GNU bug report logs - #19692
"rm -f" without file operands specified displays error and exits with status 1 on QNX 6.3.2

Previous Next

Package: automake;

Reported by: Matt Kraai <kraai <at> ftbfs.org>

Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:47:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: pending

To reply to this bug, email your comments to 19692 AT debbugs.gnu.org.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-automake <at> gnu.org:
bug#19692; Package automake. (Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:47:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Matt Kraai <kraai <at> ftbfs.org>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-automake <at> gnu.org. (Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:47:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Matt Kraai <kraai <at> ftbfs.org>
To: bug-automake <at> gnu.org
Subject: "rm -f" without file operands specified displays error and exits
 with status 1 on QNX 6.3.2
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 06:54:47 -0800
Hi,

When "rm -f" is run without any file operands on QNX 6.3.2, it outputs
the following message and exits with status 1:

 rm: Must specify file[s] for removal.

My $PATH is

 /sbin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/photon/bin:/usr/photon/appbuilder:/opt/X11R6/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/usr/local/bin:/opt/bin:/opt/sbin:/usr/qnx632/host/qnx6/x86/usr/bin:/usr/qnx632/host/qnx6/x86/usr/sbin:/usr/qnx632/host/qnx6/x86/sbin:/usr/qnx632/host/qnx6/x86/bin:/usr/qnx632/host/qnx6/x86/usr/photon/appbuilder

-- 
Matt




Added indication that bug 19692 blocks10828 Request was from Mike Frysinger <vapier <at> gentoo.org> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Fri, 10 Dec 2021 05:45:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Added tag(s) pending. Request was from Mike Frysinger <vapier <at> gentoo.org> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Fri, 10 Dec 2021 05:52:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Information forwarded to bug-automake <at> gnu.org:
bug#19692; Package automake. (Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:54:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #12 received at 19692 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Karl Berry <karl <at> freefriends.org>
To: kraai <at> ftbfs.org
Cc: 19692 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#19692: "rm -f" without file operands specified displays error
 and exits with status 1 on QNX 6.3.2
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 14:52:50 -0700
Hi Matt - back in 2015
(https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=19692, sorry for the
delayed reply) you reported that your system failed the rm -f test. 

For the next automake release, we've removed this test and tried to
accept any rm. (More info: https://bugs.gnu.org/10828.)

If you have a chance to try an automake pretest to confirm this
(downloadable from https://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/automake-1.16j.tar.gz),
that would be great. --thanks, karl.




Information forwarded to bug-automake <at> gnu.org:
bug#19692; Package automake. (Sun, 28 Jan 2024 04:31:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #15 received at 19692 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Matthew James Kraai <kraai <at> ftbfs.org>
To: Karl Berry <karl <at> freefriends.org>
Cc: 19692 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#19692: "rm -f" without file operands specified displays error
 and exits with status 1 on QNX 6.3.2
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2024 20:30:13 -0800
Hi Karl,

I was able to bootstrap, configure, build and install automake-1.16j.  Is there any other testing I should do?

Matt

> On Jan 25, 2024, at 1:52 PM, Karl Berry <karl <at> freefriends.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi Matt - back in 2015
> (https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=19692, sorry for the
> delayed reply) you reported that your system failed the rm -f test.
> 
> For the next automake release, we've removed this test and tried to
> accept any rm. (More info: https://bugs.gnu.org/10828.)
> 
> If you have a chance to try an automake pretest to confirm this
> (downloadable from https://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/automake-1.16j.tar.gz),
> that would be great. --thanks, karl.





Information forwarded to bug-automake <at> gnu.org:
bug#19692; Package automake. (Sun, 28 Jan 2024 23:37:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #18 received at 19692 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Karl Berry <karl <at> freefriends.org>
To: kraai <at> ftbfs.org
Cc: 19692 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#19692: "rm -f" without file operands specified displays error
 and exits with status 1 on QNX 6.3.2
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2024 16:36:20 -0700
    I was able to bootstrap, configure, build and install
    automake-1.16j. 

Great!

    Is there any other testing I should do?

If you're up for it, you could run make -j8 check (or -jwhatever) just
to see if other tests fail. (It will take several hours to run without
the -j, although unfortunately the -j might also induce spurious
failures. Always looking for more data about this to try to make things
more robust.)

Thanks,
Karl





Information forwarded to bug-automake <at> gnu.org:
bug#19692; Package automake. (Mon, 29 Jan 2024 14:14:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #21 received at 19692 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Matthew James Kraai <kraai <at> ftbfs.org>
To: Karl Berry <karl <at> freefriends.org>
Cc: 19692 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#19692: "rm -f" without file operands specified displays error
 and exits with status 1 on QNX 6.3.2
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 06:12:31 -0800
Hi Karl,

When I run ‘make check’, it fails after passing t/pm/Wrap.pl with  the following error:

sh: >&3 : bad file descriptor
tap-driver.sh: fatal: I/O or internal error

Matt

> On Jan 28, 2024, at 3:36 PM, Karl Berry <karl <at> freefriends.org> wrote:
> 
>     I was able to bootstrap, configure, build and install
>    automake-1.16j.
> 
> Great!
> 
>    Is there any other testing I should do?
> 
> If you're up for it, you could run make -j8 check (or -jwhatever) just
> to see if other tests fail. (It will take several hours to run without
> the -j, although unfortunately the -j might also induce spurious
> failures. Always looking for more data about this to try to make things
> more robust.)
> 
> Thanks,
> Karl
> 





Information forwarded to bug-automake <at> gnu.org:
bug#19692; Package automake. (Mon, 29 Jan 2024 23:02:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #24 received at 19692 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Karl Berry <karl <at> freefriends.org>
To: kraai <at> ftbfs.org
Cc: 19692 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#19692: "rm -f" without file operands specified displays error
 and exits with status 1 on QNX 6.3.2
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 16:00:38 -0700
    When I run ‘make check’, it fails after
    passing t/pm/Wrap.pl with the following error:
    sh: >&3 : bad file descriptor
    tap-driver.sh: fatal: I/O or internal error

Thanks for trying, though sorry to see that result. It's not clear to me
what test is failing or what the environment is. File descriptor 3 is
used in tap-driver.sh, but seemingly not in a complicated way.

If you have time, please try running (without any -j, for simplicity):
  make VERBOSE=1 TESTS_ENVIRONMENT='echo RUNNING: "$$f";' check >chkout 2>&1

And, assuming it still fails, send the resulting
chkout and test-suite.log files (gzipped is best).

The TESTS_ENVIRONMENT value should print "RUNNING: <testname>" when a test
is begun, as well as the usual report when a test is finished. --thanks, karl.




This bug report was last modified 1 year and 138 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.