From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Mar 06 11:45:35 2015 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Mar 2015 16:45:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37715 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YTvNX-0002S6-6q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 11:45:35 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36557) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YTslh-00068D-V8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 08:58:22 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTslY-0003lJ-Vd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 08:58:16 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:34457) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTslY-0003lF-TL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 08:58:12 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38188) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTslU-0002SL-Hd for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 08:58:12 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTslR-0003iS-4I for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 08:58:08 -0500 Received: from e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com ([195.75.94.110]:43400) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTslQ-0003fa-Pt for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 08:58:05 -0500 Received: from /spool/local by e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 13:57:59 -0000 Received: from d06dlp01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.20.13) by e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.144) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 13:57:58 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay13.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.198]) by d06dlp01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 643D617D8042 for ; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 13:58:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av06.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av06.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.217]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id t26DvwNk1507764 for ; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 13:57:58 GMT Received: from d06av06.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d06av06.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id t268r9B2023516 for ; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 03:53:09 -0500 Received: from [9.83.200.232] (sig-9-83-200-232.evts.uk.ibm.com [9.83.200.232]) by d06av06.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id t268r9Oo023490 for ; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 03:53:09 -0500 Message-ID: <54F9B264.8070106@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 14:57:56 +0100 From: Normand User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bug-guile@gnu.org Subject: guile 2.0.11 make check failure for ppc architecture Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 15030613-0017-0000-0000-000003421E12 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 11:45:34 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) guile 2.0.11 make check failure for ppc architecture on opensuse 13.2 details of the log is available at: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory:PowerPC/guile https://build.opensuse.org/build/openSUSE:Factory:PowerPC/standard/ppc/guile/_log There are two failing tests: === [ 1223s] FAIL: fractions.test: fractions: (eqv? (expt 2 1/2) (sqrt 2)) [ 1223s] FAIL: fractions.test: fractions: (eqv? (expt 2.0 1/2) (sqrt 2)) === I have a guest on which I am able to recreate the problem, but I do not know anything about guile to do investigation of the problem. any suggestions ? -- Michel Normand From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 23 07:45:24 2016 Received: (at 20017) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jun 2016 11:45:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51849 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bG34W-0005v6-J6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 07:45:24 -0400 Received: from pb-sasl1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.66]:64007 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bG34U-0005ux-J7 for 20017@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 07:45:23 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8851216B2; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 07:45:21 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=9JIfncOU/sPSWZBBAwAd8k2L+DE=; b=SNJmON M6oVN5Naj4C2ORArG/EfJo+cDmN3V8wzdUvIR3NGqTufNYRd49KKQVSnXl67fI+G qxgszIiv2uPGSzVJ3MFZcriHTJ2l9ptSS18Ce0HIU0/rUpaFmk0878oavQzRc45d 0jqbfeXzzFY7y2VNJieus3yyl+sb+WwyPD1Ec= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=wr3eQ43C8NQRTWqSh8uHUJ5ayDEPAGjN kbcOrvx0Vm9D9S4cG+tICXwJS8cu1IwHBguvDrQS/j5MWRK68+0zZ4tzOhfUB96/ h13i9+g7Km0LmtijBDWgdI7ccDZxamlzJ0lTdxz1GamVN59DIy6zAcQ47akcnIMm 8qSMS5Ig+Qc= Received: from pb-sasl1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C06F7216AF; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 07:45:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from clucks (unknown [88.160.190.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0CDD7216A4; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 07:45:20 -0400 (EDT) From: Andy Wingo To: Normand Subject: Re: bug#20017: guile 2.0.11 make check failure for ppc architecture References: <54F9B264.8070106@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 13:45:13 +0200 In-Reply-To: <54F9B264.8070106@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (normand@linux.vnet.ibm.com's message of "Fri, 06 Mar 2015 14:57:56 +0100") Message-ID: <8737o4p1rq.fsf@pobox.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: F70B00C2-3937-11E6-B06E-C1836462E9F6-02397024!pb-sasl1.pobox.com X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 20017 Cc: 20017@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) Hi :) On Fri 06 Mar 2015 14:57, Normand writes: > guile 2.0.11 make check failure for ppc architecture on opensuse 13.2 > > details of the log is available at: > https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory:PowerPC/guile > https://build.opensuse.org/build/openSUSE:Factory:PowerPC/standard/ppc/guile/_log > > There are two failing tests: > === > [ 1223s] FAIL: fractions.test: fractions: (eqv? (expt 2 1/2) (sqrt 2)) > [ 1223s] FAIL: fractions.test: fractions: (eqv? (expt 2.0 1/2) (sqrt 2)) > === > > I have a guest on which I am able to recreate the problem, > but I do not know anything about guile to do investigation of the problem. > > any suggestions ? Sorry for the 15 month delay! Our bad. On the other hand we're finally about to cut a 2.0.12 so it would be nice to fix this. Can you still find this condition? If so can you run Guile and type these expressions at the console: (expt 2 1/2) (expt 2.0 1/2) (sqrt 2) and attach the log of what you type and what Guile says in response? Thanks! Andy From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 23 11:28:48 2016 Received: (at 20017) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jun 2016 15:28:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52828 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bG6Yh-0004xf-Ob for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 11:28:47 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:60356) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bG6Yg-0004xX-61 for 20017@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 11:28:46 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098396.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.11/8.16.0.11) with SMTP id u5NFNUTn145837 for <20017@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 11:28:44 -0400 Received: from e06smtp06.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp06.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.102]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 23qcxftm9m-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <20017@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 11:28:44 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp06.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for <20017@debbugs.gnu.org> from ; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 16:28:42 +0100 Received: from d06dlp02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.20.14) by e06smtp06.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.136) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 16:28:41 +0100 X-IBM-Helo: d06dlp02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com X-IBM-MailFrom: normand@linux.vnet.ibm.com X-IBM-RcptTo: 20017@debbugs.gnu.org Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay13.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.198]) by d06dlp02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A6352190056 for <20017@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 16:28:11 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av05.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av05.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.229]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id u5NFSesO7733678 for <20017@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:28:40 GMT Received: from d06av05.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d06av05.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id u5NFSemc032150 for <20017@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 09:28:40 -0600 Received: from [9.81.126.38] (sig-9-81-126-38.evts.de.ibm.com [9.81.126.38]) by d06av05.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id u5NFSd0j032121; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 09:28:39 -0600 Subject: Re: bug#20017: guile 2.0.11 make check failure for ppc architecture To: Andy Wingo References: <54F9B264.8070106@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <8737o4p1rq.fsf@pobox.com> From: Normand Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 17:28:39 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8737o4p1rq.fsf@pobox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 16062315-0024-0000-0000-000001E5F7BC X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 16062315-0025-0000-0000-00001F64C265 Message-Id: <576C0027.10502@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2016-06-23_07:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=1 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1604210000 definitions=main-1606230163 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 20017 Cc: 20017@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) On 23/06/2016 13:45, Andy Wingo wrote: > Hi :) > > On Fri 06 Mar 2015 14:57, Normand writes: > >> guile 2.0.11 make check failure for ppc architecture on opensuse 13.2 >> >> details of the log is available at: >> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory:PowerPC/guile >> https://build.opensuse.org/build/openSUSE:Factory:PowerPC/standard/ppc/guile/_log >> >> There are two failing tests: >> === >> [ 1223s] FAIL: fractions.test: fractions: (eqv? (expt 2 1/2) (sqrt 2)) >> [ 1223s] FAIL: fractions.test: fractions: (eqv? (expt 2.0 1/2) (sqrt 2)) >> === >> >> I have a guest on which I am able to recreate the problem, >> but I do not know anything about guile to do investigation of the problem. >> >> any suggestions ? > > Sorry for the 15 month delay! Our bad. On the other hand we're finally > about to cut a 2.0.12 so it would be nice to fix this. Can you still > find this condition? If so can you run Guile and type these expressions > at the console: > > (expt 2 1/2) > (expt 2.0 1/2) > (sqrt 2) > > and attach the log of what you type and what Guile says in response? > > Thanks! > > Andy > > The bugzilla should probably be closed now, because since then it seems that problem disapeared. If I do the manual tests as suggested there is no differences in expressions outputs as reported below. === === [michel@twppc64:~/work/devel:languages:misc/guile] $osc chroot standard ppc --alternative-project=openSUSE:Factory:PowerPC ... abuild@twppc64:~/rpmbuild/BUILD/guile-2.0.11> ./meta/guile GNU Guile 2.0.11 Copyright (C) 1995-2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc. Guile comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `,show w'. This program is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions; type `,show c' for details. Enter `,help' for help. scheme@(guile-user)> (expt 2 1/2) $1 = 1.4142135623730951 scheme@(guile-user)> (expt 2.0 1/2) $2 = 1.4142135623730951 scheme@(guile-user)> (sqrt 2) $3 = 1.4142135623730951 === abuild@twppc64:~/rpmbuild/BUILD/guile-2.0.11> file ./libguile/.libs/guile ./libguile/.libs/guile: ELF 32-bit MSB executable, PowerPC or cisco 4500, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, interpreter /lib/ld.so.1, for GNU/Linux 3.0.0, BuildID[sha1]=767e0bee60d5b5a85db6fd8b83e01ef19ce33e45, not stripped === -- Michel Normand From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 23 12:09:14 2016 Received: (at 20017-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jun 2016 16:09:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52862 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bG7Bp-0005zx-DZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 12:09:13 -0400 Received: from pb-sasl1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.66]:62488 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bG7Bn-0005zp-Jf for 20017-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 12:09:11 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AAF1242B4; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 12:09:09 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=oGVrA8aKf3VBSWq2Kh5EZJwqeos=; b=UFfWG6 VA/xbWQkYCwhHuNx7Opdq25BWnZlcCELoswJwYNceR3VPpCScTKos4RCqDYV9wy1 OZOHn7uE+mGTVGbTkIVi53hX2HLpq+bFeXKkJdBw4R1up38kBFekEY2vdq+a9Cqe m1FxbDaRz18F8ekvaAdeQ2LuLiNbvXdg5dHAg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=Fjxo4yGMDW1eJypWJcdsTHMOAwgCHQOi wK8/TCvDoKdf74dhZ/zccWf6K+tdmPXjoQCdnKMvNFkDSy8z/8EMrnP6SFyGXbcC q5f+ZcaAN1cR82I9NItV+2tfbAxstyTrNPDhxrtqhaEBOI2YMwE08jx+B4f0y+I6 3ma0NIpuyXQ= Received: from pb-sasl1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 428E8242B3; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 12:09:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from clucks (unknown [88.160.190.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 67037242B2; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 12:09:08 -0400 (EDT) From: Andy Wingo To: Normand Subject: Re: bug#20017: guile 2.0.11 make check failure for ppc architecture References: <54F9B264.8070106@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <8737o4p1rq.fsf@pobox.com> <576C0027.10502@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 18:09:01 +0200 In-Reply-To: <576C0027.10502@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (normand@linux.vnet.ibm.com's message of "Thu, 23 Jun 2016 17:28:39 +0200") Message-ID: <874m8jopk2.fsf@pobox.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: D0F060F6-395C-11E6-B679-C1836462E9F6-02397024!pb-sasl1.pobox.com X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 20017-done Cc: 20017-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) On Thu 23 Jun 2016 17:28, Normand writes: >> (expt 2 1/2) >> (expt 2.0 1/2) >> (sqrt 2) > > The bugzilla should probably be closed now, > because since then it seems that problem disapeared. > If I do the manual tests as suggested there is no differences in expressions outputs as reported below. Cool, that was easy :-) Happy hacking, Andy From unknown Sun Jun 22 11:38:24 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 11:24:03 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 23 13:44:23 2017 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Apr 2017 17:44:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36706 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d2LYc-0007Yu-VW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Apr 2017 13:44:23 -0400 Received: from defaultvalue.org ([70.85.129.156]:37214 ident=postfix) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d2LYb-0007Yl-MP for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Apr 2017 13:44:22 -0400 Received: from trouble.defaultvalue.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: rlb@defaultvalue.org) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 487B520210 for ; Sun, 23 Apr 2017 12:44:21 -0500 (CDT) Received: by trouble.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EDE0C14E05C; Sun, 23 Apr 2017 12:44:20 -0500 (CDT) From: Rob Browning To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: unarchive 20017 Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2017 12:44:20 -0500 Message-ID: <8737czt3wr.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) unarchive 20017 thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 23 13:48:28 2017 Received: (at 20017) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Apr 2017 17:48:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36721 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d2LcZ-0007fr-PW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Apr 2017 13:48:27 -0400 Received: from defaultvalue.org ([70.85.129.156]:37226 ident=postfix) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d2LcY-0007fj-J6 for 20017@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Apr 2017 13:48:26 -0400 Received: from trouble.defaultvalue.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: rlb@defaultvalue.org) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5C813201AA; Sun, 23 Apr 2017 12:48:24 -0500 (CDT) Received: by trouble.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D236614E05C; Sun, 23 Apr 2017 12:48:23 -0500 (CDT) From: Rob Browning To: Normand , 20017@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#20017: guile 2.0.11 make check failure for ppc architecture Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2017 12:48:23 -0500 Message-ID: <87y3urrp5k.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 20017 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Normand writes: > guile 2.0.11 make check failure for ppc architecture on opensuse 13.2 > > details of the log is available at: > https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory:PowerPC/guile > https://build.opensuse.org/build/openSUSE:Factory:PowerPC/standard/ppc/guile/_log > > There are two failing tests: > === > [ 1223s] FAIL: fractions.test: fractions: (eqv? (expt 2 1/2) (sqrt 2)) > [ 1223s] FAIL: fractions.test: fractions: (eqv? (expt 2.0 1/2) (sqrt 2)) > === > > I have a guest on which I am able to recreate the problem, > but I do not know anything about guile to do investigation of the problem. We're seeing the same thing on a Debian powerpc buildd https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=guile-2.0&arch=powerpc&ver=2.0.11%2B1-9%2Bdeb8u1&stamp=1485708200&raw=0 FAIL: fractions.test: fractions: (eqv? (expt 2 1/2) (sqrt 2)) FAIL: fractions.test: fractions: (eqv? (expt 2.0 1/2) (sqrt 2)) and so I wondered if anything new had been discovered since this was closed. Note that this 2.0.11 (2.0.11+1-9+deb8u1), which we're attempting to build to fix two CVEs in jessie. I can also attempt to manually reproduce the failure on a Debian porterbox. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 25 23:06:38 2017 Received: (at 20017) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Apr 2017 03:06:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40350 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d3DHq-00080C-CV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 23:06:38 -0400 Received: from defaultvalue.org ([70.85.129.156]:39578 ident=postfix) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d3DHp-000805-8q for 20017@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 23:06:37 -0400 Received: from trouble.defaultvalue.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: rlb@defaultvalue.org) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 47A7F20061; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 22:06:36 -0500 (CDT) Received: by trouble.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E98B214E05C; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 22:06:35 -0500 (CDT) From: Rob Browning To: Normand , 20017@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#20017: guile 2.0.11 make check failure for ppc architecture In-Reply-To: <87y3urrp5k.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> References: <54F9B264.8070106@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <87y3urrp5k.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 22:06:35 -0500 Message-ID: <87zif3yiis.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 20017 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Rob Browning writes: > We're seeing the same thing on a Debian powerpc buildd > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=guile-2.0&arch=powerpc&ver=2.0.11%2B1-9%2Bdeb8u1&stamp=1485708200&raw=0 > > FAIL: fractions.test: fractions: (eqv? (expt 2 1/2) (sqrt 2)) > FAIL: fractions.test: fractions: (eqv? (expt 2.0 1/2) (sqrt 2)) OK, I can reproduce this on partch.debian.org now (https://db.debian.org/machines.cgi?host=partch): (jessie_powerpc-dchroot)rlb@partch:~/guile-2.0-2.0.11+1$ ./check-guile fractions.test Testing /home/rlb/guile-2.0-2.0.11+1/meta/guile ... fractions.test with GUILE_LOAD_PATH=/home/rlb/guile-2.0-2.0.11+1/test-suite Running fractions.test FAIL: fractions.test: fractions: (eqv? (expt 2 1/2) (sqrt 2)) FAIL: fractions.test: fractions: (eqv? (expt 2.0 1/2) (sqrt 2)) and poking around I see: (jessie_powerpc-dchroot)rlb@partch:~/guile-2.0-2.0.11+1$ meta/guile GNU Guile 2.0.11 Copyright (C) 1995-2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc. Guile comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `,show w'. This program is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions; type `,show c' for details. Enter `,help' for help. scheme@(guile-user)> (expt 2 1/2) $1 = 1.4142135623730951 scheme@(guile-user)> (expt 2.0 1/2) $2 = 1.4142135623730951 scheme@(guile-user)> (sqrt 2) $3 = 1.414213562373095 Please let me know if I can help. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 25 23:47:17 2017 Received: (at 20017) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Apr 2017 03:47:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40388 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d3DvB-0000YV-1g for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 23:47:17 -0400 Received: from defaultvalue.org ([70.85.129.156]:39602 ident=postfix) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d3Dv9-0000YN-Sh for 20017@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 23:47:16 -0400 Received: from trouble.defaultvalue.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: rlb@defaultvalue.org) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 24C7A201D8; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 22:47:15 -0500 (CDT) Received: by trouble.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7CE3D14E05C; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 22:47:14 -0500 (CDT) From: Rob Browning To: Normand , 20017@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#20017: guile 2.0.11 make check failure for ppc architecture In-Reply-To: <87zif3yiis.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> References: <54F9B264.8070106@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <87y3urrp5k.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <87zif3yiis.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 22:47:14 -0500 Message-ID: <87wpa7ygn1.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 20017 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Rob Browning writes: > OK, I can reproduce this on partch.debian.org now > (https://db.debian.org/machines.cgi?host=partch): > > (jessie_powerpc-dchroot)rlb@partch:~/guile-2.0-2.0.11+1$ ./check-guile fractions.test > Testing /home/rlb/guile-2.0-2.0.11+1/meta/guile ... fractions.test > with GUILE_LOAD_PATH=/home/rlb/guile-2.0-2.0.11+1/test-suite > Running fractions.test > FAIL: fractions.test: fractions: (eqv? (expt 2 1/2) (sqrt 2)) > FAIL: fractions.test: fractions: (eqv? (expt 2.0 1/2) (sqrt 2)) ...looks like a build directly from the 2.0.14 xz archive (not the Debian tree) fails in the same way. -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Apr 26 00:29:31 2017 Received: (at 20017) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Apr 2017 04:29:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40431 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d3Ea2-0001bw-RZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 00:29:31 -0400 Received: from defaultvalue.org ([70.85.129.156]:39644 ident=postfix) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d3Ea0-0001bn-RK for 20017@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 00:29:29 -0400 Received: from trouble.defaultvalue.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: rlb@defaultvalue.org) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B254C20061; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 23:29:25 -0500 (CDT) Received: by trouble.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5A3E414E05C; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 23:29:25 -0500 (CDT) From: Rob Browning To: Normand , 20017@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#20017: guile 2.0.11 make check failure for ppc architecture In-Reply-To: <87wpa7ygn1.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> References: <54F9B264.8070106@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <87y3urrp5k.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <87zif3yiis.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <87wpa7ygn1.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 23:29:25 -0500 Message-ID: <87pofzyeoq.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 20017 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Rob Browning writes: > Rob Browning writes: > >> OK, I can reproduce this on partch.debian.org now >> (https://db.debian.org/machines.cgi?host=partch): >> >> (jessie_powerpc-dchroot)rlb@partch:~/guile-2.0-2.0.11+1$ ./check-guile fractions.test >> Testing /home/rlb/guile-2.0-2.0.11+1/meta/guile ... fractions.test >> with GUILE_LOAD_PATH=/home/rlb/guile-2.0-2.0.11+1/test-suite >> Running fractions.test >> FAIL: fractions.test: fractions: (eqv? (expt 2 1/2) (sqrt 2)) >> FAIL: fractions.test: fractions: (eqv? (expt 2.0 1/2) (sqrt 2)) > > ...looks like a build directly from the 2.0.14 xz archive (not the > Debian tree) fails in the same way. OK, I may have tracked it down to a glibc issue that's been addressed in newer versions: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=841724#80 Assuming that's right, then this bug can probably be (re)closed. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 From unknown Sun Jun 22 11:38:24 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator