From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Apr 24 00:30:13 2015 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Apr 2015 04:30:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38182 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YlVFk-00007b-KD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 00:30:13 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41627) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YlVFi-00007B-EX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 00:30:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YlVFc-0003PC-D9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 00:30:05 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:35365) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YlVFc-0003Og-BA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 00:30:04 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55123) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YlVFb-0005Dj-5G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 00:30:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YlVFW-0003JG-70 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 00:30:03 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x235.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::235]:34185) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YlVFW-0003Iu-0S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 00:29:58 -0400 Received: by wicmx19 with SMTP id mx19so26208258wic.1 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 21:29:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=tYLMserJulqCdrNyYYgXxDmExGfSasPqyTFEKK9Vb58=; b=iCgeUuR3fu0UkPFAkHdHNrW1PWNY7wUKRLZEVRxqmDFMS1R65uLQvuHk4D+/2WRI+Z uegvGDqMsqsa0Ji260RzeTk16pthWiww1dW3IWmW+W6xt5xeM1/QWilTxMHrZJYYnQwc EJPQB+16DqIE0ruxiftC5PTlhabKtc3ZiesligZjXTH1qlkIGl9mtLFzUfiAfWZIjIjA 9Rcuk5E6XmQc6BwOThqSARptuba5Rx8GmKn/eQUSawH0+uDL29agn2SfqIi7t0k81pe0 cSSKjjNkJgK8Is37q/I8uQcbddSjbmwz2yuOmleHOY/McXy2faoG5GQJfbqF8udwphV5 BcjQ== X-Received: by 10.180.105.227 with SMTP id gp3mr174576wib.56.1429849796219; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 21:29:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lenovog410 ([117.201.95.5]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id gs7sm1783563wib.10.2015.04.23.21.29.51 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 23 Apr 2015 21:29:53 -0700 (PDT) From: vibhavp@gmail.com To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 24.5; CEDET: Semantic doesn't complete anonymous union members Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 09:59:47 +0530 Message-ID: <87egna87yc.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) For this struct: struct s { int a; union { char *str; void *ptr; }; }; The members listed in completion will only be 'a', instead of 'a', 'str' and 'ptr'. This bug is also present in the current development version. -- Vibhav Pant vibhavp@gmail.com From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Dec 03 06:33:11 2020 Received: (at 20415) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Dec 2020 11:33:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38686 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kkmrH-0002FM-LQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 06:33:11 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:45150) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kkmrG-0002F7-Ir for 20415@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 06:33:11 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=NJr3cckoS/w83si5s+ssns67CxVaFkuvUwWaruVnYt0=; b=M8wnbPLaFfUvD3/6RYV9QABRHK 2RCHq/OZGorv9SDyXPt6h0D5ynxzWq365QdZkV110I2UuWz88JoKUc8dzQv2gUIOYwLxgzjKinzvJ eV0lfe+K7cZtzZYKzrBYPKgtOy7aYC6WA8xLHbbxOw21s+2ON7rS6oDIUo3u/wjNRb9k=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kkmr8-0002tK-8J; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 12:33:04 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: vibhavp@gmail.com Subject: Re: bug#20415: 24.5; CEDET: Semantic doesn't complete anonymous union members References: <87egna87yc.fsf@gmail.com> X-Now-Playing: Old's _Formula_: "Thug" Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2020 12:33:01 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87egna87yc.fsf@gmail.com> (vibhavp@gmail.com's message of "Fri, 24 Apr 2015 09:59:47 +0530") Message-ID: <87pn3rruoi.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: vibhavp@gmail.com writes: > For this struct: > struct s { > int a; > union { > char *str; > void *ptr; > }; > }; > > The members listed in completion will only be 'a', instead of 'a', 'str' > and 'ptr'. This bug is also presen [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 20415 Cc: 20415@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) vibhavp@gmail.com writes: > For this struct: > struct s { > int a; > union { > char *str; > void *ptr; > }; > }; > > The members listed in completion will only be 'a', instead of 'a', 'str' > and 'ptr'. This bug is also present in the current development version. (This bug report unfortunately got no response at the time.) Is this problem still present in more recent Emacs versions? If so, could you provide a recipe to reproduce the bug, starting from "emacs -Q"? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Dec 03 06:33:19 2020 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Dec 2020 11:33:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38689 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kkmrO-0002Ff-RL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 06:33:19 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:45164) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kkmrM-0002FL-M7 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 06:33:17 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=KmK4BR4m9pWJPLEnrWNO8xv0EyHjFeNw8LsMt65qg+A=; b=R80m2BtM8Fe3545e6PlvPw03B0 IvIWaIfaEsI+BkN6P3t3bsZmlU62C4ajqVxOoplcxpSoyRZ/oY0qu28O7RWbqPSuusigkZ/d/3/lY o9QUV4GxBRT8tbHK7fpTSCj0uZ1HgdIsSDtuKGqw/yCZ4khkTNZJE36UOYiM6vVZGp1w=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kkmrE-0002tY-W6 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 12:33:11 +0100 Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2020 12:33:07 +0100 Message-Id: <87o8jbruoc.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #20415 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 20415 + moreinfo quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 20415 + moreinfo quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 19 12:54:07 2021 Received: (at 20415) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Jan 2021 17:54:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51536 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l1vCh-0002LD-DE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 12:54:07 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:34058) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l1vCf-0002K5-Qn for 20415@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 12:54:06 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=P3CWFkE4yHMKS0frZGbDGT6SVzDbZELx8eVV5QFnRDU=; b=cJjmZ9jBCONCJ1/NCdO0jiz92n 8mXUrU/VirJLAbIDb3+3QXK8U/KkSCp7UocDJoUm4uhVhSiRv/o1dLldBkxb1NALRINS42no1HLnD kX9fju7Dg9ejWIu7Rg1WjiWQzlT4lUZ/8+sBoSK+3ykTotDltu3WEPR/6A0/omDsFlm8=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l1vCX-0002l2-Kn; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 18:53:59 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: vibhavp@gmail.com Subject: Re: bug#20415: 24.5; CEDET: Semantic doesn't complete anonymous union members References: <87egna87yc.fsf@gmail.com> <87pn3rruoi.fsf@gnus.org> X-Now-Playing: Ultra =?utf-8?Q?Nat=C3=A9's?= _Blue Notes in the Basement_: "You & Me Together" Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 18:53:56 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87pn3rruoi.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu, 03 Dec 2020 12:33:01 +0100") Message-ID: <87czy0hky3.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Is this problem still present in more recent Emacs versions? If so, > could you provide a recipe to reproduce the bug, starting from "emacs -Q"? More information was requested, but no response was given within a month, so I'm closing this bug report. If the problem still exists, please respond to this email and we'll reopen the bug report. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 20415 Cc: 20415@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Is this problem still present in more recent Emacs versions? If so, > could you provide a recipe to reproduce the bug, starting from "emacs -Q"? More information was requested, but no response was given within a month, so I'm closing this bug report. If the problem still exists, please respond to this email and we'll reopen the bug report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 19 12:54:14 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Jan 2021 17:54:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51539 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l1vCo-0002LZ-Mh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 12:54:14 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:34094) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l1vCn-0002LL-AS for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 12:54:13 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=pSpClZ+aE4hMufI7Y78H8ScwoRiBLfrBSmN6211CtbE=; b=l1uEjQAYNuYKLPLjwYpVuzx7lU FZmsaB3JIQhl5fKag/pfNXWP2tHQxSA/g8GSuC/CvRuoGrVTgStuXTVzfhecHlPT7Y+6OjcMUMb80 coRAFVT1R02nv87/tdK1RgopyaGZITe+aUkj6CXHWPaJrgMHgbNLyTD4Uw1VmHMQcNiM=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l1vCe-0002lD-QF for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 18:54:07 +0100 Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 18:54:03 +0100 Message-Id: <87bldkhkxw.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #20415 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 20415 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) close 20415 quit From unknown Sun Aug 10 00:25:34 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 12:24:06 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator