GNU bug report logs - #20437
ls links too many dynamic libraries

Previous Next

Package: coreutils;

Reported by: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>

Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 05:31:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: notabug

Done: Pádraig Brady <P <at> draigBrady.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Bernhard Voelker <mail <at> bernhard-voelker.de>
To: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>, 20437 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#20437: ls links too many dynamic libraries
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 08:40:13 +0200
On 04/27/2015 07:30 AM, Paul Eggert wrote:
> --- a/bootstrap.conf
> +++ b/bootstrap.conf

...

> @@ -318,9 +319,9 @@ gnulib_tool_option_extras="--tests-base=gnulib-tests --with-tests --symlink\
>  buildreq="\
>  autoconf   2.64
>  automake   1.11.2
> -autopoint  -
> +autopoint  0.19.4
>  bison      -
> -gettext    0.18.1
> +gettext    0.19.4
>  git        1.4.4
>  gperf      -
>  gzip       -

This gnulib update seems to bump the prerequisites for building
coreutils quite high - at least on a current openSUSE-13.2 system
building now fails:

./bootstrap
./bootstrap: Error: 'autopoint' version == 0.19.2 is too old
./bootstrap:        'autopoint' version >= 0.19.4 is required
./bootstrap: Error: 'gettext' version == 0.19.2 is too old
./bootstrap:        'gettext' version >= 0.19.4 is required

I know that we tend to use the newest gear, but IIRC from last time
we agreed on supporting at least the latest stable version of the
bigger distros to ease providing patches for regular (advanced) users.
What especially does gnulib need from 0.19.4?  Could we work around
it?

Thanks & have a nice day,
Berny






This bug report was last modified 10 years and 111 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.