GNU bug report logs - #19916
24.4; rmail-summary-next-msg declares argument incorrectly

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: schule <at> fsavigny.de (Florian v. Savigny)

Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 20:41:02 UTC

Severity: minor

Found in version 24.4

Fixed in version 25.1

Done: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: schule <at> fsavigny.de (Florian v. Savigny)
To: 19916 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#19916: 24.4; rmail-summary-next-msg declares argument incorrectly
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 19:17:56 +0100

As I am fairly certain that this is a bug in the source code, I am not including any of the automatic information on my system which M-x report-emacs-bug produces.

Description of the bug:  rmail-summary-next-msg declares its attribute
	       	   	 NUMBER as &optional, but does not treat it
	       	   	 like that, at least when called
	       	   	 non-interactively.

Reproducible: always

How: Calling (rmail-summary-next-msg) non-interactively.

Undesired behaviour:

	  Throws the following exception:

	  	 and: Wrong type argument: number-or-marker-p, nil

	  This is an obscure error if you have called
	  (rmail-summary-next-message) in accordance with the
	  documentation.

Explanation:	This can easily be tracked to the following line in the source
		code for the function, where it expects NUMBER to be non-nil:

		(and (> number 0) (end-of-line)) ;; line 3 after the docstring

Line 827 in the source file in the following version of rmailsum.el:
;; Copyright (C) 1985, 1993-1996, 2000-2014 Free Software Foundation,


Workaround: Calling (rmail-summary-next-msg 1) instead of using no argument.




Best regards,

Florian v. Savigny




This bug report was last modified 10 years and 147 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.