GNU bug report logs - #19832
Deleting unused links is too slow

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>

Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:26:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#19832: closed (Deleting unused links is too slow)
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 17:27:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Thu, 12 Feb 2015 18:26:54 +0100
with message-id <87lhk3oxb5.fsf <at> gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#19832: Deleting unused links is too slow
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #19832,
regarding Deleting unused links is too slow
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
19832: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=19832
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: Deleting unused links is too slow
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 20:25:21 +0100
Hello,

I just compiled a test package and tried a
"guix gc -d /path/to/package/in/store"

After printing
 deleting `/gnu/store/642pwarg5hppzh1gwadd07w0g4w3rwpx-nss-certs-3.17.3'
 deleting `/gnu/store/trash'
 deleting unused links...
which is instantaneous, I need to wait for 5 minutes with the disk spinning.

I suppose this is a side-effect of deduplication?

Andreas



[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
Cc: 19832-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#19832: Deleting unused links is too slow
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 18:26:54 +0100
Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr> skribis:

> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 11:24:51PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> If you haven’t GC’d in a long time, it’s also likely to take longer.
>
> Maybe that was the problem. I tried again later to gc one package, and it was
> almost instantaneous. Which means that there might not be a problem after all.

OK, closing it then.

Thanks,
Ludo’.


This bug report was last modified 10 years and 105 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.