GNU bug report logs -
#19867
c++-mode indentation issues with C++1x initializer lists
Previous Next
Reported by: turner25 <at> gmail.com
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 18:17:01 UTC
Severity: minor
Found in version 24.4.1
Done: Alan Mackenzie <acm <at> muc.de>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #28 received at 19867 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Simon <turner25 <at> gmail.com> writes:
> Initializer lists use curly braces, but their contents do not indent properly with emacs' c++-mode.
> In short, one may use an initializer list to declare and initialize a vector of integers as such:
> std::vector<int> Foo( { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 } );
>
> Problems arise when the elements of the list span on multiple line and it gets even worse when the elements are lambda-expressions
> and nested initializer lists.
> The following code illustrate most cases and related situations. The code below compiles without error or warning with gcc 4.8.3.
I had a look at the fairly long example provided here, and AFAICT, the
indentation is incorrect in the below cases (trimmed down from the
original). Some of the examples of incorrect indentation were already
fixed.
Alan, could you perhaps take a look at this and see if this is something
that is fixable? Thanks in advance.
#include <vector>
#include <functional>
namespace emacs_initlist_indentation_bug {
struct DEF {
int d, //
e, // indented from "int" + 2
f; //
};
struct GHI {
int //
g, // indented from "int" +0
h, // indented from "int" + 2
i; //
};
void f4 (int a, int b, int c)
{
std::vector<ABC> abcList2( // Source of
alignment for closing ")" below
{{a+6,
b+6,
c+6}
} //
); /* Somehow, this
one aligns with first line's comment position!! */
}
lambda_initlist_bug.push_back( //
[](int p) // OK, text-book indentation
{ //
return p+p; //
} //
); /* Aligned with
first comment! */
}
}
This bug report was last modified 2 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.