GNU bug report logs - #20095
conditional branching

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Erik Popp <epopp <at> i2pmail.org>
Subject: bug#20095: closed (Re: sed conditional branching)
Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 17:17:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your bug report

#20095: conditional branching

which was filed against the sed package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 20095 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
20095: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=20095
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Jim Meyering <jim <at> meyering.net>
To: Erik Popp <epopp <at> i2pmail.org>, 20095-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: sed conditional branching
Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 10:16:05 -0700

tags 20095 notabug
thanks

Davide Brini's analysis at https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=20095#8
is correct. "t" works like this:

't LABEL'
     Branch to LABEL only if there has been a successful 's'ubstitution
     since the last input line was read or conditional branch was taken.
     The LABEL may be omitted, in which case the next cycle is started.

yet your script expects it to work differently.

Hence, I'm marking this issue as a non-bug and closing it.
However, you are welcome to reply here; any comments will
be logged at https://bugs.gnu.org/20095.

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Erik Popp <epopp <at> i2pmail.org>
To: bug-sed <at> gnu.org
Subject: conditional branching
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 02:42:07 +0000 (UTC)

[Message part 4 (text/html, inline)]

[filesystem-events.log (text/x-log, attachment)]

[log-filter.sed (text/plain, attachment)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.