GNU bug report logs - #20411
24.3; Docstring of `next-single-property-change'

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Eli Barzilay <eli <at> barzilay.org>

Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 14:09:01 UTC

Severity: minor

Found in version 24.3

Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Eli Barzilay <eli <at> barzilay.org>
Subject: bug#20411: closed (Re: bug#20411: 24.3; Docstring of
 `next-single-property-change')
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 08:29:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report

#20411: 24.3; Docstring of `next-single-property-change'

which was filed against the emacs package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 20411 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
20411: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=20411
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Eli Barzilay <eli <at> barzilay.org>
Cc: 20411-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#20411: 24.3; Docstring of `next-single-property-change'
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 11:28:16 +0300
> Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 16:29:55 -0400
> From: Eli Barzilay <eli <at> barzilay.org>
> Cc: 20411 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> So I still think that it's confusing -- maybe "except when LIMIT is
> non-nil" and possibly a warning that this is different from the
> searching functions?

Thanks, I clarified the doc strings of this and similar functions in
this respect.

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Eli Barzilay <eli <at> barzilay.org>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 24.3; Docstring of `next-single-property-change'
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 10:08:01 -0400
The documentation for `next-single-property-change' has:

  Return nil if the property is constant all the way to the end of
  object.  If the value is non-nil, it is a position greater than
  position, never equal.

Both of these are wrong when a bound is given.

-- 
          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
                    http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!



This bug report was last modified 10 years and 86 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.