Subject: Re: bug#19764: Downgrade reported as an ugprade

From: [email-masked] (Ludovic Courtès)
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 19:09:16 +0100

Mark H Weaver <[email-masked]> skribis:

> I don't know about this one, but another problem with our upgrade
> command is that it mishandles outputs other than "out", at least in the
> console output.  It _always_ says it's upgrading them.

>From a quick check, ‘manifest-transaction-effects’ reports the right
thing when upgrading just a single output.

Could you send an example that illustrates the problem?

TIA,
Ludo’.