From unknown Sat Aug 16 18:43:32 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#19799: Tangentally related to eww-mode Invalid Date bug just filed Resent-From: Matthew Carter Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 08:31:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 19799 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 19799@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.14232978366326 (code B ref -1); Sat, 07 Feb 2015 08:31:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Feb 2015 08:30:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36072 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YK0mg-0001dx-Sy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 03:30:35 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35762) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YJxkg-0005MN-4W for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 00:16:18 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJxkX-0008QI-Pl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 00:16:12 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:60577) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJxkX-0008QE-Nx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 00:16:09 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37447) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJxkR-0000w6-KI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 00:16:09 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJxkL-0008Mw-Fp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 00:16:03 -0500 Received: from li130-200.members.linode.com ([69.164.215.200]:46315 helo=mail.ahungry.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJxkL-0008Mn-Da for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 00:15:57 -0500 Received: from Prometheus (99-40-9-245.lightspeed.livnmi.sbcglobal.net [99.40.9.245]) by mail.ahungry.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8844C481C for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 00:15:56 -0500 (EST) From: Matthew Carter Organization: Ahungry (http://ahungry.com) Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 00:15:55 -0500 Message-ID: <871tm2cnec.fsf@ahungry.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 03:30:31 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Excuse the new thread (just signed up to bug-gnu-emacs list, whereas I filed the original bug via the report function). I've pinpointed the eww-mode bug to an issue with #'date-to-time in time-date.el. It appears to be a manifestation of the Year 2038 problem and caused by the fact that the cookie being sent has an expiration date beyond year 2038. As it turns out, I am unable to reproduce the issue on a 64-bit machine (it only happens on my 32-bit ones). Would it be better to rework #'date-to-time to handle future dates in a more graceful manner on 32-bit machines, or to have eww-mode ignore triggers that cause it to parse dates it cannot handle? -- Matthew Carter (m@ahungry.com) http://ahungry.com From unknown Sat Aug 16 18:43:32 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#19799: Tangentally related to eww-mode Invalid Date bug just filed References: <871tm2cnec.fsf@ahungry.com> In-Reply-To: <871tm2cnec.fsf@ahungry.com> Resent-From: Paul Eggert Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 19:30:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19799 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Matthew Carter Cc: 19799@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 19799-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19799.142342374230956 (code B ref 19799); Sun, 08 Feb 2015 19:30:03 +0000 Received: (at 19799) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2015 19:29:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37595 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YKXXR-000830-OY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Feb 2015 14:29:02 -0500 Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.62]:39853) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YKXXO-00082i-O0 for 19799@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Feb 2015 14:28:59 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1DD939E8020; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 11:28:52 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smtp.cs.ucla.edu Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y3NIAbiLJ+ov; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 11:28:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.9] (pool-173-55-11-52.lsanca.fios.verizon.net [173.55.11.52]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5842639E801E; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 11:28:52 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54D7B8F4.6090505@cs.ucla.edu> Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 11:28:52 -0800 From: Paul Eggert Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) > Would it be better to rework #'date-to-time to handle future dates in a > more graceful manner on 32-bit machines, or to have eww-mode ignore > triggers that cause it to parse dates it cannot handle? There is a variant of date-to-time that refuses to throw an error on out-of-range dates, namely safe-date-to-time. But I'm still puzzled as to why you're getting this error. date-to-time is supposed to throw a "Specified time is not representable" for out-of-range dates, but for you it's throwing some other error. Can you debug why that is happening? What happens when you run the following in your *scratch* buffer? (date-to-time "Mon, 06 Mar 2130 20:55:03 GMT") On my platform (Fedora 21 x86) if I type C-j after that, the debugger is entered with this backtrace: Debugger entered--Lisp error: (error . "Specified time is not representable") signal(error "Specified time is not representable") apply(signal (error "Specified time is not representable")) (if (equal err overflow-error) (apply (quote signal) err) (condition-case err$ (let ((overflow-error (quote (error "Specified time is not representable"))))$ (condition-case err (apply (quote encode-time) (parse-time-string date)) (err$ date-to-time("Mon, 06 Mar 2130 20:55:03 GMT") ... What happens on your platform? Also, what is your platform? What does (emacs-version) return, for starters? From unknown Sat Aug 16 18:43:32 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#19799: Tangentally related to eww-mode Invalid Date bug just filed Resent-From: Matthew Carter Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 20:26:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19799 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Paul Eggert Cc: 19799@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 19799-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19799.14234271403717 (code B ref 19799); Sun, 08 Feb 2015 20:26:02 +0000 Received: (at 19799) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2015 20:25:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37630 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YKYQE-0000xs-LS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Feb 2015 15:25:39 -0500 Received: from li130-200.members.linode.com ([69.164.215.200]:43272 helo=mail.ahungry.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YKYQB-0000xb-Jk for 19799@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Feb 2015 15:25:36 -0500 Received: from Prometheus (99-40-9-245.lightspeed.livnmi.sbcglobal.net [99.40.9.245]) by mail.ahungry.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B571E407D; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 15:25:29 -0500 (EST) From: Matthew Carter Organization: Ahungry (http://ahungry.com) References: <54D7B8F4.6090505@cs.ucla.edu> Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 15:25:23 -0500 In-Reply-To: <54D7B8F4.6090505@cs.ucla.edu> (Paul Eggert's message of "Sun, 08 Feb 2015 11:28:52 -0800") Message-ID: <87lhk8b170.fsf@ahungry.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Paul Eggert writes: >> Would it be better to rework #'date-to-time to handle future dates in a >> more graceful manner on 32-bit machines, or to have eww-mode ignore >> triggers that cause it to parse dates it cannot handle? > > There is a variant of date-to-time that refuses to throw an error on > out-of-range dates, namely safe-date-to-time. But I'm still puzzled > as to why you're getting this error. date-to-time is supposed to > throw a "Specified time is not representable" for out-of-range dates, > but for you it's throwing some other error. Can you debug why that is > happening? > > What happens when you run the following in your *scratch* buffer? > > (date-to-time "Mon, 06 Mar 2130 20:55:03 GMT") > > On my platform (Fedora 21 x86) if I type C-j after that, the debugger > is entered with this backtrace: > > Debugger entered--Lisp error: (error . "Specified time is not representable") > signal(error "Specified time is not representable") > apply(signal (error "Specified time is not representable")) > (if (equal err overflow-error) (apply (quote signal) err) (condition-case err$ > (let ((overflow-error (quote (error "Specified time is not representable"))))$ > (condition-case err (apply (quote encode-time) (parse-time-string date)) (err$ > date-to-time("Mon, 06 Mar 2130 20:55:03 GMT") > ... > > What happens on your platform? > > Also, what is your platform? What does (emacs-version) return, for starters? > This is on an i686 machine - the eval returns: Debugger entered--Lisp error: (error "Invalid date: Mon, 06 Mar 2130 20:55:03 GMT") signal(error ("Invalid date: Mon, 06 Mar 2130 20:55:03 GMT")) error("Invalid date: %s" "Mon, 06 Mar 2130 20:55:03 GMT") byte-code("\300\301\302\217\207" [nil (byte-code "\301\302\303\304^H!!\"\207" [date apply encode-time parse-time-string time$ date-to-time("Mon, 06 Mar 2130 20:55:03 GMT") eval((date-to-time "Mon, 06 Mar 2130 20:55:03 GMT") nil) eval-last-sexp-1(t) eval-last-sexp(t) eval-print-last-sexp(nil) call-interactively(eval-print-last-sexp nil nil) command-execute(eval-print-last-sexp) The version is: GNU Emacs 24.4.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.14.7) of 2015-01-17 on bisson Anything up to 2038 will work without issue. I had read OpenBSD fixed the 2038 date issue using 'long long int' instead of 'time_t' for dates in the codebase on 32 bit machines. I think eww-mode should not fail to load subsequent pages though, even if a cookie date is bad (bad cookies should not halt further page requests), so maybe eww-mode just needs to catch the thrown error? -- Matthew Carter (m@ahungry.com) http://ahungry.com From unknown Sat Aug 16 18:43:32 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.503 (Entity 5.503) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Matthew Carter Subject: bug#19799: closed (Re: Tangentally related to eww-mode Invalid Date bug just filed) Message-ID: References: <54D82081.1010101@cs.ucla.edu> <871tm2cnec.fsf@ahungry.com> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 19799 X-Gnu-PR-Package: emacs Reply-To: 19799@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 02:51:02 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1423450262-7067-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1423450262-7067-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #19799: Tangentally related to eww-mode Invalid Date bug just filed which was filed against the emacs package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 19799@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 19799: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D19799 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1423450262-7067-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 19799-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2015 02:50:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37688 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YKeQz-0001p8-EN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Feb 2015 21:50:49 -0500 Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.62]:53710) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YKeQx-0001os-T2 for 19799-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Feb 2015 21:50:48 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EE15A60022; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 18:50:42 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smtp.cs.ucla.edu Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4stsf-pAg+50; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 18:50:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.9] (pool-173-55-11-52.lsanca.fios.verizon.net [173.55.11.52]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 89E6BA6000B; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 18:50:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54D82081.1010101@cs.ucla.edu> Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 18:50:41 -0800 From: Paul Eggert Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Carter Subject: Re: Tangentally related to eww-mode Invalid Date bug just filed References: <54D7B8F4.6090505@cs.ucla.edu> <87lhk8b170.fsf@ahungry.com> In-Reply-To: <87lhk8b170.fsf@ahungry.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 19799-done Cc: 19799-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) OK, I've fixed the "Invalid date:" bug in master commit fd6f7d1449c8496ab5c019d2aad7ca5e2980713a dated today. This fixes the problem with date-to-time on 32-bit hosts, since it now throws the correct exception rather than the incorrect one, so I'm closing this bug report. I'm leaving Bug#19798 open for now, until you can verify that the original eww issue is indeed fixed on the master. ------------=_1423450262-7067-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Feb 2015 08:30:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36072 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YK0mg-0001dx-Sy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 03:30:35 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35762) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YJxkg-0005MN-4W for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 00:16:18 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJxkX-0008QI-Pl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 00:16:12 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:60577) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJxkX-0008QE-Nx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 00:16:09 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37447) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJxkR-0000w6-KI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 00:16:09 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJxkL-0008Mw-Fp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 00:16:03 -0500 Received: from li130-200.members.linode.com ([69.164.215.200]:46315 helo=mail.ahungry.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJxkL-0008Mn-Da for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 00:15:57 -0500 Received: from Prometheus (99-40-9-245.lightspeed.livnmi.sbcglobal.net [99.40.9.245]) by mail.ahungry.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8844C481C for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 00:15:56 -0500 (EST) From: Matthew Carter To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: Tangentally related to eww-mode Invalid Date bug just filed Organization: Ahungry (http://ahungry.com) Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 00:15:55 -0500 Message-ID: <871tm2cnec.fsf@ahungry.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 03:30:31 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Excuse the new thread (just signed up to bug-gnu-emacs list, whereas I filed the original bug via the report function). I've pinpointed the eww-mode bug to an issue with #'date-to-time in time-date.el. It appears to be a manifestation of the Year 2038 problem and caused by the fact that the cookie being sent has an expiration date beyond year 2038. As it turns out, I am unable to reproduce the issue on a 64-bit machine (it only happens on my 32-bit ones). Would it be better to rework #'date-to-time to handle future dates in a more graceful manner on 32-bit machines, or to have eww-mode ignore triggers that cause it to parse dates it cannot handle? -- Matthew Carter (m@ahungry.com) http://ahungry.com ------------=_1423450262-7067-1-- From unknown Sat Aug 16 18:43:32 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#19799: Tangentally related to eww-mode Invalid Date bug just filed Resent-From: Matthew Carter Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 03:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19799 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 19799@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu Received: via spool by 19799-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19799.14234516749335 (code B ref 19799); Mon, 09 Feb 2015 03:15:02 +0000 Received: (at 19799) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2015 03:14:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37701 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YKeny-0002QU-6B for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Feb 2015 22:14:34 -0500 Received: from li130-200.members.linode.com ([69.164.215.200]:46760 helo=mail.ahungry.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YKenw-0002QH-8H for 19799@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Feb 2015 22:14:32 -0500 Received: from Prometheus (99-40-9-245.lightspeed.livnmi.sbcglobal.net [99.40.9.245]) by mail.ahungry.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A192F407D; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 22:14:26 -0500 (EST) From: Matthew Carter Organization: Ahungry (http://ahungry.com) References: <54D7B8F4.6090505@cs.ucla.edu> <87lhk8b170.fsf@ahungry.com> <54D82081.1010101@cs.ucla.edu> Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 22:14:25 -0500 In-Reply-To: <54D82081.1010101@cs.ucla.edu> (Paul Eggert's message of "Sun, 08 Feb 2015 18:50:41 -0800") Message-ID: <87siefai9a.fsf@ahungry.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Paul Eggert writes: > OK, I've fixed the "Invalid date:" bug in master commit > fd6f7d1449c8496ab5c019d2aad7ca5e2980713a dated today. This fixes the > problem with date-to-time on 32-bit hosts, since it now throws the > correct exception rather than the incorrect one, so I'm closing this > bug report. I'm leaving Bug#19798 open for now, until you can verify > that the original eww issue is indeed fixed on the master. > > > The issue is fixed, no more failure to load subsequent pages when an overflowed cookie date is encountered. Thanks! -- Matthew Carter (m@ahungry.com) http://ahungry.com From unknown Sat Aug 16 18:43:32 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#19799: Tangentally related to eww-mode Invalid Date bug just filed Resent-From: Paul Eggert Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 06:30:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19799 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Matthew Carter Cc: 19799@debbugs.gnu.org, 19798-done@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 19799-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19799.142346339015281 (code B ref 19799); Mon, 09 Feb 2015 06:30:02 +0000 Received: (at 19799) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2015 06:29:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37820 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YKhqv-0003yJ-A9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 01:29:49 -0500 Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.62]:60904) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YKhqq-0003xv-6o; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 01:29:45 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16612A60028; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 22:29:38 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smtp.cs.ucla.edu Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dZxgEc1uCMyV; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 22:29:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.9] (pool-173-55-11-52.lsanca.fios.verizon.net [173.55.11.52]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C91FF39E801F; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 22:29:37 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54D853D1.9020002@cs.ucla.edu> Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 22:29:37 -0800 From: Paul Eggert Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <54D7B8F4.6090505@cs.ucla.edu> <87lhk8b170.fsf@ahungry.com> <54D82081.1010101@cs.ucla.edu> <87siefai9a.fsf@ahungry.com> In-Reply-To: <87siefai9a.fsf@ahungry.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) Matthew Carter wrote: > The issue is fixed, no more failure to load subsequent pages when an > overflowed cookie date is encountered. Thanks for checking, and so I'm closing Bug#19798 too.