GNU bug report logs - #19979
vlc install failed with backtrace

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Axel <grafov <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2015 23:28:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #8 received at 19979 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Axel <grafov <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 19979 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#19979: vlc install failed with backtrace
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 14:00:59 +0100
Hi,

Axel <grafov <at> gmail.com> skribis:

> and guix crashed with trace:
>
> Backtrace:
> In guix/scripts/package.scm:
>  814: 19 [process-actions (# # # # ...)]
> In guix/monads.scm:
>  427: 18 [run-with-store # ...]
> In guix/profiles.scm:
>  412: 17 [#<procedure 2c9bb10 at guix/profiles.scm:412:2 (store)> #]
> In guix/gexp.scm:
>  175: 16 [#<procedure 2c9b930 at guix/gexp.scm:175:2 (store)> #]
> In guix/monads.scm:
>  328: 15 [#<procedure 2c9b960 at guix/monads.scm:327:2 (store)> #]
>  328: 14 [#<procedure 2c9b990 at guix/monads.scm:327:2 (store)> #]
> In guix/gexp.scm:
>  100: 13 [#<procedure 2c9ba20 at guix/gexp.scm:100:21 (store)> #]
> In guix/packages.scm:
>  612: 12 [cache # # #<procedure thunk ()>]
>  861: 11 [thunk]
>  793: 10 [bag->derivation # # #]
> In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
>  576: 9 [map #<procedure 2c9b750 at guix/packages.scm:795:30
> (t-12567)> (# # # ...)]
> In guix/packages.scm:
>  654: 8 [expand-input # # # ...]
>  612: 7 [cache # # #<procedure thunk ()>]
>  861: 6 [thunk]
>  793: 5 [bag->derivation # # #]
> In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
>  578: 4 [map #<procedure 2964c00 at guix/packages.scm:795:30
> (t-12567)> (# # # ...)]
> In guix/packages.scm:
>  669: 3 [expand-input # # # ...]
>  373: 2 [patch-and-repack # # # ...]
> In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
>  601: 1 [map #<procedure 29c9960 at guix/packages.scm:373:9 (number
> patch)> (0) ...]
> In guix/packages.scm:
>  375: 0 [#<procedure 29c9960 at guix/packages.scm:373:9 (number patch)> 0 #f]
>
> I just installed guixsd 0.8 and updated it with `guix pull`. Other
> packages installed without problems.

I cannot reproduce it now just after running ‘guix pull’.

However, the line numbers above do not seem to correspond to current
Guix.  Could it be that ‘guix pull’ was run under one account, and ‘guix
package’ under a different account?

Thanks,
Ludo’.




This bug report was last modified 10 years and 83 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.