From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Apr 10 16:32:39 2015 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Apr 2015 20:32:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52698 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YgfbS-0002jt-Kq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 16:32:38 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40812) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YgfbQ-0002jf-LN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 16:32:37 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YgfbK-0004Id-0j for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 16:32:31 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:40894) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YgfbJ-0004IX-Ui for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 16:32:29 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54317) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YgfbI-0002L1-Pp for bug-auctex@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 16:32:29 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YgfbE-0004Eu-L8 for bug-auctex@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 16:32:28 -0400 Received: from smtp02.univ-lille1.fr ([2001:660:4401:100::20]:57673) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YgfbE-0004Dt-BG for bug-auctex@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 16:32:24 -0400 Received: from smtps1.univ-lille1.fr (smtps1.univ-lille1.fr [193.49.225.52]) by smtp02.univ-lille1.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id t3AK9Y4r024343 for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 22:09:34 +0200 Received: from [192.168.0.11] (hel59-4-88-160-125-12.fbx.proxad.net [88.160.125.12]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtps1.univ-lille1.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id t3AK9TjE030027 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 22:09:32 +0200 From: jfbu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: 11.88.3; LaTeX-fill-paragraph gives unexpected result Message-Id: <54EBC8B1-115C-4B35-881F-CAFD189FB669@free.fr> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 22:09:26 +0200 To: bug-auctex@gnu.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-USTL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-USTL-MailScanner-ID: t3AK9Y4r024343 X-USTL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-USTL-MailScanner-From: jfbu@free.fr X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and what in fact did happen. Be sure to consult the FAQ section in the manual before submitting a bug report. In addition check if the bug is reproducable with an up-to-date version of AUCTeX. So please upgrade to the version available from http://www.gnu.org/software/auctex/ if your installation is older than the one available from the web site. If the bug is triggered by a specific (La)TeX file, you should try to produce a minimal sample file showing the problem and include it in your report. Your report will be posted for the auctex package at the GNU bug tracker. Visit http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=3Dauctex to browse existing AUCTeX bugs. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Emacs : GNU Emacs 24.4.91.1 (x86_64-apple-darwin13.4.0, Carbon Version = 157 AppKit 1265.21) of 2015-03-15 on Atago.local Package: 11.88.3 I do not understand the behavior of LaTeX-fill-paragraph. It keeps = annoying me with partially filled paragraphs. I always work with hard-wrapped paragraphs and hit M-q very often to = rewrap when I modify things. But something seems weird with LaTeX-fill-paragraph perhaps related to = $..$ material it finds. Sample .tex file illustrating the problem: ------------- \documentclass{article} \begin{document} % Sample paragraph Without the separation axiom this does not work, for example let $V$ be = an infinite dimensional Banach space and let $X =3D V\cup\{*\}$, and let's = declare=20 open the standard open $U\subset V$ as well as $X$ itself. This defines = a=20 topology. The space is globally compact in the sense of coverings, but = it=20 is not locally compact. Fortunately, it is not separated. % Applying M-q (LaTeX-fill-paragraph) to the paragraph above we get: Without the separation axiom this does not work, for example let $V$ be = an infinite dimensional Banach space and let $X =3D V\cup\{*\}$, and let's declare open the standard open $U\subset V$ as = well as $X$ itself. This defines a topology. The space is globally = compact in the sense of coverings, but it is not locally compact. = Fortunately, it is not separated. % fill-column is 78 \end{document} ------------- regards, Jean-Fran=E7ois= From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Apr 10 17:38:58 2015 Received: (at 20296) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Apr 2015 21:38:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52749 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yggdd-0004X2-QI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 17:38:58 -0400 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:53566) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yggdb-0004Wt-Ep for 20296@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 17:38:56 -0400 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3386E20D06 for <20296@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 17:38:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 10 Apr 2015 17:38:55 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=SsCyQLN1QP7z5KrngeOxU9it5QQ=; b=r18GG UW/YX4cc3CHSwIzixcH6DMq34/kB+nJuLbrZFoCWgo5s1BIVFe1xmvh+WO9Uzwj7 8jzd7O6WE2OEWSfin9bThzccZ2K9DD6bR8lmNBfz4lh90VL4pz1njfobG+wxD3P1 AipqUAofPVH0w1Qsk4V6xVDqRP4WzU9xeKQ5Yg= X-Sasl-enc: QhvCashD88TG4i39WpsPcvUQfnOJ/lp2sh0O/QFF17l8 1428701934 Received: from thinkpad-t440p (unknown [2.163.240.161]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5ED1AC0001D; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 17:38:54 -0400 (EDT) From: Tassilo Horn To: jfbu Subject: Re: bug#20296: 11.88.3; LaTeX-fill-paragraph gives unexpected result References: <54EBC8B1-115C-4B35-881F-CAFD189FB669@free.fr> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 23:38:51 +0200 In-Reply-To: <54EBC8B1-115C-4B35-881F-CAFD189FB669@free.fr> (jfbu@free.fr's message of "Fri, 10 Apr 2015 22:09:26 +0200") Message-ID: <87twwnd5p0.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 20296 Cc: 20296@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) jfbu writes: > I do not understand the behavior of LaTeX-fill-paragraph. It keeps > annoying me with partially filled paragraphs. > > Sample .tex file illustrating the problem: > > ------------- > \documentclass{article} > > \begin{document} > % Sample paragraph > > Without the separation axiom this does not work, for example let $V$ be an > infinite dimensional Banach space and let $X = V\cup\{*\}$, and let's declare > open the standard open $U\subset V$ as well as $X$ itself. This defines a > topology. The space is globally compact in the sense of coverings, but it > is not locally compact. Fortunately, it is not separated. > > % Applying M-q (LaTeX-fill-paragraph) to the paragraph above we get: > > Without the separation axiom this does not work, for example let $V$ be an > infinite dimensional Banach space and let $X = > V\cup\{*\}$, and let's declare open the standard open $U\subset V$ as well as > $X$ itself. This defines a topology. The space is globally compact in the sense > of coverings, but it is not locally compact. Fortunately, it is not separated. > > % fill-column is 78 > \end{document} > ------------- With a fresh emacs running AUCTeX 11.88.3 with no configurations, the paragraph above is filled to --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- Without the separation axiom this does not work, for example let $V$ be an infinite dimensional Banach space and let $X = V\cup\{*\}$, and let's declare open the standard open $U\subset V$ as well as $X$ itself. This defines a topology. The space is globally compact in the sense of coverings, but it is not locally compact. Fortunately, it is not separated. --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- here when fill-column is 78. That looks correct to me. So maybe something in your configs causes the bad filling. Bye, Tassilo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Apr 11 03:43:05 2015 Received: (at 20296) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Apr 2015 07:43:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52829 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Ygq4G-0004Qk-VV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 03:43:05 -0400 Received: from smtp01.univ-lille1.fr ([193.49.225.19]:50019) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Ygq4F-0004QC-0P for 20296@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 03:43:03 -0400 Received: from smtps1.univ-lille1.fr (smtps1.univ-lille1.fr [193.49.225.52]) by smtp01.univ-lille1.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id t3B7grKs000435; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 09:42:53 +0200 Received: from [192.168.0.11] (hel59-4-88-160-125-12.fbx.proxad.net [88.160.125.12]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtps1.univ-lille1.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id t3B7gh3H010353 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 11 Apr 2015 09:42:45 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: bug#20296: 11.88.3; LaTeX-fill-paragraph gives unexpected result From: jfbu In-Reply-To: <87twwnd5p0.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 09:42:43 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <54EBC8B1-115C-4B35-881F-CAFD189FB669@free.fr> <87twwnd5p0.fsf@gnu.org> To: Tassilo Horn X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-USTL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-USTL-MailScanner-ID: t3B7grKs000435 X-USTL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-USTL-MailScanner-From: jfbu@free.fr X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 20296 Cc: 20296@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Le 10 avr. 2015 =E0 23:38, Tassilo Horn a =E9crit : > jfbu writes: >=20 >> I do not understand the behavior of LaTeX-fill-paragraph. It keeps >> annoying me with partially filled paragraphs. >>=20 >> Sample .tex file illustrating the problem: >>=20 >> ------------- >> \documentclass{article} >>=20 >> \begin{document} >> % Sample paragraph >>=20 >> Without the separation axiom this does not work, for example let $V$ = be an >> infinite dimensional Banach space and let $X =3D V\cup\{*\}$, and = let's declare=20 >> open the standard open $U\subset V$ as well as $X$ itself. This = defines a=20 >> topology. The space is globally compact in the sense of coverings, = but it=20 >> is not locally compact. Fortunately, it is not separated. >>=20 >> % Applying M-q (LaTeX-fill-paragraph) to the paragraph above we get: >>=20 >> Without the separation axiom this does not work, for example let $V$ = be an >> infinite dimensional Banach space and let $X =3D >> V\cup\{*\}$, and let's declare open the standard open $U\subset V$ as = well as >> $X$ itself. This defines a topology. The space is globally compact in = the sense >> of coverings, but it is not locally compact. Fortunately, it is not = separated. >>=20 >> % fill-column is 78 >> \end{document} >> ------------- >=20 > With a fresh emacs running AUCTeX 11.88.3 with no configurations, the > paragraph above is filled to >=20 > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > Without the separation axiom this does not work, for example let $V$ = be an > infinite dimensional Banach space and let $X =3D V\cup\{*\}$, and = let's declare > open the standard open $U\subset V$ as well as $X$ itself. This = defines a > topology. The space is globally compact in the sense of coverings, but = it is > not locally compact. Fortunately, it is not separated. > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- >=20 > here when fill-column is 78. That looks correct to me. So maybe > something in your configs causes the bad filling. >=20 > Bye, > Tassilo Hi Tassilo,=20 thanks for having looked into this. I have identified the bad config (sorry for not having done it earlier). Turns out I have=20 (custom-set-variables ;; custom-set-variables was added by Custom. ;; If you edit it by hand, you could mess it up, so be careful. ;; Your init file should contain only one such instance. ;; If there is more than one, they won't work right. ; ... '(LaTeX-verbatim-macros-with-delims nil) ;... ) in my custom file If I comment the LaTeX-verbatim-macros-with-delims setting, the problem disappears. (I obtained that via a dichotomy search on both my custom and init = files,=20 that was full of suspense and the final result is a surprise) As it stands the effect is: LaTeX-verbatim-macros-with-delims is a variable defined in `latex.el'. Its value is nil Original value was ("verb" "verb*") As I don't master elisp I must have done an error, and assigning nil value to this variable is not the correct way to remove "verb" and = "verb*" from it. The rationale for me is that sometimes I redefine the \verb macro to allow line breaks in the source and also in the dvi/pdf output, thus I = don't care about fill-paragraph not breaking \verb|...| things. Here is a more complete excerpt with possibly relevant lines: (custom-set-variables ;; custom-set-variables was added by Custom. ;; If you edit it by hand, you could mess it up, so be careful. ;; Your init file should contain only one such instance. ;; If there is more than one, they won't work right. '(Info-additional-directory-list (quote ("/sw/share/info"))) '(LaTeX-indent-environment-list (quote (("verbatim" current-indentation) ("verbatim*" current-indentation) ("everbatim" current-indentation) ("everbatim*" current-indentation) ("array") ("displaymath") ("eqnarray") ("eqnarray*") ("equation") ("equation*") ("picture") ("tabbing") ("table") ("table*") ("tabular") ("tabular*")))) '(LaTeX-verbatim-environments (quote ("verbatim" "verbatim*" = "everbatim" "everbatim*"))) ;;BAD '(LaTeX-verbatim-macros-with-delims nil) ;;ENDBAD '(TeX-auto-save nil) '(TeX-close-quote "=BB") '(TeX-command "etex") ; ; ) For my current context, commenting out the bad line is enough of a fix but I would like to understand better why the bad line is bad. Sorry again for not having looked for a bad config before posting the bug report (I should have posted the bug report to myself only first) best Jean-Fran=E7ois From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Apr 11 07:58:32 2015 Received: (at 20296) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Apr 2015 11:58:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52949 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Ygu3U-0004He-4p for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 07:58:32 -0400 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:34531) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Ygu3R-0004HT-U4 for 20296@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 07:58:30 -0400 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 844752086D for <20296@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 07:58:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 11 Apr 2015 07:58:29 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=pkvGSVYB7P5h0COp6VnpZSdzFn8=; b=EkQ2H W20mrNUQqdLf33D0a83DavVybmpIYVJ4+g7VllqcaDQvRLBJSIbI+V4LbRXWL3xX WlRe/6ydkppiSMxdaU6y3YGaA5sO+W0FrdprXGTcs02eHCnEcGM1hBJIXsJjVIuI K3wHFPymPPtLO8jwpDSs9u1gOepBgeYu4AdmHk= X-Sasl-enc: d22NcqALDp63/44eHnbDs0xFMlgOzHj348uQ6bD8N1L9 1428753509 Received: from thinkpad-t440p (unknown [2.161.103.173]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B168C6801A0; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 07:58:28 -0400 (EDT) From: Tassilo Horn To: jfbu Subject: Re: bug#20296: 11.88.3; LaTeX-fill-paragraph gives unexpected result References: <54EBC8B1-115C-4B35-881F-CAFD189FB669@free.fr> <87twwnd5p0.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 13:58:26 +0200 In-Reply-To: (jfbu@free.fr's message of "Sat, 11 Apr 2015 09:42:43 +0200") Message-ID: <87fv86khb1.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 20296 Cc: 20296@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) jfbu writes: Hi! > I have identified the bad config (sorry for not having done it > earlier). > > Turns out I have > > (custom-set-variables > ;; custom-set-variables was added by Custom. > ;; If you edit it by hand, you could mess it up, so be careful. > ;; Your init file should contain only one such instance. > ;; If there is more than one, they won't work right. > ; ... > '(LaTeX-verbatim-macros-with-delims nil) > ;... > ) > > For my current context, commenting out the bad line is enough of a fix > but I would like to understand better why the bad line is bad. I can reproduce that here but I have no clue why that line breaks indentation. But at least the problem isn't there in the development version. I'll try to make a new ELPA release ASAP. Please report back if that fixes things. Bye, Tassilo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Apr 11 08:07:14 2015 Received: (at 20296) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Apr 2015 12:07:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52966 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YguBu-0004eF-1d for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 08:07:14 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:42197 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YguBs-0004e6-37 for 20296@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 08:07:12 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54685 helo=lola) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YguBr-0002Ks-CZ; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 08:07:11 -0400 Received: by lola (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0A906E0645; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 14:07:11 +0200 (CEST) From: David Kastrup To: Tassilo Horn Subject: Re: bug#20296: 11.88.3; LaTeX-fill-paragraph gives unexpected result References: <54EBC8B1-115C-4B35-881F-CAFD189FB669@free.fr> <87twwnd5p0.fsf@gnu.org> <87fv86khb1.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 14:07:11 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87fv86khb1.fsf@gnu.org> (Tassilo Horn's message of "Sat, 11 Apr 2015 13:58:26 +0200") Message-ID: <87twwmlvgw.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 20296 Cc: 20296@debbugs.gnu.org, jfbu X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Tassilo Horn writes: > jfbu writes: > > Hi! >> I have identified the bad config (sorry for not having done it >> earlier). >> >> Turns out I have >> >> (custom-set-variables >> ;; custom-set-variables was added by Custom. >> ;; If you edit it by hand, you could mess it up, so be careful. >> ;; Your init file should contain only one such instance. >> ;; If there is more than one, they won't work right. >> ; ... >> '(LaTeX-verbatim-macros-with-delims nil) >> ;... >> ) >> >> For my current context, commenting out the bad line is enough of a fix >> but I would like to understand better why the bad line is bad. > > I can reproduce that here but I have no clue why that line breaks > indentation. But at least the problem isn't there in the development > version. I'll try to make a new ELPA release ASAP. Please report back > if that fixes things. (regexp-opt nil t) => "" Which does _not_ heed "If optional PAREN is non-nil, ensure that the returned regexp is enclosed by at least one regexp grouping construct." and matches everywhere instead of nowhere. Probably enough to throw AUCTeX off track. -- David Kastrup From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Apr 11 10:47:00 2015 Received: (at 20296) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Apr 2015 14:47:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53291 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YgwgV-0001MK-OG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 10:47:00 -0400 Received: from smtp02.univ-lille1.fr ([193.49.225.20]:60910) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YgwgS-0001Lz-AS for 20296@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 10:46:58 -0400 Received: from smtps2.univ-lille1.fr (smtps2.univ-lille1.fr [193.49.225.53]) by smtp02.univ-lille1.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id t3BEkdeH027727; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 16:46:39 +0200 Received: from [192.168.0.11] (hel59-4-88-160-125-12.fbx.proxad.net [88.160.125.12]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtps2.univ-lille1.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id t3BEkWHN008435 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 11 Apr 2015 16:46:34 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: bug#20296: 11.88.3; LaTeX-fill-paragraph gives unexpected result From: jfbu In-Reply-To: <87fv86khb1.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 16:46:33 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <54EBC8B1-115C-4B35-881F-CAFD189FB669@free.fr> <87twwnd5p0.fsf@gnu.org> <87fv86khb1.fsf@gnu.org> To: Tassilo Horn X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-USTL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-USTL-MailScanner-ID: t3BEkdeH027727 X-USTL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-USTL-MailScanner-From: jfbu@free.fr X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 20296 Cc: 20296@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Hi Tassilo, >> I have identified the bad config (sorry for not having done it >> earlier). >>=20 >> Turns out I have=20 >>=20 >> (custom-set-variables >> ;; custom-set-variables was added by Custom. >> ;; If you edit it by hand, you could mess it up, so be careful. >> ;; Your init file should contain only one such instance. >> ;; If there is more than one, they won't work right. >> ; ... >> '(LaTeX-verbatim-macros-with-delims nil) >> ;... >> ) >>=20 >> For my current context, commenting out the bad line is enough of a = fix >> but I would like to understand better why the bad line is bad. >=20 > I can reproduce that here but I have no clue why that line breaks > indentation. But at least the problem isn't there in the development > version. I'll try to make a new ELPA release ASAP. Please report = back > if that fixes things. good news that it is already fixed in the development version ! thus my custom setup for LaTeX-verbatim-macros-with-delims shouldn't have theoretically by itself caused the trouble ? I will of course report back when next ELPA release becomes available These days, I am sometimes off the net for some more or less extended periods, thus in case feedback is not immediate, it will be because I am in the "off" phase, thanks Jean-Fran=E7ois From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Apr 11 15:28:01 2015 Received: (at 20296) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Apr 2015 19:28:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53424 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yh14S-0008H2-Rr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 15:28:01 -0400 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:45417) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yh14R-0008Gs-03 for 20296@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 15:27:59 -0400 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B45E5208C7 for <20296@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 15:27:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 11 Apr 2015 15:27:58 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=fTu5n39ogR41OlhWBsdQ73GUX9M=; b=p9bJk ElmvwNDriJFv6ifD8ieKtx/BruokMgSEmZtejL+tlgSfXghZsywNsAu4Qb4yI2nw SWicNCSxcXf27B/y7/IrAZJkrK6PeZGbZQBvgk1Gj+3KMbUV3LOGoiWCr//S+sKE fFSGgSKLUUvlpw2jHjO4E9MvBhGwBGnIfMT/2Y= X-Sasl-enc: de/zagGl92r2d59hRJ+BTj38m3tq2dPZK16wmAJJlYE4 1428780478 Received: from thinkpad-t440p (unknown [2.161.103.173]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E5FD5680178; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 15:27:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Tassilo Horn To: jfbu Subject: Re: bug#20296: 11.88.3; LaTeX-fill-paragraph gives unexpected result References: <54EBC8B1-115C-4B35-881F-CAFD189FB669@free.fr> <87twwnd5p0.fsf@gnu.org> <87fv86khb1.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 21:27:55 +0200 In-Reply-To: (jfbu@free.fr's message of "Sat, 11 Apr 2015 16:46:33 +0200") Message-ID: <87r3rqwjlw.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 20296 Cc: 20296@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) jfbu writes: >> I can reproduce that here but I have no clue why that line breaks >> indentation. But at least the problem isn't there in the development >> version. I'll try to make a new ELPA release ASAP. Please report back >> if that fixes things. > > good news that it is already fixed in the development version ! > > thus my custom setup for LaTeX-verbatim-macros-with-delims shouldn't > have theoretically by itself caused the trouble ? David has a point there. I'll have to look how the regexp is used in the filling code. > I will of course report back when next ELPA release becomes available Thanks. > These days, I am sometimes off the net for some more or less extended > periods, thus in case feedback is not immediate, it will be because > I am in the "off" phase, That's no problem. I won't hold my breath until your feedback. :-) Bye, Tassilo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Mar 03 09:28:00 2024 Received: (at 20296) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Mar 2024 14:28:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39932 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rgmoq-00021X-Hc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 09:28:00 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40284) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rgmoo-00021C-Pk for 20296@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 09:27:59 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rgmoG-00081s-2D; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 09:27:24 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=dT+a6px3iR3d94eBN6vtyElgMDYIqxGrNNywZHuja0s=; b=LWWAaw4Qsxda3UzDe0/z VIOvLSpqtAi3sOA8JpWYjU1g2WeHJ6zMI3BLUHAOiT+BhtgrWZSeDKiUgL0GbThoDa9HCJOUsM7Ie bxGXNd7tEts9CnKInhh5MRqOL19xQEAMwEvzat1oHJoJB7RfN6cOmvg7pKmACelbWGBVwYaCvjGnr OJIp9HEy7Dyqv45PQhh7T92cW9yum584+y1Dc8zTNOOWUasi0GFc/hUVnsE1Tueos9oQFVjbKTD6N FivsR/ZnAd7GewwA7/BkKgzknGCakw4U5guuZr6/E6Y05y0kY7gvxZIJLf0LRPO9TSkqzWYnagjs1 pamTHFLaxFlsMA==; From: Arash Esbati To: Tassilo Horn Subject: Re: bug#20296: 11.88.3; LaTeX-fill-paragraph gives unexpected result In-Reply-To: <87r3rqwjlw.fsf@gnu.org> (Tassilo Horn's message of "Sat, 11 Apr 2015 21:27:55 +0200") References: <54EBC8B1-115C-4B35-881F-CAFD189FB669@free.fr> <87twwnd5p0.fsf@gnu.org> <87fv86khb1.fsf@gnu.org> <87r3rqwjlw.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2024 15:27:19 +0100 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 20296 Cc: 20296@debbugs.gnu.org, jfbu X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Tassilo Horn writes: > jfbu writes: > >>> I can reproduce that here but I have no clue why that line breaks >>> indentation. But at least the problem isn't there in the development >>> version. I'll try to make a new ELPA release ASAP. Please report back >>> if that fixes things. >> >> good news that it is already fixed in the development version ! >> >> thus my custom setup for LaTeX-verbatim-macros-with-delims shouldn't >> have theoretically by itself caused the trouble ? > > David has a point there. I'll have to look how the regexp is used in > the filling code. (I'm going through old bug reports that unfortunately weren't resolved at the time.) Eval'ing (regexp-opt nil t) says "\\(\\`a\\`\\)" for me with Emacs 30. Trying the recipe provided with `LaTeX-verbatim-macros-with-delims' set to nil and it works as expected. Therefore I'm closing this report. Best, Arash From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Mar 03 09:28:26 2024 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Mar 2024 14:28:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39937 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rgmpG-00022Q-0e for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 09:28:26 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56000) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rgmpE-00022D-NE for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 09:28:25 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rgmog-000849-DX for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 09:27:50 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:Subject:To:From:in-reply-to: references; bh=Hypx9A2q5zuWDcA0a6jpRnN6VissMgi18NapV8BGdIg=; b=KEF6jNp1ScdRwj sM8oxVd1MIrhDuHZv5LLo2XWjvjLqIVC+XNtpX08RetUlqbIoZsoWI2cbpYUmBMSVU7q1i5unpFgf 9SVkwNJQgcX8jeH446HNxYKYbGWfHL4VJ7VxZLYvDniUJhSUwo1Q4OTK+vbLKCO8Z3aW4t/cqVoJh nfMeQRXlIu3OxLO+eB8zfqh4y6YR5zujT8mODMe8v6kPaXI3x34yOMwYI2qmBQKY/XBF4NSUt82yu l57ktG29nRpZU9C9mWCY0dBFseHXqN0PqoWebSJLOQ4C790FV3PJfhtnP/n4BQLt3wuQL6Op30+5F nIoyvAW6J+gSA3cybpEQ==; From: Arash Esbati To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: control message for bug #20296 Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2024 15:27:46 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) close 20296 quit From unknown Wed Jun 25 03:55:48 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2024 11:24:10 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator