From unknown Mon Jun 23 06:01:14 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#20071: none Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=C4=8Cech?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 12:00:05 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 20071 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 20071@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.14259887887075 (code B ref -1); Tue, 10 Mar 2015 12:00:05 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Mar 2015 11:59:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41288 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YVIp9-0001q2-PK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 07:59:48 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57075) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YVIp7-0001pl-Tt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 07:59:46 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YVIp1-0007CB-EI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 07:59:40 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:38507) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YVIp1-0007C7-CF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 07:59:39 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58773) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YVIoy-0006ac-UL for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 07:59:39 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YVIot-0007Ax-SZ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 07:59:36 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:59374 helo=mx2.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YVIot-0007As-Lc; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 07:59:31 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay1.suse.de (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AF39AC6E; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 11:59:31 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 12:59:30 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=C4=8Cech?= Message-ID: <20150310115930.GG16813@crashnator.suse.cz> References: <87a9347gtj.wl%sleep_walker@suse.cz> <87wq67qao8.fsf@gnu.org> <874mta7au9.wl%sleep_walker@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vv4Sf/kQfcwinyKX" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <874mta7au9.wl%sleep_walker@suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2011-07-01) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x (no timestamps) [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) --vv4Sf/kQfcwinyKX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 09:35:42AM +0100, Tomas Cech wrote: >At Fri, 05 Dec 2014 00:04:23 +0100, >Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> >> Tomas Cech skribis: >> >> > I tried to install Guix as alternative OS to my Gentoo and openSUSE >> > installations to give a try. I tried unsupported scenario - >> > installation on LVM volume and separate /boot partition until I was >> > told it is unsupported. Separate boot wasn't hard as I had to just >> > copy generated files so they are loaded. >> >> OK, but there=E2=80=99s still an open bug on that topic. :-) >> http://bugs.gnu.org/19220 > >Good, I'll give a try again. > >> > 1] if you set device to partition (and not to disk) in your grub-confi= guration like this: >> > >> > (bootloader (grub-configuration >> > (device "/dev/sda4"))) >> >> Why would you want to use a partition and not a disk? I didn=E2=80=99t = know >> this was even possible. > >Because this way I can separate Grub managed by Guix and Grub from my >Gentoo. As I'm playing with that on my notebook I need for work, this >way can reduce risks. > >I'm not sure how Guix installer can manipulate with grub.cfg and I'd >like to always have some working system... > >> >> > `guix system init' will fail on grub installation. By default Grub >> > tries to fit in the beginning of partition and fails if it can't fit >> > in. I asked about this behaviour on Grub mailing list and it seems >> > that there are two options: >> > >> > a] add `--force' to command line and use block list for keeping info= rmation about position of Grub's core.img >> > b] use filesystem which allows embedding - BtrFS or ZFS >> > >> > I verified both options (a] and then b] with BtrFS) and it no longer f= ails. >> > >> > But, >> > ad a] - I don't feel safe passing `--force' to grub-install every >> > time. So if installation fails on this point and you'd like to use >> > your FS anyway, you can pass `--no-grub' to `guix system init' and >> > then rung grub-install manually. >> > >> > ad b] - I don't feel safe using still experimental BtrFS. >> >> OK. I think the conclusion for Guix is to leave the defaults unchanged. >> Perhaps we could add a =E2=80=98force?=E2=80=99 field to the =E2=80=98gr= ub-configuration=E2=80=99 data >> type to allow those who know what they doing to get the effect of >> =E2=80=98--force=E2=80=99. WDYT? After giving some more thoughts and after more experience with the process I do agree that exposing `--force' parameter into grub-configuration is good = idea. I'm filing bug for that. --vv4Sf/kQfcwinyKX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlT+3KEACgkQ37XrCapiVCMWpACfSVJbg63+THwkhNKavc6APZrt kWEAmgNur5/CPQHZFDO6An1ktHBk3Cd0 =Fo3z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vv4Sf/kQfcwinyKX-- From unknown Mon Jun 23 06:01:14 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#20071: Bug Hunting: status? References: <20150310115930.GG16813@crashnator.suse.cz> In-Reply-To: <20150310115930.GG16813@crashnator.suse.cz> Resent-From: zimoun Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 20:23:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20071 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 20071@debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , sleep_walker@suse.cz Received: via spool by 20071-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20071.15735901294321 (code B ref 20071); Tue, 12 Nov 2019 20:23:01 +0000 Received: (at 20071) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Nov 2019 20:22:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58431 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iUcfx-00017d-64 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 15:22:09 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-f173.google.com ([209.85.222.173]:47056) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iUcfv-00017O-0W for 20071@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 15:22:07 -0500 Received: by mail-qk1-f173.google.com with SMTP id h15so15648282qka.13 for <20071@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 12:22:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=BmS65V6EbMTlhzlEA+9H77d2orf2Z5fomjmO8ozadgY=; b=hcEV7mFn6QHah7ZAlwMtQ8kzuku1SQ9K+WPdAsIoJu0CSVV+pCIUPLIqGFSLnDRZNK eeBlHiA6WdG6l3g+SGJMUUQQlSJAtirpaVMpi4S5wnjOGa3FIcsGFpp0BAoihm0bXzza pkPFVcbegMBP+33QaKNd5lkebRJTc610AH1Qf/B1sVHdAvgWGpve2gYUj8YNDLIIjVDY 1TTVOB5iKr/zjhNPZZvx495zEutEJLjHmUBhhIG0sffvzV29a8AKuDHcTaUKag72AyfV aonmjP/E2zsDyAQFilsX804cesXMBjSVufu3EP98a5KqKxuYoBhU9HFWMPc9bSEJZyss xfAw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=BmS65V6EbMTlhzlEA+9H77d2orf2Z5fomjmO8ozadgY=; b=PKcSf7GUbu3Je+Gt419xCbgF0kj0fAaNSvkxof1pbvYqu6s6kQyJD5XxzFnmkCe2Ol hsjqZPLT56RDBUgHHpYoc3wwwaJ5dYWnvVPMDUiX2ogmxbWzgp+QYFV9jwuuCAsVFrHt sBwUafVWReBR0UAIHK8lFFp/1GShe+MDnZp4tN5c7uBS275QIFrQZQuf7M4C8LkK1D6c 1OM7GYJjPE4+XoaxucNCjXTjm6uONeQ6tp0LhsRStcNIciUyUmrdFsoarbA5Oq/Bha2s nJJ/lu+tnQN9rrY8lzBxBfVgnMUJhrr5L3Zb7cq5dqZUObZEdzd+9woJfOqGuDRGufq5 VOdQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWp4lcweSFtBDSOHNJA1VgbFIbb8jc25lSSEZc6nrxPW2SfDdw7 QgpELesBnau6alkWJO4Nip5AKIvvH3J6LJlfY43FPg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyN5qXrCkGkT43HQOXolUUGif5YweSjWTqfJHeM2g9kynMrqIfshKZlqhyS7xEuKykIWvkO32NbOYzugSH7/Xo= X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:1279:: with SMTP id b25mr2043369qkl.201.1573590121314; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 12:22:01 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: zimoun Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 21:21:50 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Dear, This bug is pending since more than 4 years. Does it still apply? If yes, any progress to report? If no, does it make sense to close it? Thanks in advance. All the bets, simon From unknown Mon Jun 23 06:01:14 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#20071: Bug Hunting: status? Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 13:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20071 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: zimoun Cc: sleep_walker@suse.cz, 20071@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 20071-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20071.157365224726436 (code B ref 20071); Wed, 13 Nov 2019 13:38:02 +0000 Received: (at 20071) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Nov 2019 13:37:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58918 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iUspq-0006sK-L8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 08:37:26 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36051) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iUspo-0006s7-Po for 20071@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 08:37:25 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:57175) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iUspj-0001KW-5H; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 08:37:19 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=38954 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iUspi-0006kS-LH; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 08:37:18 -0500 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 23 Brumaire an 228 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 14:37:16 +0100 In-Reply-To: (zimoun's message of "Tue, 12 Nov 2019 21:21:50 +0100") Message-ID: <8736erq4mr.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi, zimoun skribis: > This bug is pending since more than 4 years. Does it still apply? The wishlist item at is about adding a =E2=80=9Cforce=E2=80=9D flag for the GRUB configuration. Do you still think that would make sense, Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. PS: zimoun, could you include the bug title and/or URL in the reminders you send, to make it easier to see what this is about? (Besides, thanks a lot for doing bug triage!) From unknown Mon Jun 23 06:01:14 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#20071: Bug Hunting: status? Resent-From: zimoun Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 15:32:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20071 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: sleep_walker@suse.cz, 20071@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 20071-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20071.157365911420772 (code B ref 20071); Wed, 13 Nov 2019 15:32:02 +0000 Received: (at 20071) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Nov 2019 15:31:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59992 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iUucb-0005Oy-NY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 10:31:53 -0500 Received: from mail-qv1-f49.google.com ([209.85.219.49]:41870) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iUucY-0005Oh-7a for 20071@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 10:31:52 -0500 Received: by mail-qv1-f49.google.com with SMTP id g18so960093qvp.8 for <20071@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 07:31:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fnCxgc1Go5GAHNSP1uRgynDWXxk3ItL4nwmm4naQrF4=; b=Hu/fzx0nCmrOMDgd3gjnj10mb2GejffkzSBK/H/mX9ba5e8O6U2bYP94f5zoVw5FD+ dRBMTp/LDT5WAOo9EmGP+1/p3DA6fInTRy9lSmLrEjfU6r+PgpK3KuFQsFYY9C5xRQtA tuN6nnodihvwZ426yGsgOwGfeco7YDJyNg5lNaIRLPv2LXgU/GilJlN+b8v2bWd4n2BE JKnwQV3OaeERD/XCQKKtr3Z58Y+92etuRrCDV6wKiSN+vFFhJf2r5IAmti+ru2DdUWDs 0bavMR4QiN+t38oEcVwa1HGmzz4NmoG3JdcvS4y1m5xzcrs/+Ku+AUbx2ojckCI0Ghyv KmjA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fnCxgc1Go5GAHNSP1uRgynDWXxk3ItL4nwmm4naQrF4=; b=KjnIjOgSdx1L1pAid6Hu67yUwz+767tuSWZYt9je++vOrhJeF+t//IJKO1cWC0gC36 Xuobkufo1XAyaqI1WBkwZFB8goGBW+/GmHiwkiA+IZN1byta+bJZXmXflTfo5hrZaX01 3ZgzC9CcQQNJJeejBjbeE/WbJTL7o8yFQ9ltW0uC5LHjW6J7EMw13SxSogABlvOs731M dxQeESytsNNJGzZuB0LiIQw6QN4tHNY/X9KqpGAPa1pYTbvmRBCZijDCbPEfCSatuz4M 8S8Ioqs/U49KU1s/DBAZRldrOlfnd7y7F3KjffY4d6M4+Rza99YbwEiojr1OJozd1WRB Wurw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW6C0L60rGL7jvS754D85OKVh/isTxEBsIVz5alNdNJVOkXQxw9 uI+TEPagusBzBkx4+JEyzQUAhNizdxo5DIXrc+0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyeDKWFgvollQQeploIyRBsQGpwjhc6tB+C/AoHOlabYQQgSZKv9291UGuTAgH5NCX1gf2RnD9vMPK7NJBbaRk= X-Received: by 2002:ad4:4c4a:: with SMTP id cs10mr3419256qvb.6.1573659104764; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 07:31:44 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <8736erq4mr.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <8736erq4mr.fsf@gnu.org> From: zimoun Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 16:31:33 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On Wed, 13 Nov 2019 at 14:37, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > Do you still think that would make sense, Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1? The email address used by Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1 returned "address not found". An= d yesterday I asked to Sleep_Walker on IRC (assuming same nick =3D same person :-)) what is the new address to report. > PS: zimoun, could you include the bug title and/or URL in the reminders My bad! :-) Because I am doing directly from Emacs, the bug number appeared to me enough to reach it easily (via `debbugs-gnu-bugs'). Next round, I will write clearer Subject than "Bug Hunting: status?" ;-) and provide URL to ease the triage. Thank you. simon From unknown Mon Jun 23 06:01:14 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: =?UTF-8?Q?Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=C4=8Cech?= Subject: bug#20071: closed (Re: Bug Hunting: status?) Message-ID: References: <20150310115930.GG16813@crashnator.suse.cz> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 20071 X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix Reply-To: 20071@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 17:37:02 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1574271422-18173-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1574271422-18173-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #20071: grub-configuration needs a "force" flag which was filed against the guix package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 20071@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 20071: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D20071 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1574271422-18173-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 20071-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Nov 2019 17:36:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50834 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iXTuV-0004it-Ie for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 12:36:59 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-f172.google.com ([209.85.222.172]:34997) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iXTuU-0004ih-7X for 20071-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 12:36:58 -0500 Received: by mail-qk1-f172.google.com with SMTP id i19so548093qki.2 for <20071-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 09:36:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=hY++DRx6dYUQTJjhcYBTMq9lyEVdW0JxCi4oyUeIqjU=; b=dLphlpr3XlEZSdFbXMqVQbyekDqM5KK3iRh2b9tHQhpb6MfklnVurNDEgYF0mBT645 ZMRb0F8znGnbHGn5dED829VG4HsvAzkH6OJ7WAXS8QuGpy0DxK4P7puGvQROAQEmuR12 aMkbAlGFJU1+b0HVXx0YWll7h21UAnJBkwPI1Lmiy2ivgstkBmhd5Q/musJKKWMs+wgg 8+RjRh6lxF54JcvsSPc+aufvzR6urd8u9OYzgImQEIHjTckdrprcu7mM19Zuyvr5rJ3k o3eJo32Bx+x9cyo/nkkOKpZL2ltmYoOrGW7wnd1PMe+EhGylUIir7GDf0LQqppRUpnTG m5hw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hY++DRx6dYUQTJjhcYBTMq9lyEVdW0JxCi4oyUeIqjU=; b=I3bBuYPbl5GnKFucs0wwAExs0CBF5YTIiGnsy5xoEqOmTtJZqyEMtYbB7vKxaOiw0h GGzcpSantUtG3dUTki9a2ZHEBW++juP4AUNso3azRaY5ILBy4E8xFzZQHoa5F0D6fDbX Gt6Ood9ZxtEmgKA1GG6WVcgyh6x0Lf5uZx1+uK/8WI2IWsSRIXAGKkNj+CTkp8eH3FTD PVJNEDKcKSc+3Ydv3nBn92+qMfU4moLHFoXON8ETUL2jMFPIk3cWaHHfW1t41us/jJZn v9hFLTnOX5rTAQoMK0TBFuOdVRrv0M/Ba1MJsFnAh+vgM7j7FoCSB81W5m5GoiV/mYkf lnkA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXqDBVkFfSFBH4o/sqhN0E5lWWhsd6CzakR1EQIxxpaGqPsqPN/ NbeWhPQjLpXceOGHgFzIVlc74cGXWSnhkFSLnGXquw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzU1KFsXP/nr7RUxuSetOsuFL49nEEYJV08NHfN4x74vs6uQAgnFPm4GZ/zRGEaJ5jOIlYjLB/vsBZmeQdo2n0= X-Received: by 2002:a37:584:: with SMTP id 126mr3216129qkf.304.1574271412452; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 09:36:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <8736erq4mr.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: From: zimoun Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 18:36:41 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Bug Hunting: status? To: 20071-done@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 20071-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Dear, On Wed, 13 Nov 2019 at 16:31, zimoun wrote: > > On Wed, 13 Nov 2019 at 14:37, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > > > Do you still think that would make sense, Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1? > > The email address used by Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1 returned "address not found". = And > yesterday I asked to Sleep_Walker on IRC (assuming same nick =3D same > person :-)) what is the new address to report. > If this wishlist bug still makes senses, please re-open it. Thank you. ------------=_1574271422-18173-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Mar 2015 11:59:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41288 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YVIp9-0001q2-PK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 07:59:48 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57075) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YVIp7-0001pl-Tt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 07:59:46 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YVIp1-0007CB-EI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 07:59:40 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:38507) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YVIp1-0007C7-CF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 07:59:39 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58773) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YVIoy-0006ac-UL for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 07:59:39 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YVIot-0007Ax-SZ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 07:59:36 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:59374 helo=mx2.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YVIot-0007As-Lc; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 07:59:31 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay1.suse.de (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AF39AC6E; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 11:59:31 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 12:59:30 +0100 From: =?utf-8?B?VG9tw6HFoSDEjGVjaA==?= To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: Re: none Message-ID: <20150310115930.GG16813@crashnator.suse.cz> References: <87a9347gtj.wl%sleep_walker@suse.cz> <87wq67qao8.fsf@gnu.org> <874mta7au9.wl%sleep_walker@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vv4Sf/kQfcwinyKX" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <874mta7au9.wl%sleep_walker@suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2011-07-01) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x (no timestamps) [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) --vv4Sf/kQfcwinyKX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 09:35:42AM +0100, Tomas Cech wrote: >At Fri, 05 Dec 2014 00:04:23 +0100, >Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> >> Tomas Cech skribis: >> >> > I tried to install Guix as alternative OS to my Gentoo and openSUSE >> > installations to give a try. I tried unsupported scenario - >> > installation on LVM volume and separate /boot partition until I was >> > told it is unsupported. Separate boot wasn't hard as I had to just >> > copy generated files so they are loaded. >> >> OK, but there=E2=80=99s still an open bug on that topic. :-) >> http://bugs.gnu.org/19220 > >Good, I'll give a try again. > >> > 1] if you set device to partition (and not to disk) in your grub-confi= guration like this: >> > >> > (bootloader (grub-configuration >> > (device "/dev/sda4"))) >> >> Why would you want to use a partition and not a disk? I didn=E2=80=99t = know >> this was even possible. > >Because this way I can separate Grub managed by Guix and Grub from my >Gentoo. As I'm playing with that on my notebook I need for work, this >way can reduce risks. > >I'm not sure how Guix installer can manipulate with grub.cfg and I'd >like to always have some working system... > >> >> > `guix system init' will fail on grub installation. By default Grub >> > tries to fit in the beginning of partition and fails if it can't fit >> > in. I asked about this behaviour on Grub mailing list and it seems >> > that there are two options: >> > >> > a] add `--force' to command line and use block list for keeping info= rmation about position of Grub's core.img >> > b] use filesystem which allows embedding - BtrFS or ZFS >> > >> > I verified both options (a] and then b] with BtrFS) and it no longer f= ails. >> > >> > But, >> > ad a] - I don't feel safe passing `--force' to grub-install every >> > time. So if installation fails on this point and you'd like to use >> > your FS anyway, you can pass `--no-grub' to `guix system init' and >> > then rung grub-install manually. >> > >> > ad b] - I don't feel safe using still experimental BtrFS. >> >> OK. I think the conclusion for Guix is to leave the defaults unchanged. >> Perhaps we could add a =E2=80=98force?=E2=80=99 field to the =E2=80=98gr= ub-configuration=E2=80=99 data >> type to allow those who know what they doing to get the effect of >> =E2=80=98--force=E2=80=99. WDYT? After giving some more thoughts and after more experience with the process I do agree that exposing `--force' parameter into grub-configuration is good = idea. I'm filing bug for that. --vv4Sf/kQfcwinyKX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlT+3KEACgkQ37XrCapiVCMWpACfSVJbg63+THwkhNKavc6APZrt kWEAmgNur5/CPQHZFDO6An1ktHBk3Cd0 =Fo3z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vv4Sf/kQfcwinyKX-- ------------=_1574271422-18173-1--