GNU bug report logs -
#19992
Small mistake in comment in source code of ls
Previous Next
Full log
Message #10 received at 19992-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On 03/03/15 21:40, Jarosław Gruca wrote:
> In the source code of "ls" (file "src/ls.c"):
>
> { 0, NULL }, /* ec: End color (replaces lc+no+rc) */
>
> there is a small mistake in the comment.
>
> In the place of 'lc+no+rc' should be 'lc+rs+rc' ('rs' instead of 'no').
> Each file is written as 'lc+colorcode+rc+filename+ec', but if
> the 'ec' code is undefined, the sequence 'lc+rs+rc' (with 'rs'),
> and not 'lc+no+rc' (with 'no'), is used:
>
> static void
> prep_non_filename_text (void)
> {
> if (color_indicator[C_END].string != NULL)
> put_indicator (&color_indicator[C_END]);
> else
> {
> put_indicator (&color_indicator[C_LEFT]);
> put_indicator (&color_indicator[C_RESET]); <--- here
> put_indicator (&color_indicator[C_RIGHT]);
> }
> }
>
> To ensure, I did several test by changing 'no' and 'rs'
> with different values and observing printed escape sequences:
>
> LS_COLORS='no=x:rs=y:...' # x,y = different SGR codes
> ls -l --color=always > foo
Pushed at http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=coreutils.git;a=commitdiff;h=69410690
thanks!
Pádraig.
This bug report was last modified 10 years and 138 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.