GNU bug report logs - #20375
doc. error in v 2.0.11, Section 7.6.2.5

Previous Next

Package: guile;

Reported by: Matt Wette <mwette <at> alumni.caltech.edu>

Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 02:22:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Andy Wingo <wingo <at> pobox.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Matt Wette <mwette <at> alumni.caltech.edu>
To: bug-guile <at> gnu.org
Cc: mwette <at> alumni.caltech.edu
Subject: doc. error in v 2.0.11, Section 7.6.2.5
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 19:20:57 -0700
The reference manual for guile 2.0.11 has an error in  Section 7.6.2.5 on rnrs lists.  The statement "identical to the fold ..." is not quite correct.  The section says:

fold-left combine nil list1 list2 . . . [Scheme Procedure] fold-right combine nil list1 list2 . . . [Scheme Procedure] These procedures are identical to the fold and fold-right procedures provided by SRFI-1. See Section 7.5.3.5 [SRFI-1 Fold and Map], page 556, for documentation. 


In section 7.5.3.5, the manual says:
(fold cons ’() ’(1 2 3)) [...] (3 2 1)


But, fold-left does not work like fold: the arguments to the procedure to fold-left are reversed with respect to fold:.

 guile i2.0.11correctly gives the following:

(fold-left cons '() '(1 2 3)) => (((() . 1) . 2) . 3)

(fold-left xcons '() '(1 2 3)) => (3 2 1)


 Matt






This bug report was last modified 8 years and 338 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.