From unknown Mon Jun 23 14:52:06 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#20177 <20177@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#20177 <20177@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 24.4: bookmark.el: show all annotations does not display in proper order (FIX INCLUDED) Reply-To: bug#20177 <20177@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 21:52:06 +0000 retitle 20177 24.4: bookmark.el: show all annotations does not display in p= roper order (FIX INCLUDED) reassign 20177 emacs submitter 20177 Boruch Baum severity 20177 minor tag 20177 patch thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Mar 23 06:23:06 2015 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Mar 2015 10:23:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33198 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YZzVh-0001SU-JC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 06:23:06 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49526) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YZzVe-0001Rv-UN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 06:23:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YZzVY-0001u7-Qz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 06:22:57 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:51732) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YZzVY-0001u3-NK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 06:22:56 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51243) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YZzVX-00016z-HR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 06:22:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YZzVT-0001ti-GT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 06:22:55 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:52018) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YZzVT-0001tb-6F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 06:22:51 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.10] ([96.232.130.59]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MOO6X-1Yd2J33LO9-005tzX for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 11:22:49 +0100 Message-ID: <550FE93D.1030300@gmx.com> Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 06:21:49 -0400 From: Boruch Baum User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 24.4: bookmark.el: show all annotations does not display in proper order (FIX INCLUDED) OpenPGP: url=hkp://keys.gnupg.net Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TkmKH9Ul2AXWR4eoDmTgAXCQjieRQRPmM" X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:bNfzN+m3TtwlL5LDcCQZXQ+YuTCMDu3Gik5e1e+mC7U++6HW+Sp oRoKRqn3EulD6T9NHGR/A6obwidpjx7XIwvwqyH7Ze+rodVGkj+3s5rx8Vic83EoGhmivBh Bvs81gUBQIo/CsDICS1Ay8/Br0tc9rcpv7MeqceWoOWllbwWazW8VYbDsokn8G/p199RFQN BvcLyCgqXWALHIXbXsA4A== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --TkmKH9Ul2AXWR4eoDmTgAXCQjieRQRPmM Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------020607030306070207040301" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020607030306070207040301 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable When `bookmark-sort-flag' is set, the bmenu list displays in sorted order, but the function `bookmark-show-all-annotations' (keybinding `A'), does not. The first attached patch file, `simple.patch', is just that. The second attached patch file, `fancy.patch', adds an option to display the list of all annotations as a pre-formatted org-mode buffer, based upon the setting of a new variable, `bookmark-show-all-annotations-in-org-mode'. --=20 hkp://keys.gnupg.net CA45 09B5 5351 7C11 A9D1 7286 0036 9E45 1595 8BC0 --------------020607030306070207040301 Content-Type: text/x-patch; name="simple.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="simple.patch" --- bookmark.el 2015-03-23 04:52:30.503739608 -0400 +++ bookmark-new.el 2015-03-23 05:15:50.763694210 -0400 @@ -1756,7 +1756,7 @@ (save-selected-window (pop-to-buffer (get-buffer-create "*Bookmark Annotation*") t) (delete-region (point-min) (point-max)) - (dolist (full-record bookmark-alist) + (dolist (full-record (bookmark-maybe-sort-alist)) (let* ((name (bookmark-name-from-full-record full-record)) (ann (bookmark-get-annotation full-record))) (insert (concat name ":\n")) --------------020607030306070207040301 Content-Type: text/x-patch; name="fancy.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="fancy.patch" --- bookmark.el 2015-03-23 04:52:30.503739608 -0400 +++ bookmark-new.el 2015-03-23 06:08:22.399592029 -0400 @@ -1751,15 +1751,30 @@ (switch-to-buffer-other-window old-buf)))))) =20 =20 + +(defvar bookmark-show-all-annotations-in-org-mode nil +"When not `nil', the command `bookmark-show-all-annotations' will +format its display as an org-mode buffer") + (defun bookmark-show-all-annotations () "Display the annotations for all bookmarks in a buffer." (save-selected-window (pop-to-buffer (get-buffer-create "*Bookmark Annotation*") t) (delete-region (point-min) (point-max)) - (dolist (full-record bookmark-alist) + (unless (null bookmark-show-all-annotations-in-org-mode) + (org-mode)) + (let* ((heading-text "Bookmark annotations for ALL bookmarks") + (heading (if (null bookmark-show-all-annotations-in-org-mode)= + (concat "# " heading-text "\n---------------------= -------------------\n") + (concat "* " heading-text "\n"))) + (prefix (unless (null bookmark-show-all-annotations-in-org-mo= de) + "** "))) + (insert heading) + + (dolist (full-record (bookmark-maybe-sort-alist)) (let* ((name (bookmark-name-from-full-record full-record)) (ann (bookmark-get-annotation full-record))) - (insert (concat name ":\n")) + (insert (concat prefix name ":\n")) (if (and ann (not (string-equal ann ""))) ;; insert the annotation, indented by 4 spaces. (progn @@ -1769,10 +1784,9 @@ (beginning-of-line) ; paranoia (insert " ") (forward-line) - (end-of-line)))))) + (end-of-line))))))) (goto-char (point-min)))) =20 - (defun bookmark-bmenu-mark () "Mark bookmark on this line to be displayed by \\\\[bookmark-bmenu-select]." (interactive) --------------020607030306070207040301-- --TkmKH9Ul2AXWR4eoDmTgAXCQjieRQRPmM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVD+k9AAoJEDvrUfDmCx9LCPoQAIvjgzwXLUIRo4RApBPaJQkH BcngHteqNcOTFqOHCJnaIdO/GvQhi4EWgCMmDZoz4xCYdecb51zz5VRAMZ+a3PU+ eS+T28QRT9eqwr4W269+mbXhbFviBP3ikQ22vm9Ff35yvbMV9s/RxDi7ffc4Sg/8 yqvMAoRpCync3WTq7gUs8mi6cMZRQXYlzVeW0nGFqGA7LjPqs6em62YocfqwIGFH dgC2ehlTdaAedk2rHsZVbfX6ekHI4DdAp4uJPo78IO/S1vziRn+pdrnNbQmRw4q9 E9lxIE+s9E3CQBygbAGsZ8RwrKhswud0IpU+qp2KVwf33bkM5z6eWSy6LIYVrBbA +n1P7+Z1j2ne1hXZSD8AKD+Udk/RO3m8ITas5IskDX1tTkBFpVzTB0x97ILFoTuq bFLPpJWdsw3ArMqfCoQ+qdstuol0zGITL4MDz9bElYRYogLk8xPfQza8/dxo+kME 59YKgNNHVwdjN+GUFSZOjnxWxURNJT4qIRUsP3B+psPpKtSRUAqlos0Eun7gJJhJ X70If+d3Jfzt0DPyIfwoR04fPQahaKxiY761t3fEVwZJACOSCQkl9UKLdH8QjUge SnZd8TcivabwGo1ruShCXheOZYNV+mgV+gqpvL80pXdN/veqM3ipdy8af7+A5MlC DyQ2ve7D1owtqvZZxEVG =OB7e -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TkmKH9Ul2AXWR4eoDmTgAXCQjieRQRPmM-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 25 21:56:17 2015 Received: (at 20177) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Mar 2015 01:56:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36774 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yax1s-0008SV-S8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 21:56:17 -0400 Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:34404) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yax1q-0008SI-CM for 20177@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 21:56:14 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgUFAGvvdVRBbthL/2dsb2JhbAA3gVOhb4EIgXUBAQQBViMFCws0BwsUGA0kiBOiEYxkDAODPgMLAQUDCYNTBKg7 X-IPAS-Result: AgUFAGvvdVRBbthL/2dsb2JhbAA3gVOhb4EIgXUBAQQBViMFCws0BwsUGA0kiBOiEYxkDAODPgMLAQUDCYNTBKg7 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,1,1400040000"; d="scan'208";a="114595661" Received: from 65-110-216-75.cpe.pppoe.ca (HELO pastel.home) ([65.110.216.75]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 25 Mar 2015 21:56:10 -0400 Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 9318E2455; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 21:56:08 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Monnier To: Boruch Baum Subject: Re: bug#20177: 24.4: bookmark.el: show all annotations does not display in proper order (FIX INCLUDED) Message-ID: References: <550FE93D.1030300@gmx.com> Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 21:56:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: <550FE93D.1030300@gmx.com> (Boruch Baum's message of "Mon, 23 Mar 2015 06:21:49 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 20177 Cc: 20177@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) > When `bookmark-sort-flag' is set, the bmenu list displays in sorted > order, but the function `bookmark-show-all-annotations' (keybinding > `A'), does not. > The first attached patch file, `simple.patch', is just that. Thanks, attached. > The second attached patch file, `fancy.patch', adds an option to display > the list of all annotations as a pre-formatted org-mode buffer, based > upon the setting of a new variable, > `bookmark-show-all-annotations-in-org-mode'. I'd tend to think that this buffer should be read-only and using a major mode that derives from special-mode, which seems incompatible with org-mode. It could still use the Org syntax, of course, maybe with an outline-minor-mode. > +(defvar bookmark-show-all-annotations-in-org-mode nil > +"When not `nil', the command `bookmark-show-all-annotations' will > +format its display as an org-mode buffer") I think we can just change the format without introducing an option to recover the old format. Stefan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jun 25 13:35:41 2019 Received: (at 20177) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jun 2019 17:35:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33470 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfpM4-0001gE-W1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 13:35:41 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:53432) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfpM3-0001g8-1D for 20177@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 13:35:39 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=stories) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hfpLx-0002Ru-6V; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 19:35:35 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Stefan Monnier Subject: Re: bug#20177: 24.4: bookmark.el: show all annotations does not display in proper order (FIX INCLUDED) References: <550FE93D.1030300@gmx.com> Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 19:35:33 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Wed, 25 Mar 2015 21:56:08 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Stefan Monnier writes: >> The second attached patch file, `fancy.patch', adds an option to display >> the list of all annotations as a pre-formatted org-mode buffer, based >> upon the setting of a new variable, >> `bookmark [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 20177 Cc: 20177@debbugs.gnu.org, Boruch Baum X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Stefan Monnier writes: >> The second attached patch file, `fancy.patch', adds an option to display >> the list of all annotations as a pre-formatted org-mode buffer, based >> upon the setting of a new variable, >> `bookmark-show-all-annotations-in-org-mode'. > > I'd tend to think that this buffer should be read-only and using a major > mode that derives from special-mode, which seems incompatible with > org-mode. It could still use the Org syntax, of course, maybe with an > outline-minor-mode. > >> +(defvar bookmark-show-all-annotations-in-org-mode nil >> +"When not `nil', the command `bookmark-show-all-annotations' will >> +format its display as an org-mode buffer") > > I think we can just change the format without introducing an option to > recover the old format. I think so too. Boruch, did you do any further work on this? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jun 25 15:57:11 2019 Received: (at 20177) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jun 2019 19:57:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33574 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfrZ1-0001KH-Cm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 15:57:11 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:48949) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfrYx-0001JW-Cu for 20177@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 15:57:08 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1561492618; bh=WfyO+zNTEhmI75xGdys8Mb+FQUt0GZaJwF1BcgP9a3o=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=P2uXod9DBCnp0F2pWn57ab7cs+zLwypg3QslnFuHzSJtha4vRKrt2UBai/CQe7TDm aMZRyZ8zeHq9UdvXGKn9X4Q7PgN7u6ACpvF0iws5WvfT40ojnBc2G6TmGIOcHgKaFP CxKyuiEMwzNc6cYaRumGnlaW45UgN63IIFEw66ao= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from E15-2016.optimum.net ([72.80.59.205]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.184]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MyKHm-1iVbUh2Nps-00yj3c; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 21:43:51 +0200 Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 15:43:45 -0400 From: Boruch Baum To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#20177: 24.4: bookmark.el: show all annotations does not display in proper order (FIX INCLUDED) Message-ID: <20190625194345.2y3ysmqtzvfflusv@E15-2016.optimum.net> References: <550FE93D.1030300@gmx.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:P2zXfBcgNj35tQO6/kR9zhQrhImTEp5W+qDx+7iwK9rSSBBPWOJ hirH/oPTj5teYybEWN2FbHpZN0Xi27fWZS+vxebBAbcy6l9fAytTrYJefllle00TlaNXIrr nWovMZFMRBmUVLYYDR/hgGzqWYaRGP/VUumH+8U3D8e4ejDwnRZ3GlOyB+9s4l6hG7rtmxv 9ciW+GrQ2IvXjZGOGX8QQ== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:FvbDvMSM9MA=:l+USQ60vQ5Rt0R/OILsBAQ qhtJtRmFWZEqPpNH0lv2MFjrzhMZA1dqlwQj/QxzyAYs4OXAQoExAW91mpSq44lQJihcArSp5 eOawb3ZpUBAkclzeOHxZgx3fLN9lr0+5u2BVcRuQVDmuAXIX2XxZZVN9BctemMoQhaHi22yMA pyfqpKxdZf2rGqour7rVXwLgbs1u/s3CLLBt6Gi4vAGE+UG7nqHCPF/zZb1OFZIu0UueJrGyX ftcfRPP7SX6bnutVuwFf+HY9LwhqZP3S6wNxApko+quktQQJQUMzhBRDSOI7ovEH1A9IxbysM l5kb82HJuhsQr5f+NdPd1D2W+VsWiQNtC+1nv0NWL2vYzaNKuQ5QNJhvm4sF79NhG/o9nrljP Cx4rQr6QHLDFgKPhwsYb4aNVWDfkJHcRRajVelylWKREbgJk4bS1Q25DGKa3Tmt/IjWMO9tK+ KIsBdYMBAihHMuQxHgMq3ivmW+xSjCWZzKE7F6Ked9NpP/0p9MAXkjROTBuWRx++kiEc8fjcf XJwykW7CI7Fj6o7rk3JdzUnl7hZRDWzXdvfxaEr+0exMkl1BXbYbwk/j/og2lj94a+t8GkC21 Qq/yDbA9UeIuD666wExeLedk9GjqT+of69VE6qDtgBZtvKEFcBGB6cF6M+AMxkMeBb0ffLaxl +zJDA7JmxVa4xvhiPYOY/3/LnHkvEuASemrkhFl4SoR50i2cOQiPZ/cuD01Jp5kNKBQGRsrn+ p0RJ6XJDGeD9LuLJ5vF8uJK67JLgQLudGi+zjf82bCV82UjKk61+++E2kIfkb9Ks00uaQd82u riAfHz2Eay9p4O9ZPYnA9usNnVz9DxMdDvDP95NLk+o0FyMS8Qm8NKYRYAEW+GJ2qV6amKYsX pMeoSF1+crDERGfTP28kfPATAiIa8TNRF3WGcnbaSP/wh2QR9aBYqPNzkBLAsTv4DI0L1MS5Z VVnTG1zbgZfwwztuH5q2RJ8uj4s9PjJE= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 20177 Cc: 20177@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On 2019-06-25 19:35, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Stefan Monnier writes: > > >> The second attached patch file, `fancy.patch', adds an option to disp= lay > >> the list of all annotations as a pre-formatted org-mode buffer, based > >> upon the setting of a new variable, > >> `bookmark-show-all-annotations-in-org-mode'. > > > > I'd tend to think that this buffer should be read-only and using a maj= or > > mode that derives from special-mode, which seems incompatible with > > org-mode. It could still use the Org syntax, of course, maybe with an > > outline-minor-mode. > > > >> +(defvar bookmark-show-all-annotations-in-org-mode nil > >> +"When not `nil', the command `bookmark-show-all-annotations' will > >> +format its display as an org-mode buffer") > > > > I think we can just change the format without introducing an option to > > recover the old format. > > I think so too. Boruch, did you do any further work on this? No. ( ... year 2015 ... Thanks for the memories ... ) =2D- hkp://keys.gnupg.net CA45 09B5 5351 7C11 A9D1 7286 0036 9E45 1595 8BC0 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jun 26 09:55:18 2019 Received: (at 20177) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jun 2019 13:55:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34931 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hg8OL-0007bQ-Ga for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 09:55:17 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:49220) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hg8OJ-0007a5-0x for 20177@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 09:55:15 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=stories) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hg8OC-0000OQ-3d; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 15:55:10 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Boruch Baum Subject: Re: bug#20177: 24.4: bookmark.el: show all annotations does not display in proper order (FIX INCLUDED) References: <550FE93D.1030300@gmx.com> <20190625194345.2y3ysmqtzvfflusv@E15-2016.optimum.net> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 15:55:07 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20190625194345.2y3ysmqtzvfflusv@E15-2016.optimum.net> (Boruch Baum's message of "Tue, 25 Jun 2019 15:43:45 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Boruch Baum writes: >> I think so too. Boruch, did you do any further work on this? > > No. ( ... year 2015 ... Thanks for the memories ... ) In that case it seems unlikely that we'd be able to proceed with this bug report and I'm closing it. Please reopen if further progress can be made. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 20177 Cc: 20177@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Boruch Baum writes: >> I think so too. Boruch, did you do any further work on this? > > No. ( ... year 2015 ... Thanks for the memories ... ) In that case it seems unlikely that we'd be able to proceed with this bug report and I'm closing it. Please reopen if further progress can be made. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jun 26 09:55:22 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jun 2019 13:55:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35062 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hg8OP-0007di-VZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 09:55:22 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:49232) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hg8OO-0007bs-Lx for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 09:55:20 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=stories) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hg8OI-0000OV-5h for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 15:55:20 +0200 Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 15:55:14 +0200 Message-Id: To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #20177 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 20177 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) close 20177 quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jun 26 10:47:10 2019 Received: (at 20177) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jun 2019 14:47:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36724 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hg9CY-0000vQ-Hw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 10:47:10 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:50166) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hg9CW-0000tF-1n for 20177@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 10:47:08 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=stories) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hg9CS-0000vi-Iv; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:47:06 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Boruch Baum Subject: Re: bug#20177: 24.4: bookmark.el: show all annotations does not display in proper order (FIX INCLUDED) References: <550FE93D.1030300@gmx.com> <20190625194345.2y3ysmqtzvfflusv@E15-2016.optimum.net> <20190626144501.kvvakcgr7idmohqa@E15-2016.optimum.net> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAFVBMVEURDw0JBwVMSki7ubdy b24EAwIuLCtErD9UAAACYUlEQVQ4jV1UwXbbIBBcKYnOWjXW2cY8zq3h5ZyifZyj16pnmaj8/yd0 ALl2uyfEMLszywrqN2vfiUitK9FK65OtQRk4Ami4xpcbwBW47T8AlFZizkBPDaXOpBLEK/Z67jtm 2lSctDGFSdzV44gubT4EpSrQd62UmGpurMo5GpJSyuNzLyraXgswdjrXUkrK8cmJfK0ABBB1KWns K3WWt3icS3EtAYyoUEO80kokNEsuHlTDxx6kySl0pUO+byWVQS1I5nFMBA9KjDvNMEtnkJU+8ed0 AYFEvLzMTIQNa816TN0mWcZzknjIDNbZmZMAo8HQBta25OKcYCBEK1HDpZqg0CwLcjGH0oe9J/An fgEFgORP+xBvd6Aw/gLfbwA6kaM2S6xvDihCPKTUjNZcR22dk6TO5loZQ1yp26ys1E4X63VqAx+y XI5a2+Nk0UidhZvW16tlHt5t6Pw6YpJcYH49wXkB+jC51b6V6u7KT6fdII9awcm5SHUNP6tDlTts +ni2Ysq+XXmk7xVoFVqKMSsNuaTfM8cK6OnBuCvr9wzkKbD/9ApxxdViCib7f1waGraHMdxHEd+B XrWYpPcazlpfB9bTENMYtS/TWGcOkX+DheZR+cnfZ64G5YsHfRJV0rnb7QCY51bgBfyIW6o/VNQ0 MzrWfHTRi9nU2mAEMadaaM7XxcsH1kF7qtGKQao9enjN+bXCCIq6AzO/nl3RlFX7HeAMfGYXMRaC ofz3zEuu9Et8VVS0ZcZcWT8nV7RCuknpXmP5AftVqsdj8QA861Aejtw5PB53YFMvRV3UBi/MH7Cj 5g9wELhsAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:47:04 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20190626144501.kvvakcgr7idmohqa@E15-2016.optimum.net> (Boruch Baum's message of "Wed, 26 Jun 2019 10:45:01 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Boruch Baum writes: > On 2019-06-26 15:55, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: >> Boruch Baum writes: >> >> >> I think so too. Boruch, did you do any further work on this? >> > >> > No. ( ... year 2015 ... Tha [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 20177 Cc: 20177@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Boruch Baum writes: > On 2019-06-26 15:55, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: >> Boruch Baum writes: >> >> >> I think so too. Boruch, did you do any further work on this? >> > >> > No. ( ... year 2015 ... Thanks for the memories ... ) >> >> In that case it seems unlikely that we'd be able to proceed with this >> bug report and I'm closing it. Please reopen if further progress can be >> made. > > I submitted two versions of patch, so if the objections are to the > 'fancy' one, which added features that aren't good enough, > why not accept the 'simple' patch that addresses the reported bug? Stefan did apply that one at the time... -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jun 26 10:50:16 2019 Received: (at 20177) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jun 2019 14:50:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36738 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hg9FY-0001L2-IR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 10:50:16 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:50264) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hg9FV-0001Ku-RV for 20177@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 10:50:14 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=stories) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hg9FR-0000wc-IH; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:50:13 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Boruch Baum Subject: Re: bug#20177: 24.4: bookmark.el: show all annotations does not display in proper order (FIX INCLUDED) References: <550FE93D.1030300@gmx.com> <20190625194345.2y3ysmqtzvfflusv@E15-2016.optimum.net> <20190626144501.kvvakcgr7idmohqa@E15-2016.optimum.net> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAFVBMVEURDw0JBwVMSki7ubdy b24EAwIuLCtErD9UAAACYUlEQVQ4jV1UwXbbIBBcKYnOWjXW2cY8zq3h5ZyifZyj16pnmaj8/yd0 ALl2uyfEMLszywrqN2vfiUitK9FK65OtQRk4Ami4xpcbwBW47T8AlFZizkBPDaXOpBLEK/Z67jtm 2lSctDGFSdzV44gubT4EpSrQd62UmGpurMo5GpJSyuNzLyraXgswdjrXUkrK8cmJfK0ABBB1KWns K3WWt3icS3EtAYyoUEO80kokNEsuHlTDxx6kySl0pUO+byWVQS1I5nFMBA9KjDvNMEtnkJU+8ed0 AYFEvLzMTIQNa816TN0mWcZzknjIDNbZmZMAo8HQBta25OKcYCBEK1HDpZqg0CwLcjGH0oe9J/An fgEFgORP+xBvd6Aw/gLfbwA6kaM2S6xvDihCPKTUjNZcR22dk6TO5loZQ1yp26ys1E4X63VqAx+y XI5a2+Nk0UidhZvW16tlHt5t6Pw6YpJcYH49wXkB+jC51b6V6u7KT6fdII9awcm5SHUNP6tDlTts +ni2Ysq+XXmk7xVoFVqKMSsNuaTfM8cK6OnBuCvr9wzkKbD/9ApxxdViCib7f1waGraHMdxHEd+B XrWYpPcazlpfB9bTENMYtS/TWGcOkX+DheZR+cnfZ64G5YsHfRJV0rnb7QCY51bgBfyIW6o/VNQ0 MzrWfHTRi9nU2mAEMadaaM7XxcsH1kF7qtGKQao9enjN+bXCCIq6AzO/nl3RlFX7HeAMfGYXMRaC ofz3zEuu9Et8VVS0ZcZcWT8nV7RCuknpXmP5AftVqsdj8QA861Aejtw5PB53YFMvRV3UBi/MH7Cj 5g9wELhsAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:50:09 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:47:04 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Boruch Baum writes: > >> On 2019-06-26 15:55, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: >>> Boruch Baum writes: >>> >>> >> I think so too. Boruch, did you do any further w [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 20177 Cc: 20177@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Boruch Baum writes: > >> On 2019-06-26 15:55, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: >>> Boruch Baum writes: >>> >>> >> I think so too. Boruch, did you do any further work on this? >>> > >>> > No. ( ... year 2015 ... Thanks for the memories ... ) >>> >>> In that case it seems unlikely that we'd be able to proceed with this >>> bug report and I'm closing it. Please reopen if further progress can be >>> made. >> >> I submitted two versions of patch, so if the objections are to the >> 'fancy' one, which added features that aren't good enough, >> why not accept the 'simple' patch that addresses the reported bug? > > Stefan did apply that one at the time... (But he said "Thanks, attached" instead of "applied", which may explain the confustion. :-)) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jun 26 10:50:39 2019 Received: (at 20177) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jun 2019 14:50:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36741 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hg9Fu-0001Lo-TC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 10:50:39 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:34289) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hg9Fs-0001LT-5b for 20177@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 10:50:37 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1561560628; bh=vKFxjR3OEiOcOa0uJd9bw31TLUKC9tbhe40Ls8QRyPI=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=OO0/dHII/HB6UE6PKlf+iotyGDNwGnU6f/aS+XwbGyyQmOLnxpZ73FsLDnK96XFQ0 HJtM0R8fzUtgfVAfpfBA2AO1cqmcqo3RE20xZOJYTGRa/MYiAcxRlPlf44kM0IupTv qlB59pMdXBR8CxAYZpRCOhDE73tIjG1wAkEGKml0= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from E15-2016.optimum.net ([72.80.59.205]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002 [212.227.17.184]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MK17F-1hgy7L1109-001O7O; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:45:06 +0200 Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 10:45:01 -0400 From: Boruch Baum To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#20177: 24.4: bookmark.el: show all annotations does not display in proper order (FIX INCLUDED) Message-ID: <20190626144501.kvvakcgr7idmohqa@E15-2016.optimum.net> References: <550FE93D.1030300@gmx.com> <20190625194345.2y3ysmqtzvfflusv@E15-2016.optimum.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:HlkjIJ16BD1Dq8dl2aRFrPLjTkgN5BbWcDofAkOmrWb018HF/cI A0PdgjeyPavh/DfxE3kivtq2KLpXPph0HbGWS/VhXtPVj5ibmrQ5JIoTucqKT11TAKUTXW4 /GUzTrPWxRfoC22ANHpYEr7w6fTrQJ2b2fNN98JgiTjD0hodSrRXvnP29JyZ4Hf9AZxQhY6 H225pKkAGIDSYi2YGr35w== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:MD9zJWSPChY=:oxO7k42efgr1075vhYksDz SY5AkKPVY+vKlMveLU+Tfe1DRqjwnguULjh8acQQJdhcHhnYE+jUUwW9uAW5nHaA91VWuE94x kz0d/yELUq8bgZuTuNps2QljLfEiA2wHBkG+hGRz75QzWZZ/szFcgqy/mz8Sd5cQYpEFnyZO3 Yxv/ln1a6KRzV5UACAcBGXA9LBxDWD1kkCDQpT1zUGaJh1mdRhLNd7H0x1JZULNy3cGYZV5Vo I1P3o4YkLWmyGw2z/2gmvhpJHlacFAluQIRDp7YPjO3DAE3dvBbI0TcjtmqH6rRyxRihlNNBF pkOlqU9o6ETCTFKCFiGEE1kzwXiyaIY9ktkx+2jp9d64lxzBA+52Rxcmh5Hvp/xk625oVsLcM QnRPgOCqbTIq2vXYN2I6kgvj3h5U0OFfr3a+hRwa5hUXhh3JCh/UuNbUeNOYeV0POgw9hVb2A a863UAUTHeIX7lXnP9WZqUg1/4SvRflBl1k7wmkHA6tqsQPBdmpMNGKYuD5h+k4RCN81YiLz7 lpKvp5xyCspErwkpyqR/m9y0/niUT4ZdPWfNZcHsxoyJB//aQKSvUWR3NV7qGJ1bTmPH9p19d 1XDH8hhkkUO8YqU3oIYYwYDOB6auSw0JnRkj4JpOtUgQcl8uVI82nTQNfHtpWsgdZh/5Kqc2z 3FKYlJPeI2dncP/3cdOmrhKhgQB10yO0aI6Dz7VYT37UKoqBpJGcXUpA19IsaqZuOMsKilqGy EDiMuRxwLMLsQK9E5eQCsRGJ7buaVeFgVWRgu3S4d1kcHMVaOc7CGNz3lXGbNs8NpL+dghJQZ rB0O+QqZWaDelJu2+KOpjtEEPxT9NU4TKAsc943WmH9HNjfg9xJ8pxr0iFUUQNcwyahxDjkoR ZttgkWlOIMm6ItvfuGCBALCfZeEOTLL5XZ/ITOCAKJddl27tqkV0ZFflD5GJDe1G9LvawBVbT VvTZouZBNdfM2I80LYQkoX1HxSEVg2vo= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 20177 Cc: 20177@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On 2019-06-26 15:55, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Boruch Baum writes: > > >> I think so too. Boruch, did you do any further work on this? > > > > No. ( ... year 2015 ... Thanks for the memories ... ) > > In that case it seems unlikely that we'd be able to proceed with this > bug report and I'm closing it. Please reopen if further progress can be > made. I submitted two versions of patch, so if the objections are to the 'fancy' one, which added features that aren't good enough, why not accept the 'simple' patch that addresses the reported bug? =2D- hkp://keys.gnupg.net CA45 09B5 5351 7C11 A9D1 7286 0036 9E45 1595 8BC0 From unknown Mon Jun 23 14:52:06 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 11:24:12 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator