From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 06 11:44:23 2015 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Feb 2015 16:44:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35806 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YJm10-00041Z-Ot for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 11:44:23 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50484) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YJeiT-0007jL-Qq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 03:56:46 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJeiN-0003hx-N0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 03:56:40 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:37765) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJeiN-0003ho-KV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 03:56:39 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52202) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJeiM-000284-PJ for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 03:56:39 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJeiJ-0003g4-49 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 03:56:38 -0500 Received: from app.discard.email ([37.120.161.148]:56092) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJeiI-0003fH-Uj for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 03:56:35 -0500 Received: by app.discard.email (Postfix, from userid 33) id 594E4DE5AD; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 09:56:33 +0100 (CET) To: bug-guile@gnu.org Subject: please document level of R7RS[-small] support in Guile manual X-PHP-Originating-Script: 0:PHPMailer.class.php Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 09:56:33 +0100 From: "andrew@cachedot.net" Message-ID: <4b44843fb5040cbf580b77556431893d@discard.email> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: PHPMailer 5.2.9 (https://github.com/PHPMailer/PHPMailer/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="b1_4b44843fb5040cbf580b77556431893d" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 11:44:21 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: andrew@cachedot.net List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) --b1_4b44843fb5040cbf580b77556431893d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable It would be nice if the Guile manual described to what extent Guile support= s R7RS[-small], and what R7RS features are still missing. Something along the lines of https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel= /2012-02/msg00065.html but up to date. thanks --b1_4b44843fb5040cbf580b77556431893d Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

It would be nice if the Guile manual described to what extent Guile supp= orts R7RS[-small],

and what R7RS features are still missing.

Something along the lines of https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gu= ile-devel/2012-02/msg00065.html

but up to date.

thanks

--b1_4b44843fb5040cbf580b77556431893d-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 23 05:14:49 2016 Received: (at 19793) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jun 2016 09:14:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51789 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bG0im-0000eg-VM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 05:14:49 -0400 Received: from pb-sasl1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.66]:57435 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bG0il-0000eZ-0D for 19793@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 05:14:47 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B24A20804; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 05:14:45 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=DmzwmgiHSOnXJYs3WXv+4HUDayU=; b=L2A2gw 1wJq2HOC5VGdrWXF9XE8TWk0ACm8bXc18JPtij1KZG+4M3StYDUHY9WVzHwPFBcd 8x5gJQOeq3JOrHK6Cp79ynaQXCIwhrBDeAcNDq7pcbeJbUe32jGzXStnYT/QFYkJ NDZ3EDIqEdTtGMaHNjAHu86jZjc+DSUswp6bs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=p+R1aYCWohjaw5VDq3/8n/g1Ch2au1Et hvA1SV3p+REGInEBXq15N7RFU7FUPt7Ffw/hySshSk+cS7cPm9xZO3vuX4f7nukO UHMfBU6eKA0DXzmcRZdM0LYYAiiZulkQAKOWe1gn9COoGu2ISE3igiMNW8+zOr3F aLVyjCF3ufM= Received: from pb-sasl1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 949E320803; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 05:14:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from clucks (unknown [88.160.190.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E210520802; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 05:14:44 -0400 (EDT) From: Andy Wingo To: "andrew\@cachedot.net" Subject: Re: bug#19793: please document level of R7RS[-small] support in Guile manual References: <4b44843fb5040cbf580b77556431893d@discard.email> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 11:14:38 +0200 In-Reply-To: <4b44843fb5040cbf580b77556431893d@discard.email> (andrew@cachedot.net's message of "Fri, 6 Feb 2015 09:56:33 +0100") Message-ID: <87k2hgp8qp.fsf@pobox.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: ED12EB44-3922-11E6-8E97-C1836462E9F6-02397024!pb-sasl1.pobox.com X-Spam-Score: 1.1 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Andrew, Would you be willing to create such a document? Contributions would be happily accepted :) Take a look at doc/ref/r6rs.texi for a template (just the incompatibilities and general overview section I guess). [...] Content analysis details: (1.1 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.5 URIBL_DBL_SPAM Contains a spam URL listed in the DBL blocklist [URIs: cachedot.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -1.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 19793 Cc: 19793@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.1 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Andrew, Would you be willing to create such a document? Contributions would be happily accepted :) Take a look at doc/ref/r6rs.texi for a template (just the incompatibilities and general overview section I guess). [...] Content analysis details: (1.1 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.5 URIBL_DBL_SPAM Contains a spam URL listed in the DBL blocklist [URIs: cachedot.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -1.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid Hi Andrew, Would you be willing to create such a document? Contributions would be happily accepted :) Take a look at doc/ref/r6rs.texi for a template (just the incompatibilities and general overview section I guess). Andy On Fri 06 Feb 2015 09:56, "andrew@cachedot.net" writes: > It would be nice if the Guile manual described to what extent Guile > supports R7RS[-small], > > and what R7RS features are still missing. > > Something along the lines of > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2012-02/msg00065.html > > but up to date. > > thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jun 28 12:21:36 2016 Received: (at 19793-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jun 2016 16:21:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59267 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bHvlY-0001uk-4g for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 12:21:36 -0400 Received: from pb-sasl1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.66]:51686 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bHvlW-0001uZ-B5 for 19793-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 12:21:34 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB85526B8F for <19793-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 12:21:33 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=/5o1EeVhCZnfmGQXNyL92EstSyk=; b=KGiqI6 tvHjHq5+hjVAcMCN21MayDTFiN8IM/ysAqe1EYTaC0/A4jsDod7FqtWJ6qc7plr2 3EIhUlJB4JiIB2ysugClR3/RvaWEoNMAtnOOKSH1vmXFK9c1Y8hm7hkbFUdT1uQZ pijT1yd3cxvrooGEEK/IDSGeNXNybyW2Zd/2Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:subject :references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=LIvrRcAWev5GTQ3gvM6bkweqX8MhnRmF TS1APISd29/11025v9n5u6VMhm00UzoPfM5M5fsOQakEbpPxj/BijNI+IqQ8ytC1 r2Zhkc+5M678CFxha38GErQ/Q54ALs8oYjhv9T+3sOyP8peLOZa4NGHj+4ihfxDs VMbqyOqP+C4= Received: from pb-sasl1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B438E26B8E for <19793-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 12:21:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from clucks (unknown [88.160.190.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 037CC26B8D for <19793-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 12:21:32 -0400 (EDT) From: Andy Wingo To: 19793-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender References: <20160628093142.846D823B5D@pb-sasl1.pobox.com> Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 18:21:24 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20160628093142.846D823B5D@pb-sasl1.pobox.com> (Mail Delivery System's message of "Tue, 28 Jun 2016 05:31:42 -0400 (EDT)") Message-ID: <877fd98et7.fsf@pobox.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 60BFCB16-3D4C-11E6-AD65-C1836462E9F6-02397024!pb-sasl1.pobox.com X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Reporter unavailable, closing bug. On Tue 28 Jun 2016 11:31, MAILER-DAEMON@pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Mail Delivery System) writes: > This is the mail system at host pb-sasl1.pobox.com. > > I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not > be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below. > > For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster. > > If you do so, please include this problem report. You can > delete your own text from the attached returned message. > > The mail system > > : Host or domain name not found. Name service error for > name=cachedot.net type=MX: Host not found, try again > > Reporting-MTA: dns; pb-sasl1.pobox.com > X-Postfix-Queue-ID: 9B24A20804 > X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; wingo@pobox.com > Arrival-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 05:14:45 -0400 (EDT) > > Final-Recipient: rfc822; andrew@cachedot.net > Original-Recipient: rfc822;andrew@cachedot.net > Action: failed > Status: 4.4.3 > Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; Host or domain name not found. Name service error > for name=cachedot.net type=MX: Host not found, try again > > From: Andy Wingo > Subject: Re: bug#19793: please document level of R7RS[-small] support in Guile manual > To: "andrew@cachedot.net" > Cc: 19793@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 11:14:38 +0200 (5 days, 7 hours, 5 minutes ago) > > Hi Andrew, > > Would you be willing to create such a document? Contributions would be > happily accepted :) Take a look at doc/ref/r6rs.texi for a template > (just the incompatibilities and general overview section I guess). > > Andy > > On Fri 06 Feb 2015 09:56, "andrew@cachedot.net" writes: > >> It would be nice if the Guile manual described to what extent Guile >> supports R7RS[-small], >> >> and what R7RS features are still missing. >> >> Something along the lines of >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2012-02/msg00065.html >> >> but up to date. >> >> thanks > [...] Content analysis details: (1.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.3 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.5 URIBL_DBL_SPAM Contains a spam URL listed in the DBL blocklist [URIs: cachedot.net] 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 19793-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Reporter unavailable, closing bug. On Tue 28 Jun 2016 11:31, MAILER-DAEMON@pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Mail Delivery System) writes: > This is the mail system at host pb-sasl1.pobox.com. > > I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not > be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below. > > For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster. > > If you do so, please include this problem report. You can > delete your own text from the attached returned message. > > The mail system > > : Host or domain name not found. Name service error for > name=cachedot.net type=MX: Host not found, try again > > Reporting-MTA: dns; pb-sasl1.pobox.com > X-Postfix-Queue-ID: 9B24A20804 > X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; wingo@pobox.com > Arrival-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 05:14:45 -0400 (EDT) > > Final-Recipient: rfc822; andrew@cachedot.net > Original-Recipient: rfc822;andrew@cachedot.net > Action: failed > Status: 4.4.3 > Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; Host or domain name not found. Name service error > for name=cachedot.net type=MX: Host not found, try again > > From: Andy Wingo > Subject: Re: bug#19793: please document level of R7RS[-small] support in Guile manual > To: "andrew@cachedot.net" > Cc: 19793@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 11:14:38 +0200 (5 days, 7 hours, 5 minutes ago) > > Hi Andrew, > > Would you be willing to create such a document? Contributions would be > happily accepted :) Take a look at doc/ref/r6rs.texi for a template > (just the incompatibilities and general overview section I guess). > > Andy > > On Fri 06 Feb 2015 09:56, "andrew@cachedot.net" writes: > >> It would be nice if the Guile manual described to what extent Guile >> supports R7RS[-small], >> >> and what R7RS features are still missing. >> >> Something along the lines of >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2012-02/msg00065.html >> >> but up to date. >> >> thanks > [...] Content analysis details: (1.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.5 URIBL_DBL_SPAM Contains a spam URL listed in the DBL blocklist [URIs: cachedot.net] -1.3 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid Reporter unavailable, closing bug. On Tue 28 Jun 2016 11:31, MAILER-DAEMON@pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Mail Delivery System) writes: > This is the mail system at host pb-sasl1.pobox.com. > > I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not > be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below. > > For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster. > > If you do so, please include this problem report. You can > delete your own text from the attached returned message. > > The mail system > > : Host or domain name not found. Name service error for > name=cachedot.net type=MX: Host not found, try again > > Reporting-MTA: dns; pb-sasl1.pobox.com > X-Postfix-Queue-ID: 9B24A20804 > X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; wingo@pobox.com > Arrival-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 05:14:45 -0400 (EDT) > > Final-Recipient: rfc822; andrew@cachedot.net > Original-Recipient: rfc822;andrew@cachedot.net > Action: failed > Status: 4.4.3 > Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; Host or domain name not found. Name service error > for name=cachedot.net type=MX: Host not found, try again > > From: Andy Wingo > Subject: Re: bug#19793: please document level of R7RS[-small] support in Guile manual > To: "andrew@cachedot.net" > Cc: 19793@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 11:14:38 +0200 (5 days, 7 hours, 5 minutes ago) > > Hi Andrew, > > Would you be willing to create such a document? Contributions would be > happily accepted :) Take a look at doc/ref/r6rs.texi for a template > (just the incompatibilities and general overview section I guess). > > Andy > > On Fri 06 Feb 2015 09:56, "andrew@cachedot.net" writes: > >> It would be nice if the Guile manual described to what extent Guile >> supports R7RS[-small], >> >> and what R7RS features are still missing. >> >> Something along the lines of >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2012-02/msg00065.html >> >> but up to date. >> >> thanks > ---------- From unknown Thu Jun 19 14:28:03 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator