Subject: bug#20148: 24.4: function `bookmark-get-bookmark'

From: Boruch Baum <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 10:44:53 -0400

On 03/20/2015 10:31 AM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> Does that mean the bug can be closed?
Yes. Though, you might want to tweak the documentation, per Drew's
observation.

>> On 03/20/2015 01:04 AM, Drew Adams wrote:
>>> The doc string neglects to mention the optional argument.  It should
>>> say something like this (taken from Bookmark+):
>>>
>>> Non-nil optional arg NOERROR means return nil if BOOKMARK is not a
>>> valid bookmark.  If NOERROR is nil then raise an error in this case.

-- 
hkp://keys.gnupg.net
CA45 09B5 5351 7C11 A9D1  7286 0036 9E45 1595 8BC0