GNU bug report logs - #19889
tex-verbatim face: don't specify :family?

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>

Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 20:40:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 24.4

Done: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #86 received at 19889 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: 19889 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, rgm <at> gnu.org, eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu
Subject: Re: bug#19889: bug#22207: emacs-25 mishandles info code text on
 Fedora 23
Date: Sat, 07 May 2016 09:50:50 +0300
> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>,  rgm <at> gnu.org,  19889 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 06 May 2016 15:32:43 -0400
> 
> > The problem is, which font to specify explicitly? Not all platforms
> > have a font named "Courier".
> 
> That's what face-font-family-alternatives is for.  We already have an
> entry in there for "courier", so it just needs to be completed.

But if what we want is a specific font, then adding its family will
produce unreliable results, and might well yield a font we don't want
in some setups.

IOW, what you suggest was already tried, and found to fail in some
cases.  We are trying to fix those cases, so using the same technique
we already know is faulty sounds unwise to me.




This bug report was last modified 9 years and 11 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.