From unknown Sun Jun 22 08:03:09 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#19764: Downgrade reported as an ugprade Resent-From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 09:17:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 19764 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 19764@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.1423041374770 (code B ref -1); Wed, 04 Feb 2015 09:17:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Feb 2015 09:16:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33424 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YIw4E-0000CM-7N for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 04:16:14 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50268) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YIw4C-0000C6-8f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 04:16:12 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YIw46-0006qo-Dy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 04:16:06 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:42814) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YIw46-0006qf-B5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 04:16:06 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51989) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YIw45-0007w8-ED for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 04:16:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YIw42-0006qA-9o for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 04:16:05 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:41957) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YIw42-0006q6-6k for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 04:16:02 -0500 Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:35430 helo=pluto) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YIw41-0004so-M6 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 04:16:02 -0500 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 16 =?UTF-8?Q?Pluvi=C3=B4se?= an 223 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 10:15:58 +0100 Message-ID: <878ugem3zl.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) As seen during a =E2=80=98guix package=E2=80=99 demo at FOSDEM, downgrades = are reported as upgrades as of 0.8.1. Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Sun Jun 22 08:03:09 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#19764: Downgrade reported as an ugprade Resent-From: Mark H Weaver Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 16:19:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19764 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Cc: 19764@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 19764-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19764.142306668718630 (code B ref 19764); Wed, 04 Feb 2015 16:19:02 +0000 Received: (at 19764) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Feb 2015 16:18:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34076 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YJ2eU-0004qP-KN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 11:18:06 -0500 Received: from world.peace.net ([50.252.239.5]:38497 ident=hope1) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YJ2eT-0004qH-6r for 19764@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 11:18:05 -0500 Received: from [10.1.10.11] (helo=jojen) by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1YJ2eM-0002lU-BM; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 11:17:58 -0500 From: Mark H Weaver References: <878ugem3zl.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 11:18:06 -0500 In-Reply-To: <878ugem3zl.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Wed, 04 Feb 2015 10:15:58 +0100") Message-ID: <87r3u5hcqp.fsf@netris.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > As seen during a =E2=80=98guix package=E2=80=99 demo at FOSDEM, downgrade= s are reported > as upgrades as of 0.8.1. I don't know about this one, but another problem with our upgrade command is that it mishandles outputs other than "out", at least in the console output. It _always_ says it's upgrading them. Mark From unknown Sun Jun 22 08:03:09 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.503 (Entity 5.503) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: bug#19764: closed (Re: bug#19764: Downgrade reported as an ugprade) Message-ID: References: <8761bcqo1t.fsf@gnu.org> <878ugem3zl.fsf@gnu.org> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 19764 X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix Reply-To: 19764@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 18:03:02 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1423418582-17412-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1423418582-17412-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #19764: Downgrade reported as an ugprade which was filed against the guix package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 19764@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 19764: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D19764 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1423418582-17412-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 19764-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2015 18:02:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37517 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YKWBw-0004WL-OC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Feb 2015 13:02:44 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:36040 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YKWBt-0004WB-Q2 for 19764-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Feb 2015 13:02:42 -0500 Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:47821 helo=pluto) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YKWBt-0001ZW-0q for 19764-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Feb 2015 13:02:41 -0500 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: 19764-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#19764: Downgrade reported as an ugprade References: <878ugem3zl.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 19:02:38 +0100 In-Reply-To: <878ugem3zl.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Wed, 04 Feb 2015 10:15:58 +0100") Message-ID: <8761bcqo1t.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 19764-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) skribis: > As seen during a =E2=80=98guix package=E2=80=99 demo at FOSDEM, downgrade= s are reported > as upgrades as of 0.8.1. Fixed in 46b23e1: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ ./pre-inst-env guix package -p foo -i guile-1.8.8 -n gnu/packages/guile.scm:50:2: rimarko: ni uzas guile-1.8.8 sed guile-2.0.11 = disponeblas unuanivele The following package would be downgraded: guile 2.0.11 =E2=86=92 1.8.8 /gnu/store/660m94139bka6mi7bdja5nvvqwq61zkk= -guile-1.8.8 --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Ludo'. ------------=_1423418582-17412-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Feb 2015 09:16:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33424 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YIw4E-0000CM-7N for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 04:16:14 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50268) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YIw4C-0000C6-8f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 04:16:12 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YIw46-0006qo-Dy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 04:16:06 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:42814) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YIw46-0006qf-B5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 04:16:06 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51989) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YIw45-0007w8-ED for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 04:16:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YIw42-0006qA-9o for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 04:16:05 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:41957) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YIw42-0006q6-6k for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 04:16:02 -0500 Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:35430 helo=pluto) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YIw41-0004so-M6 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 04:16:02 -0500 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: Downgrade reported as an ugprade X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 16 =?utf-8?Q?Pluvi=C3=B4se?= an 223 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 10:15:58 +0100 Message-ID: <878ugem3zl.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) As seen during a =E2=80=98guix package=E2=80=99 demo at FOSDEM, downgrades = are reported as upgrades as of 0.8.1. Ludo=E2=80=99. ------------=_1423418582-17412-1-- From unknown Sun Jun 22 08:03:09 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#19764: Downgrade reported as an ugprade Resent-From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 18:10:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19764 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Mark H Weaver Cc: 19764@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 19764-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19764.142341896618027 (code B ref 19764); Sun, 08 Feb 2015 18:10:02 +0000 Received: (at 19764) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2015 18:09:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37523 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YKWIP-0004gd-KM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Feb 2015 13:09:25 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:36092 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YKWIN-0004gW-UB for 19764@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Feb 2015 13:09:24 -0500 Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:47823 helo=pluto) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YKWIN-0004FG-5I; Sun, 08 Feb 2015 13:09:23 -0500 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <878ugem3zl.fsf@gnu.org> <87r3u5hcqp.fsf@netris.org> Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 19:09:16 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87r3u5hcqp.fsf@netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Wed, 04 Feb 2015 11:18:06 -0500") Message-ID: <871tm0qnqr.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Mark H Weaver skribis: > I don't know about this one, but another problem with our upgrade > command is that it mishandles outputs other than "out", at least in the > console output. It _always_ says it's upgrading them. >From a quick check, =E2=80=98manifest-transaction-effects=E2=80=99 reports = the right thing when upgrading just a single output. Could you send an example that illustrates the problem? TIA, Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Sun Jun 22 08:03:09 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#19764: Downgrade reported as an ugprade Resent-From: Andreas Enge Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 14:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19764 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: Mark H Weaver , 19764@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 19764-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19764.142349379113000 (code B ref 19764); Mon, 09 Feb 2015 14:57:02 +0000 Received: (at 19764) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2015 14:56:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38377 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YKplH-0003Nc-11 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 09:56:31 -0500 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]:60866) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YKplE-0003NW-DO for 19764@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 09:56:29 -0500 Received: from debian ([82.66.2.95]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue104) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M4a32-1XOLO93CaC-00yfOM; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 15:56:02 +0100 Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 15:55:57 +0100 From: Andreas Enge Message-ID: <20150209145557.GA28061@debian> References: <878ugem3zl.fsf@gnu.org> <87r3u5hcqp.fsf@netris.org> <871tm0qnqr.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <871tm0qnqr.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:jUkGqAMN9zMsDJ5TxSvQyeN+0P917IebHU7tfhIREpKK2t+Tfx0 QM/+INie/uuZV1fsVId+/NEMbn62uxdq3qDRvMCU8p+WnE3Qye2Skk4Jilmym4NwhoXvMPa QsrXhssaRisgzn8bKAvA26yqZ2eurwYsbboWLaSzQXyLFtCYsspHfSX4ZW3NidKHxfNti7u d1LKlNEmO5jjZMF/mYvQQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Now, pseudo-upgrades are reported as downgrades. Namely, when the version number of a package does not increase, but something changes with respect to its inputs. I would suggest to treat them as upgrades. Andreas From unknown Sun Jun 22 08:03:09 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#19764: Downgrade reported as an ugprade Resent-From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 17:20:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19764 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Andreas Enge Cc: Mark H Weaver , 19764@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 19764-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19764.14235023654582 (code B ref 19764); Mon, 09 Feb 2015 17:20:02 +0000 Received: (at 19764) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2015 17:19:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38497 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YKrzY-0001Bq-SP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 12:19:25 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:57949 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YKrzW-0001Bi-Lq for 19764@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 12:19:23 -0500 Received: from pluto.bordeaux.inria.fr ([193.50.110.57]:50367 helo=pluto) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YKrzU-0000tb-Hi; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 12:19:21 -0500 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <878ugem3zl.fsf@gnu.org> <87r3u5hcqp.fsf@netris.org> <871tm0qnqr.fsf@gnu.org> <20150209145557.GA28061@debian> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 21 =?UTF-8?Q?Pluvi=C3=B4se?= an 223 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 18:19:17 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20150209145557.GA28061@debian> (Andreas Enge's message of "Mon, 9 Feb 2015 15:55:57 +0100") Message-ID: <87oap3m296.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Andreas Enge skribis: > Now, pseudo-upgrades are reported as downgrades. Namely, when the version > number of a package does not increase, but something changes with respect > to its inputs. I would suggest to treat them as upgrades. Indeed. Fixed in 3bea13b, thanks! Ludo=E2=80=99.