Subject: bug#20241: 25.0.50; `setq' with only one argument

From: John Wiegley <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:40:15 -0800

>>>>> Artur Malabarba <[email-masked]> writes:

> This is a bug then (probably in the advertised-calling-convention of
> funcall). Functions called with the wrong number of arguments are usually
> reported as warnings by the byte-compiler.

Ok, let's go with this then:

    Evaluation:  Run-time error
    Compilation: Compile-time warning
    Execution:   Run-time error (same as Evaluation)

I think that's the convergence point for the three of us, amirite?

John