GNU bug report logs - #20290
25.0.50; Use unified diff format by default, and recommend using it in reports and patches

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#20290: closed (25.0.50; Use unified diff format by default,
 and recommend using it in reports and patches)
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 02:17:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Tue, 14 Apr 2015 05:16:28 +0300
with message-id <552C787C.70608 <at> yandex.ru>
and subject line Re: bug#20290: 25.0.50; Use unified diff format by default, and recommend using it in reports and patches
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #20290,
regarding 25.0.50; Use unified diff format by default, and recommend using it in reports and patches
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
20290: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=20290
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 25.0.50;
 Use unified diff format by default, and recommend using it in reports
 and patches
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 23:05:42 +0300

That should involve changing the default `diff-switches' value and small
changes to doc/emacs/files.texi and doc/emacs/trouble.texi.

Let me know if I missed something.

Barring any objections, I'll do that tomorrow-ish, on master.

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>
To: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>, 20290-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#20290: 25.0.50; Use unified diff format by default,
 and recommend using it in reports and patches
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 05:16:28 +0300

On 04/13/2015 02:30 AM, Paul Eggert wrote:
> As I recall, RMS preferred diff -c to diff -u, and that is partly why
> trouble.texi suggests -c over -u and why diff-switches defaults to -c.

Yup, Stephen reminded of that in a recent emacs-devel thread, so I 
thought this would be a good time to try to change it.

> These days -u format is far more popular than -c format in practice, and
> I expect that most active Emacs developers prefer -u, so it's
> appropriate for Emacs to default to -u and for trouble.texi to suggest it.

This is done now. Thanks everyone.

> I suppose that in theory there is the issue of Emacs running on an older
> POSIXish platform where 'diff' does not support -u.  I don't have access
> to any such platform, though.  I can confirm that Solaris 10 diff (2005)
> supports '-u'.  So perhaps we don't need to worry about this.

I think the usual response is that users on outdated systems don't 
necessarily have to be able to use the latest-and-greatest Emacs.

But in this case the incompatibility would be very minor: if someone 
actually encounters this problem, they'll only need to customize the 
relevant variable.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.