GNU bug report logs - #20199
Enhancement request for date's "-d" option: different epochs

Previous Next

Full log

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "Ulrich Windl" <Ulrich.Windl <at> rz.uni-regensburg.de>
To: <bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Enhancement request for date's "-d" option: different epochs
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 13:26:25 +0100

Hi!

I'm not subscribed to this list, and I hope this is the right place to report an enhancement request as there seems to be no bugzilla for that.
Anyway: When downloading the current leap seconds list for out NTP server I realized that the dates there seem to be specified in seconds from 1900-01-01_00:00:00 on one hand, and on the other I realized that date's option "-d" only allows UNIX epochs using the "@" notation.

Therefore I suggest to allow different starting epochs, possible using a syntax like "date -d '1900-01-01+2287785599'" to print the date and time of 2287785599 seconds past January 1st 1900. ("Like" means I suggest the semantics, but are not really proposing a concrete syntax; possibly there are smarter guy around than me)

Also being able to decode hexadecimal NTP timestamps would be a nice feature: NTp timestamps look like this:
d8bd24ef.a8e2bb68 meaning "Wed, Mar 25 2015 13:13:35.659...", so it's 32 bit for the seconds and another 32 bit for the fractional seconds (see page 9 of the PostScript or PDF version of RFC 1305: "NTP timestamps are represented as a 64-bit
unsigned fixed-point number, in seconds relative to 0h on 1 January 1900. The integer part is in the
first 32 bits and the fraction part in the last 32 bits.")

Maybe a "tagged" syntax like "-d NTP:d8bd24ef.a8e2bb6" could be used...

(For consistency other tags like "UNIX:" for the UNIX epoch and "MS-WIN:" for Microsoft Windows could be used. Again smart guys probably know more important epochs than I do)

Regards,
Ulrich

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.