11:51:58 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <87bni5pra9.fsf@violet.siamics.net> X-Now-Playing: Pet Shop Boys's _Inner Sanctum (1)_: "Love Is A Bourgeois Construct" Date: Mon, 02 May 2022 11:51:55 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87bni5pra9.fsf@violet.siamics.net> (Ivan Shmakov's message of "Thu, 30 Apr 2015 15:30:38 +0000") Message-ID: <87k0b42res.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Ivan Shmakov writes: > After some unfortunate interaction with a process (or perhaps a > network connection), one of my Emacs instances (built from Git; > 1c7f0cdc4c1f, 2015-04-27 16:59:11 UTC) ceased to respond to C-g > [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Ivan Shmakov writes: > After some unfortunate interaction with a process (or perhaps a > network connection), one of my Emacs instances (built from Git; > 1c7f0cdc4c1f, 2015-04-27 16:59:11 UTC) ceased to respond to C-g > on a tty. (I'm going through old bug reports that unfortunately weren't resolved at the time.) Are you still seeing this issue in recent Emacs versions? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 02 05:52:09 2022 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 May 2022 09:52:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34902 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nlSiv-0002Yb-No for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 May 2022 05:52:09 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:41230) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nlSiu-0002YN-NB for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 May 2022 05:52:09 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Fj6GK28HCdY+y4ZHtKh9OXE81N+342M5fOzRutUM1QY=; b=DFG12o1QwxyELrpG6HnYuPdhZv ZhEI+bGBliWmHrO3uSp6A/DAgnaKhHj8jSG4bKiNTsd6KlNJ13IUbvyngXAXJKSypi/JRhIkkvcM0 cDlzIPcNuD04d5wBg9J7bw8UskWClOjBNmNZWxQEQL5gpNlS/L9g9ajJS3ucjs2GjUWE=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nlSin-0007hZ-52 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 May 2022 11:52:03 +0200 Date: Mon, 02 May 2022 11:52:00 +0200 Message-Id: <87ilqo2ren.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #20471 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 20471 + moreinfo quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) tags 20471 + moreinfo quit From unknown Sat Sep 06 21:07:48 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#20471: Emacs ceased to respond to C-g on a tty; SIGINT became blocked? Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 18:08:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20471 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo To: Ivan Shmakov Cc: 20471@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 20471-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20471.165393404015103 (code B ref 20471); Mon, 30 May 2022 18:08:02 +0000 Received: (at 20471) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 May 2022 18:07:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46016 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nvjnU-0003vV-IJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2022 14:07:20 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:48276) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nvjnQ-0003uy-Eb for 20471@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2022 14:07:18 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=2m6JVcCnXZWzAm0D3S0e4M/b2xT8DA34kR78kacc1CE=; b=TwaegDgDzAdVgdFoL2VqbMfDzS tZrKrqpJQ1So5sK9sIiLsukzGTTKAanqQrLRgOFcvH/mxQs0ySsEK81u6pT85yUYRGe5tz2Knv0Il NDUxOyAsZlOcvuMFy97KD66MSPmQYMRKxX4mEaNinwSX1xWiJzu5GOkRT1GfWOdZoFyk=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nvjnC-0008MH-Cz; Mon, 30 May 2022 20:07:04 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <87bni5pra9.fsf@violet.siamics.net> <87k0b42res.fsf@gnus.org> X-Now-Playing: Exec's _Advertise Here_: "(I'm After) Your Best Interest" Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 20:06:59 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87k0b42res.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 02 May 2022 11:51:55 +0200") Message-ID: <87wne2ao8s.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Are you still seeing this issue in recent Emacs versions? More information was requested, but no response was given within a month, so I'm closing this bug report. If the problem still exists, please respond to this email and we'll reopen the bug report. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Are you still seeing this issue in recent Emacs versions? More information was requested, but no response was given within a month, so I'm closing this bug report. If the problem still exists, please respond to this email and we'll reopen the bug report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 30 14:07:21 2022 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 May 2022 18:07:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46018 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nvjnU-0003vX-OO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2022 14:07:20 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:48274) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nvjnP-0003uw-Lv for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2022 14:07:19 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=lpwAheWWBfjyMvo5qJThXyH0QxKXgO4uf2mmwG/ovZg=; b=ii6sOlCvtJbCrrywnF11k8p6C0 x86nGlv6tcpaKZNxrcNtsB5JU9cLXN0TYapr6WXYWlvJ1YURCYP6rqI1niqNC5+Y24hQzeix2fb0R rNPqV1ViImrocvcm/ddDJEcxKk9XLDaOHJl0+/te/E3RLP9bc4VY4TqP075qxU6+6Ofk=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nvjnH-0008MR-AX for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2022 20:07:09 +0200 Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 20:07:06 +0200 Message-Id: <87v8tmao8l.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #20471 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 20471 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) close 20471 quit From unknown Sat Sep 06 21:07:48 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#20471: Emacs ceased to respond to C-g on a tty; SIGINT became blocked? Resent-From: Ivan Shmakov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2022 05:22:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20471 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo To: 20471@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 20471-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20471.16541472705075 (code B ref 20471); Thu, 02 Jun 2022 05:22:02 +0000 Received: (at 20471) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jun 2022 05:21:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52385 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nwdGg-0001Jn-BS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2022 01:21:10 -0400 Received: from wata.am-1.org ([46.235.224.96]:49340) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nwdGb-0001JX-SW for 20471@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2022 01:21:09 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=siamics.net ; s=a2021230; h=License:In-Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Cc: Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=xoHhhKJ6jvMKfjPH1DcPW7nzcmnZrbrRExzMCFzgBng=; b=y3zdnDMyKDJAuhge3Dna3EqwcD dgKFmPjdhDUkEBd7KluJn33hOuiwy8KfWPXpenpwHxftxODyuFEHlCQ2LltWrfBB2i31/Znqzh9eH v/uJXjNox41PiF2vJDRmtzajKT+JlboFNxfE6FU4iiicCBYluDX9aFinaaNX2AZGaUx8N98Mtaqqy W8iFqARX4LXkv2u/w6bBkEQSgtg4RT+YMFfzwnqABU13jb/zAg/gm8zvT/of2vSmCU2cCt8XmZaBL 9K75LSYnbDdChV4ryKa5pFiIvcb3pCJn5g64YWQqMZa8mGPkzY4gYW9Gs8SWmAIe+aaQyrlrEU5i1 4wGjBorQ==; Received: from [2001:470:1f13:1eb::1:1d] (helo=violet.siamics.net) by wata.am-1.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nwdGa-0004bd-CA for 20471@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2022 05:21:04 +0000 Received: from ivan by violet.siamics.net with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nwdGK-0006k5-1h for 20471@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2022 05:20:48 +0000 Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2022 05:20:47 +0000 From: Ivan Shmakov Message-ID: <20220602052047.g6fidkxbbqoetukf@violet.siamics.net> Mail-Followup-To: 20471@debbugs.gnu.org References: <87bni5pra9.fsf@violet.siamics.net> <87k0b42res.fsf@gnus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87k0b42res.fsf@gnus.org> License: CC0-1.0 (original contributions only) X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) >>>>> On 2022-05-02, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: >>>>> IS == Ivan Shmakov wrote: > (I’m going through old bug reports that unfortunately weren’t resolved > at the time.) > Are you still seeing this issue in recent Emacs versions? I haven’t put Emacs to much use in a couple of years, so that’d be a no. I cannot readily recall which versions I’ve had this bug on, but while very rare (perhaps only happening once in a few weeks), I’m pretty certain I’ve encountered it more than once. IS> After some unfortunate interaction with a process (or perhaps a IS> network connection), one of my Emacs instances (built from Git; IS> 1c7f0cdc4c1f, 2015-04-27 16:59:11 UTC) ceased to respond to C-g IS> on a tty. IS> Attaching GDB to it shows no signals being delivered on C-g, IS> which (AIUI) hints at either SIGINT being blocked /or/ C-g IS> “unbound” from the signal via terminal settings. IS> $ ps -o pid,pending,blocked,ignored,caught,stat,bsdtime,command \ IS> -C emacs24 -C emacs25 IS> PID PENDING BLOCKED IGNORED CAUGHT STAT TIME COMMAND IS> 19987 00000000 00000000 14001000 25806 00000002 04002006 04001000 $ AIUI, bit 1 set (as in, ‘0 != (mask & 2)’) in the ‘blocked’ mask above suggests that signal 2 (SIGINT) was indeed blocked. Ditto for ‘pending.’ -- FSF associate member #7257 np. AUTOEXEC.BAT — Master Boot Record From unknown Sat Sep 06 21:07:48 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#20471: Emacs ceased to respond to C-g on a tty; SIGINT became blocked? Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2022 09:20:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20471 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo To: 20471@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 20471-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20471.165416157031276 (code B ref 20471); Thu, 02 Jun 2022 09:20:01 +0000 Received: (at 20471) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jun 2022 09:19:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52791 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nwgzK-00088N-5p for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2022 05:19:30 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:48638) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nwgzI-000887-Kd for 20471@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2022 05:19:29 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID :In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=1dscxG1VNJYzdgeo9Y5TXxLFb/0HIniOfpUNZA1vd1w=; b=uvLA//g10u6EDMIzCBQltxF/p7 Bzw80uybABBFiCcQ7ZV9UOXbM+tKqkDXqU4BaRKF+wj+1yrPAD2wuKkKvpMcs8WjJz2+8VhCmz1Mn jbeaD7Rhp/iRxl3rj99j/zmZsfbrIqdT6+c9BuILzO/CvXS0MmeAa27yhEZDsFwesc74=; Received: from 109.179.87.109.tmi.telenormobil.no ([109.179.87.109] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nwgzA-0005Ni-4r for 20471@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2022 11:19:22 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <87bni5pra9.fsf@violet.siamics.net> <87k0b42res.fsf@gnus.org> <20220602052047.g6fidkxbbqoetukf@violet.siamics.net> Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2022 11:19:19 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20220602052047.g6fidkxbbqoetukf@violet.siamics.net> (Ivan Shmakov's message of "Thu, 2 Jun 2022 05:20:47 +0000") Message-ID: <87leuf1kyw.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Ivan Shmakov writes: > I =?UTF-8?Q?haven=E2=80=99t?= put Emacs to much use in a couple of years, so =?UTF-8?Q?that=E2=80=99d?= > be a no. I cannot readily recall which versions =?UTF-8?Q?I=E2=80=99ve?= had this > bug on, but while very rare (perhaps only happening once in a [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Ivan Shmakov writes: > I haven=E2=80=99t put Emacs to much use in a couple of years, so that=E2= =80=99d > be a no. I cannot readily recall which versions I=E2=80=99ve had this > bug on, but while very rare (perhaps only happening once in a few > weeks), I=E2=80=99m pretty certain I=E2=80=99ve encountered it more than= once. OK; I'm closing this bug report, then. --=20 (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no