From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Mar 10 07:59:48 2015 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Mar 2015 11:59:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41288 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YVIp9-0001q2-PK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 07:59:48 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57075) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YVIp7-0001pl-Tt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 07:59:46 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YVIp1-0007CB-EI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 07:59:40 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:38507) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YVIp1-0007C7-CF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 07:59:39 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58773) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YVIoy-0006ac-UL for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 07:59:39 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YVIot-0007Ax-SZ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 07:59:36 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:59374 helo=mx2.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YVIot-0007As-Lc; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 07:59:31 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay1.suse.de (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AF39AC6E; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 11:59:31 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 12:59:30 +0100 From: =?utf-8?B?VG9tw6HFoSDEjGVjaA==?= To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: Re: none Message-ID: <20150310115930.GG16813@crashnator.suse.cz> References: <87a9347gtj.wl%sleep_walker@suse.cz> <87wq67qao8.fsf@gnu.org> <874mta7au9.wl%sleep_walker@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vv4Sf/kQfcwinyKX" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <874mta7au9.wl%sleep_walker@suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2011-07-01) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x (no timestamps) [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) --vv4Sf/kQfcwinyKX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 09:35:42AM +0100, Tomas Cech wrote: >At Fri, 05 Dec 2014 00:04:23 +0100, >Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> >> Tomas Cech skribis: >> >> > I tried to install Guix as alternative OS to my Gentoo and openSUSE >> > installations to give a try. I tried unsupported scenario - >> > installation on LVM volume and separate /boot partition until I was >> > told it is unsupported. Separate boot wasn't hard as I had to just >> > copy generated files so they are loaded. >> >> OK, but there=E2=80=99s still an open bug on that topic. :-) >> http://bugs.gnu.org/19220 > >Good, I'll give a try again. > >> > 1] if you set device to partition (and not to disk) in your grub-confi= guration like this: >> > >> > (bootloader (grub-configuration >> > (device "/dev/sda4"))) >> >> Why would you want to use a partition and not a disk? I didn=E2=80=99t = know >> this was even possible. > >Because this way I can separate Grub managed by Guix and Grub from my >Gentoo. As I'm playing with that on my notebook I need for work, this >way can reduce risks. > >I'm not sure how Guix installer can manipulate with grub.cfg and I'd >like to always have some working system... > >> >> > `guix system init' will fail on grub installation. By default Grub >> > tries to fit in the beginning of partition and fails if it can't fit >> > in. I asked about this behaviour on Grub mailing list and it seems >> > that there are two options: >> > >> > a] add `--force' to command line and use block list for keeping info= rmation about position of Grub's core.img >> > b] use filesystem which allows embedding - BtrFS or ZFS >> > >> > I verified both options (a] and then b] with BtrFS) and it no longer f= ails. >> > >> > But, >> > ad a] - I don't feel safe passing `--force' to grub-install every >> > time. So if installation fails on this point and you'd like to use >> > your FS anyway, you can pass `--no-grub' to `guix system init' and >> > then rung grub-install manually. >> > >> > ad b] - I don't feel safe using still experimental BtrFS. >> >> OK. I think the conclusion for Guix is to leave the defaults unchanged. >> Perhaps we could add a =E2=80=98force?=E2=80=99 field to the =E2=80=98gr= ub-configuration=E2=80=99 data >> type to allow those who know what they doing to get the effect of >> =E2=80=98--force=E2=80=99. WDYT? After giving some more thoughts and after more experience with the process I do agree that exposing `--force' parameter into grub-configuration is good = idea. I'm filing bug for that. --vv4Sf/kQfcwinyKX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlT+3KEACgkQ37XrCapiVCMWpACfSVJbg63+THwkhNKavc6APZrt kWEAmgNur5/CPQHZFDO6An1ktHBk3Cd0 =Fo3z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vv4Sf/kQfcwinyKX-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Mar 22 18:49:55 2015 Received: (at request) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Mar 2015 22:49:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32810 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YZogt-0005zw-Kb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 18:49:55 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:48406 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YZogr-0005zp-O8 for request@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 18:49:53 -0400 Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:60823 helo=pluto) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YZogr-0006Au-6f for request@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 18:49:53 -0400 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: request@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: thing Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 23:49:51 +0100 Message-ID: <874mpcy7e8.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: request X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) retitle 20071 grub-configuration needs a "force" flag thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Nov 12 15:22:09 2019 Received: (at 20071) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Nov 2019 20:22:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58431 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iUcfx-00017d-64 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 15:22:09 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-f173.google.com ([209.85.222.173]:47056) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iUcfv-00017O-0W for 20071@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 15:22:07 -0500 Received: by mail-qk1-f173.google.com with SMTP id h15so15648282qka.13 for <20071@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 12:22:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=BmS65V6EbMTlhzlEA+9H77d2orf2Z5fomjmO8ozadgY=; b=hcEV7mFn6QHah7ZAlwMtQ8kzuku1SQ9K+WPdAsIoJu0CSVV+pCIUPLIqGFSLnDRZNK eeBlHiA6WdG6l3g+SGJMUUQQlSJAtirpaVMpi4S5wnjOGa3FIcsGFpp0BAoihm0bXzza pkPFVcbegMBP+33QaKNd5lkebRJTc610AH1Qf/B1sVHdAvgWGpve2gYUj8YNDLIIjVDY 1TTVOB5iKr/zjhNPZZvx495zEutEJLjHmUBhhIG0sffvzV29a8AKuDHcTaUKag72AyfV aonmjP/E2zsDyAQFilsX804cesXMBjSVufu3EP98a5KqKxuYoBhU9HFWMPc9bSEJZyss xfAw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=BmS65V6EbMTlhzlEA+9H77d2orf2Z5fomjmO8ozadgY=; b=PKcSf7GUbu3Je+Gt419xCbgF0kj0fAaNSvkxof1pbvYqu6s6kQyJD5XxzFnmkCe2Ol hsjqZPLT56RDBUgHHpYoc3wwwaJ5dYWnvVPMDUiX2ogmxbWzgp+QYFV9jwuuCAsVFrHt sBwUafVWReBR0UAIHK8lFFp/1GShe+MDnZp4tN5c7uBS275QIFrQZQuf7M4C8LkK1D6c 1OM7GYJjPE4+XoaxucNCjXTjm6uONeQ6tp0LhsRStcNIciUyUmrdFsoarbA5Oq/Bha2s nJJ/lu+tnQN9rrY8lzBxBfVgnMUJhrr5L3Zb7cq5dqZUObZEdzd+9woJfOqGuDRGufq5 VOdQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWp4lcweSFtBDSOHNJA1VgbFIbb8jc25lSSEZc6nrxPW2SfDdw7 QgpELesBnau6alkWJO4Nip5AKIvvH3J6LJlfY43FPg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyN5qXrCkGkT43HQOXolUUGif5YweSjWTqfJHeM2g9kynMrqIfshKZlqhyS7xEuKykIWvkO32NbOYzugSH7/Xo= X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:1279:: with SMTP id b25mr2043369qkl.201.1573590121314; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 12:22:01 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: zimoun Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 21:21:50 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Bug Hunting: status? To: 20071@debbugs.gnu.org, =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= , sleep_walker@suse.cz Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 20071 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Dear, This bug is pending since more than 4 years. Does it still apply? If yes, any progress to report? If no, does it make sense to close it? Thanks in advance. All the bets, simon From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 13 08:37:26 2019 Received: (at 20071) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Nov 2019 13:37:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58918 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iUspq-0006sK-L8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 08:37:26 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36051) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iUspo-0006s7-Po for 20071@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 08:37:25 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:57175) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iUspj-0001KW-5H; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 08:37:19 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=38954 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iUspi-0006kS-LH; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 08:37:18 -0500 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: zimoun Subject: Re: Bug Hunting: status? References: X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 23 Brumaire an 228 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 14:37:16 +0100 In-Reply-To: (zimoun's message of "Tue, 12 Nov 2019 21:21:50 +0100") Message-ID: <8736erq4mr.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 20071 Cc: sleep_walker@suse.cz, 20071@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi, zimoun skribis: > This bug is pending since more than 4 years. Does it still apply? The wishlist item at is about adding a =E2=80=9Cforce=E2=80=9D flag for the GRUB configuration. Do you still think that would make sense, Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. PS: zimoun, could you include the bug title and/or URL in the reminders you send, to make it easier to see what this is about? (Besides, thanks a lot for doing bug triage!) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 13 10:31:54 2019 Received: (at 20071) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Nov 2019 15:31:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59992 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iUucb-0005Oy-NY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 10:31:53 -0500 Received: from mail-qv1-f49.google.com ([209.85.219.49]:41870) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iUucY-0005Oh-7a for 20071@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 10:31:52 -0500 Received: by mail-qv1-f49.google.com with SMTP id g18so960093qvp.8 for <20071@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 07:31:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fnCxgc1Go5GAHNSP1uRgynDWXxk3ItL4nwmm4naQrF4=; b=Hu/fzx0nCmrOMDgd3gjnj10mb2GejffkzSBK/H/mX9ba5e8O6U2bYP94f5zoVw5FD+ dRBMTp/LDT5WAOo9EmGP+1/p3DA6fInTRy9lSmLrEjfU6r+PgpK3KuFQsFYY9C5xRQtA tuN6nnodihvwZ426yGsgOwGfeco7YDJyNg5lNaIRLPv2LXgU/GilJlN+b8v2bWd4n2BE JKnwQV3OaeERD/XCQKKtr3Z58Y+92etuRrCDV6wKiSN+vFFhJf2r5IAmti+ru2DdUWDs 0bavMR4QiN+t38oEcVwa1HGmzz4NmoG3JdcvS4y1m5xzcrs/+Ku+AUbx2ojckCI0Ghyv KmjA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fnCxgc1Go5GAHNSP1uRgynDWXxk3ItL4nwmm4naQrF4=; b=KjnIjOgSdx1L1pAid6Hu67yUwz+767tuSWZYt9je++vOrhJeF+t//IJKO1cWC0gC36 Xuobkufo1XAyaqI1WBkwZFB8goGBW+/GmHiwkiA+IZN1byta+bJZXmXflTfo5hrZaX01 3ZgzC9CcQQNJJeejBjbeE/WbJTL7o8yFQ9ltW0uC5LHjW6J7EMw13SxSogABlvOs731M dxQeESytsNNJGzZuB0LiIQw6QN4tHNY/X9KqpGAPa1pYTbvmRBCZijDCbPEfCSatuz4M 8S8Ioqs/U49KU1s/DBAZRldrOlfnd7y7F3KjffY4d6M4+Rza99YbwEiojr1OJozd1WRB Wurw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW6C0L60rGL7jvS754D85OKVh/isTxEBsIVz5alNdNJVOkXQxw9 uI+TEPagusBzBkx4+JEyzQUAhNizdxo5DIXrc+0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyeDKWFgvollQQeploIyRBsQGpwjhc6tB+C/AoHOlabYQQgSZKv9291UGuTAgH5NCX1gf2RnD9vMPK7NJBbaRk= X-Received: by 2002:ad4:4c4a:: with SMTP id cs10mr3419256qvb.6.1573659104764; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 07:31:44 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <8736erq4mr.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <8736erq4mr.fsf@gnu.org> From: zimoun Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 16:31:33 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Bug Hunting: status? To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 20071 Cc: sleep_walker@suse.cz, 20071@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On Wed, 13 Nov 2019 at 14:37, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > Do you still think that would make sense, Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1? The email address used by Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1 returned "address not found". An= d yesterday I asked to Sleep_Walker on IRC (assuming same nick =3D same person :-)) what is the new address to report. > PS: zimoun, could you include the bug title and/or URL in the reminders My bad! :-) Because I am doing directly from Emacs, the bug number appeared to me enough to reach it easily (via `debbugs-gnu-bugs'). Next round, I will write clearer Subject than "Bug Hunting: status?" ;-) and provide URL to ease the triage. Thank you. simon From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 20 12:36:59 2019 Received: (at 20071-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Nov 2019 17:36:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50834 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iXTuV-0004it-Ie for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 12:36:59 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-f172.google.com ([209.85.222.172]:34997) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iXTuU-0004ih-7X for 20071-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 12:36:58 -0500 Received: by mail-qk1-f172.google.com with SMTP id i19so548093qki.2 for <20071-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 09:36:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=hY++DRx6dYUQTJjhcYBTMq9lyEVdW0JxCi4oyUeIqjU=; b=dLphlpr3XlEZSdFbXMqVQbyekDqM5KK3iRh2b9tHQhpb6MfklnVurNDEgYF0mBT645 ZMRb0F8znGnbHGn5dED829VG4HsvAzkH6OJ7WAXS8QuGpy0DxK4P7puGvQROAQEmuR12 aMkbAlGFJU1+b0HVXx0YWll7h21UAnJBkwPI1Lmiy2ivgstkBmhd5Q/musJKKWMs+wgg 8+RjRh6lxF54JcvsSPc+aufvzR6urd8u9OYzgImQEIHjTckdrprcu7mM19Zuyvr5rJ3k o3eJo32Bx+x9cyo/nkkOKpZL2ltmYoOrGW7wnd1PMe+EhGylUIir7GDf0LQqppRUpnTG m5hw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hY++DRx6dYUQTJjhcYBTMq9lyEVdW0JxCi4oyUeIqjU=; b=I3bBuYPbl5GnKFucs0wwAExs0CBF5YTIiGnsy5xoEqOmTtJZqyEMtYbB7vKxaOiw0h GGzcpSantUtG3dUTki9a2ZHEBW++juP4AUNso3azRaY5ILBy4E8xFzZQHoa5F0D6fDbX Gt6Ood9ZxtEmgKA1GG6WVcgyh6x0Lf5uZx1+uK/8WI2IWsSRIXAGKkNj+CTkp8eH3FTD PVJNEDKcKSc+3Ydv3nBn92+qMfU4moLHFoXON8ETUL2jMFPIk3cWaHHfW1t41us/jJZn v9hFLTnOX5rTAQoMK0TBFuOdVRrv0M/Ba1MJsFnAh+vgM7j7FoCSB81W5m5GoiV/mYkf lnkA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXqDBVkFfSFBH4o/sqhN0E5lWWhsd6CzakR1EQIxxpaGqPsqPN/ NbeWhPQjLpXceOGHgFzIVlc74cGXWSnhkFSLnGXquw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzU1KFsXP/nr7RUxuSetOsuFL49nEEYJV08NHfN4x74vs6uQAgnFPm4GZ/zRGEaJ5jOIlYjLB/vsBZmeQdo2n0= X-Received: by 2002:a37:584:: with SMTP id 126mr3216129qkf.304.1574271412452; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 09:36:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <8736erq4mr.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: From: zimoun Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 18:36:41 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Bug Hunting: status? To: 20071-done@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 20071-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Dear, On Wed, 13 Nov 2019 at 16:31, zimoun wrote: > > On Wed, 13 Nov 2019 at 14:37, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > > > Do you still think that would make sense, Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1? > > The email address used by Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1 returned "address not found". = And > yesterday I asked to Sleep_Walker on IRC (assuming same nick =3D same > person :-)) what is the new address to report. > If this wishlist bug still makes senses, please re-open it. Thank you. From unknown Mon Jun 23 06:00:24 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 12:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator