Subject: bug#20241: 25.0.50; `setq' with only one argument

From: Artur Malabarba <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 19:34:02 +0000

On 25 Nov 2015 7:06 pm, "John Wiegley" <[email-masked]> wrote:
>
>   The code: (funcall)
>
>   Interpreted: Raises an error: eval: Wrong number of arguments: funcall,
0
>
>   Byte-compilation: No warnings or errors printed.

This is a bug then (probably in the advertised-calling-convention of
funcall). Functions called with the wrong number of arguments are usually
reported as warnings by the byte-compiler.