From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:20:30 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#19664 <19664@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#19664 <19664@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 24.4: eww.el why bury history buffer? Reply-To: bug#19664 <19664@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 10:20:30 +0000 retitle 19664 24.4: eww.el why bury history buffer? reassign 19664 emacs submitter 19664 Boruch Baum severity 19664 minor tag 19664 wontfix thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 23 11:06:57 2015 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jan 2015 16:06:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54487 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YEgl6-0004cm-8a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 11:06:56 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33792) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YEgl3-0004cV-Nv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 11:06:54 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YEgkx-0007lw-Ih for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 11:06:48 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:40328) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YEgkx-0007lr-Eb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 11:06:47 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35495) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YEgkw-0001Bi-EZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 11:06:47 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YEgkr-0007kN-R1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 11:06:46 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.com ([74.208.4.200]:64795) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YEgkr-0007kG-KX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 11:06:41 -0500 Received: from [10.66.172.112] ([47.21.4.242]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmxus001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LZi5S-1Xrhoi2Hd6-00lXaG for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 17:06:40 +0100 Message-ID: <54C27198.1010705@gmx.com> Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 11:06:48 -0500 From: Boruch Baum User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 24.4: eww.el why bury history buffer? OpenPGP: url=hkp://keys.gnupg.net Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="CNSucKr86AvoJbHU8ludmAdGElL59WPPf" X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:lcuo9bKZbYkzRsSalilUqVHmEfcF7reaYEIEmLCrIG+xAiKbo7K 24rUun+rlVNlvYmd8RbTzaCweDVeG4UjTsL4B4lT4TzMh7XdaCWToLHC9TiZAnooEM6bvV+ AOTEbhMt5jmrrDFHw19eLcfDd2rpi7+xn+nBmYSga1YltHnChEG3uzsYCRML8RJSeVa/Gtf c6rcUGHneefZYAWyk2oiA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --CNSucKr86AvoJbHU8ludmAdGElL59WPPf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Function eww-history-browse buries the eww-history buffer. That's undesirable. The following seems to work for me. (defun eww-history-browse () ; improper use of 'when'. replaced with 'if (not' so that upo\ n error, the remainder of the function is not performed ; no need to quit window and bury buffer. undesirable, in fac\ t ; do need to get position in history "Browse the history under point in eww." (interactive) (if (not (equal (buffer-name) "*eww history*")) (user-error "Current buffer is not the eww history buffer\ ") (setq element (get-text-property (line-beginning-position)\ 'eww-history) position (1- (line-number-at-pos)) history eww-history) (if (not element) (user-error "No history on the current line") (if (get-buffer "*eww*") (set-buffer "*eww*") (set-buffer (get-buffer-create "*eww*")) (remove-overlays) (eww-mode)) (setq eww-history-position position eww-history history) (eww-restore-history element)))) --=20 hkp://keys.gnupg.net CA45 09B5 5351 7C11 A9D1 7286 0036 9E45 1595 8BC0 --CNSucKr86AvoJbHU8ludmAdGElL59WPPf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUwnGwAAoJEDvrUfDmCx9LxukQAJkbAGOtHony0TtQ6j5dJB8e SGpOI21PvlXeNK0Qim/SjjF4nDWcKzPuflXFfakscCPc0tjfHGzqNvYKN/COj3yO JP/kdtMlGTxFdRBccCJyukZFDJBwIt2NMpFwrA5B9c+v4iTkFqfpNaFESiMXSsXr gyI5OgfmD7EihvWBKBtRocq1qxL5T///2yEdBsWwNnF+1zHzvfAQm4eREQpEYUWr c/NywsNvToQ0Da+xuKrIvqLokAd5Sn+zjv3dRx399fvelNYoPx+sonCrh4DKSCv5 BunUm3xK9ekvaohuvDWuha16cqPU6r6VgEFpo2vfm8HVkwMv2V/G4OPi3928fB3q 548IEGuDI/a3AwxvwrMsDnh5tJSxQiJXIgoR1R5KRGPDFulCDtIENVXl8gJ9PTZt DHKtBkgFhG8gYT6UHjqOXDMIu5vLDbKyDEkNuEtK8QWZgSmCf/RTBM5viOZETnmd c/L/NkUMzZS8+xH7WtOwnjiWttd9GCf4Aeo22U0HYfQqIm2+VzR56X7PyPJaBLCH nrmTtclv3CK7PdY/R8bhsDkeEv8MRzNCgvjUmrvbaDn3FHybhCcxkD9HTgey6Hah 7o71QIuJ+KT1gPB3lBsPaaMWFDtKX4jgzuakKcsysLHaklUEv34qW4X3r9rvMrlP 0dtZnczxmxgnbdpLgVcA =iSNj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --CNSucKr86AvoJbHU8ludmAdGElL59WPPf-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jan 24 21:53:34 2015 Received: (at 19664) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jan 2015 02:53:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55512 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YFDKP-0001Gi-FU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 21:53:33 -0500 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:60105) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YFDKO-0001GY-8Z for 19664@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 21:53:32 -0500 Received: from [27.96.197.126] (helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1YFDK4-0001D8-6c; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 03:53:12 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Boruch Baum Subject: Re: bug#19664: 24.4: eww.el why bury history buffer? References: <54C27198.1010705@gmx.com> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAMFBMVEVHicja5eT///7///9M jspNjbx0epFilcZimMyrq7YLDQ5BdrExPFpDh8dWlMlWltBDJEBgAAABWElEQVQ4jcXUL27DMBQG cIPSgSQo0C4azS4wENyRBVWKNGKpUunU3aBBm5JIld4FBnKFaheYCnqBsWGPFi17z//mJC0a2Kcq qb+fHYNYYTcXwv4bhBtk+uegjgF4nDb8OuKpSGshLOxWACBXIOVOSsBLYyESQkQi5hEXHP8KPrcg ARpck0I93DyLAHAX4OnDCIRLLILMWbYZ5MneE5btKW8fo7QaJrWFScsMBIXPFcKwnM3yPL9lzMGR yvw3LNFwHLYUDcdJbQAfbEe9Sf6pwU2/632UUgQ0fxHUff+tgXr11U9h2lu4zxdK+e5UVS+0iQZl AUsbA7iAnlUFeSYolYZTCNuNA1UNe4JiAlvzaotyBO6dF3oJHgM/24OVMI8GyhAUFsWy1aAXmXux 1Mdp39pzFeZA8XAI8t51HYIfd2EQurP5M7zKtZQriRnDei0PhARwNsnFL8MPu3QqLeJkL3kAAAAA SUVORK5CYII= X-Now-Playing: burn's _304 (Moon Base Big)_: "Wire!Red_Barked_Tree!01-Please_Take" Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 13:52:55 +1100 In-Reply-To: <54C27198.1010705@gmx.com> (Boruch Baum's message of "Fri, 23 Jan 2015 11:06:48 -0500") Message-ID: <8761bvvaew.fsf@building.gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MailScanner-ID: 1YFDK4-0001D8-6c X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1422759193.6234@UwBHTp9Hf1bhy0b+0azSyw X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 19664 Cc: 19664@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Boruch Baum writes: > Function eww-history-browse buries the eww-history buffer. That's > undesirable. Hm... Yeah, that does seem really odd. I'll make it stop doing that. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/ From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jan 24 21:58:01 2015 Received: (at 19664) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jan 2015 02:58:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55516 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YFDOi-0001Mu-Gr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 21:58:00 -0500 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:42283) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YFDOg-0001Ml-7h for 19664@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 21:57:58 -0500 Received: from [27.96.197.126] (helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1YFDON-0001FF-I7; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 03:57:40 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Boruch Baum Subject: Re: bug#19664: 24.4: eww.el why bury history buffer? References: <54C27198.1010705@gmx.com> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAMFBMVEVHicja5eT///7///9M jspNjbx0epFilcZimMyrq7YLDQ5BdrExPFpDh8dWlMlWltBDJEBgAAABWElEQVQ4jcXUL27DMBQG cIPSgSQo0C4azS4wENyRBVWKNGKpUunU3aBBm5JIld4FBnKFaheYCnqBsWGPFi17z//mJC0a2Kcq qb+fHYNYYTcXwv4bhBtk+uegjgF4nDb8OuKpSGshLOxWACBXIOVOSsBLYyESQkQi5hEXHP8KPrcg ARpck0I93DyLAHAX4OnDCIRLLILMWbYZ5MneE5btKW8fo7QaJrWFScsMBIXPFcKwnM3yPL9lzMGR yvw3LNFwHLYUDcdJbQAfbEe9Sf6pwU2/632UUgQ0fxHUff+tgXr11U9h2lu4zxdK+e5UVS+0iQZl AUsbA7iAnlUFeSYolYZTCNuNA1UNe4JiAlvzaotyBO6dF3oJHgM/24OVMI8GyhAUFsWy1aAXmXux 1Mdp39pzFeZA8XAI8t51HYIfd2EQurP5M7zKtZQriRnDei0PhARwNsnFL8MPu3QqLeJkL3kAAAAA SUVORK5CYII= X-Now-Playing: burn's _304 (Moon Base Big)_: "Wire!Red_Barked_Tree!01-Please_Take" Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 13:57:29 +1100 In-Reply-To: <54C27198.1010705@gmx.com> (Boruch Baum's message of "Fri, 23 Jan 2015 11:06:48 -0500") Message-ID: <871tmjva7a.fsf@building.gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MailScanner-ID: 1YFDON-0001FF-I7 X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1422759460.56949@yNLDqwqGiVNyka+E+PivJA X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 19664 Cc: 19664@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Boruch Baum writes: > Function eww-history-browse buries the eww-history buffer. That's > undesirable. The following seems to work for me. I changed my mind. The way it works seem to be the way Emacs does most of these "help" buffers. You hit `H', and the frame is split into two windows. Hitting `RET' on an item removes the history window and you're back to just one eww buffer. So I don't really see anything wrong here. What is it that you find undesirable? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/ From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jan 25 02:20:00 2015 Received: (at 19664) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jan 2015 07:20:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55566 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YFHUG-0001wx-6c for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 02:20:00 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.com ([74.208.4.200]:60232) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YFHUD-0001wj-Mq for 19664@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 02:19:58 -0500 Received: from [10.178.41.148] ([47.21.4.242]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmxus001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MX1tq-1Y9s7Y09Ho-00Vw6d; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 08:19:44 +0100 Message-ID: <54C4992E.6030006@gmx.com> Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 02:20:14 -0500 From: Boruch Baum User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#19664: 24.4: eww.el why bury history buffer? References: <54C27198.1010705@gmx.com> <871tmjva7a.fsf@building.gnus.org> In-Reply-To: <871tmjva7a.fsf@building.gnus.org> OpenPGP: url=hkp://keys.gnupg.net Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="v5D6SOT8omfcNAKBTbMbnA88tF4Qkbo3U" X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:O+CYg9QHnNehxyHNA4dBQ3xqs+3vSSp89afdmECJBIVFGuhr3sP tf8E8Pn5eoX/eCQmEtYQP7fGQPNsMMR6IhzYki9H2LvfzQvDYe9xbt9GTgRhs8qb/qWEkt2 KeA/rx9nFTNhjvdg0zx+PQD2+B/TixYOvr7NZpS4UVFhK0AsXAi6HNjk15Si7OZQT0BiBMY q3lP3q46TBSk0LI9IfXFg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 19664 Cc: 19664@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --v5D6SOT8omfcNAKBTbMbnA88tF4Qkbo3U Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 01/24/2015 09:57 PM, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Boruch Baum writes: >=20 >> Function eww-history-browse buries the eww-history buffer. That's >> undesirable. The following seems to work for me. >=20 > I changed my mind. The way it works seem to be the way Emacs does most= > of these "help" buffers. You hit `H', and the frame is split into two > windows. Hitting `RET' on an item removes the history window and you'r= e > back to just one eww buffer. >=20 > So I don't really see anything wrong here. What is it that you find > undesirable? >=20 Personally, I keep the frame split in C-x 3 fashion, and like having *eww histry* next to *eww* for reading and reviewing pages offline. It's not a big deal, just a user preference, what I find easy on my eyes. --=20 hkp://keys.gnupg.net CA45 09B5 5351 7C11 A9D1 7286 0036 9E45 1595 8BC0 --v5D6SOT8omfcNAKBTbMbnA88tF4Qkbo3U Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUxJkuAAoJEDvrUfDmCx9LBosP/01jFNQebqZmow6JbvwFe2WJ 5VTypxrNioSl1AZVVwcFl9hoNSi2uG2u5f8yag+B6l1pTzYUMvJvnFTQFxc/o31q q0QhbAhI/CNapvxuM+bGiW2NV2DgP1K+Ee1k5QbEtbepCmA58kF6NVivqqYyETNI IlEBBNHYA4XdpccBKTqYl40cbILo2T29nIr8A6+8x5HFmk+DgZcqvy5DPQJcAj3I rFu0svG3jFphxUXuOwcdyjepbAyGipCiRJ81eoxPvQxI8kAylZhIoq94ywlGMSpb pt8tS+impWh4WFrZW/s+EG8hVvWkmagJnI769Z7ZW44QSivJSytP+7kV7lpJZFYM gsxVEw+yiLANrYiBxbGo+jxnSih/xtD2ajjF1EYrZM06x0A5RGXcm7mXPsROS1mp nvFOfj0jwysqwm8xM/0sFCxtuUSWxj/zAOx2vCCNsD4SQSkmUtUOJQnrw58M7mhT LG9N/C4XKj5Z5nHNn5/785v9WubLzZu0SEElYsjw5cPCRNHdiLOuz5VSV0SJ1OC3 h2h4b1E8ou3x7xzvqfi5ckPn0YZ4o+6A7I9ZmP8AAL2KzotQ0DhRXDMeF770XtpR fyp7q3wZCAjqqSICV6FBoc0boOWOyyAuBmUwSGd3xKctiz8Z8I1o6l1PLucHIfJA Mrlp/ajChJlf3inDIz4X =XsFx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --v5D6SOT8omfcNAKBTbMbnA88tF4Qkbo3U-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jan 25 20:53:37 2015 Received: (at 19664) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jan 2015 01:53:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56411 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YFYrx-0000o3-1z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 20:53:37 -0500 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:54814) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YFYru-0000nu-HP for 19664@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 20:53:35 -0500 Received: from [27.96.197.126] (helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1YFYrb-0006px-NJ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 02:53:16 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Boruch Baum Subject: Re: bug#19664: 24.4: eww.el why bury history buffer? References: <54C27198.1010705@gmx.com> <871tmjva7a.fsf@building.gnus.org> <54C4992E.6030006@gmx.com> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:53:06 +1100 In-Reply-To: <54C4992E.6030006@gmx.com> (Boruch Baum's message of "Sun, 25 Jan 2015 02:20:14 -0500") Message-ID: <87wq4ai9z1.fsf@building.gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MailScanner-ID: 1YFYrb-0006px-NJ X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1422841996.85357@IO7fhACB2h1T9+LDhErbeg X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 19664 Cc: 19664@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Boruch Baum writes: > Personally, I keep the frame split in C-x 3 fashion, and like having > *eww histry* next to *eww* for reading and reviewing pages offline. It's > not a big deal, just a user preference, what I find easy on my eyes. Right. I can see wanting to do that. It would be consistent with the way `M-x grep' works, for instance, but that's used for scanning quickly through many hits, while the eww history (and bookmarks) aren't usually used that way. I think. So I'm closing this bug. If somebody wants to revisit this later, they can do that. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/ From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jan 25 20:54:03 2015 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jan 2015 01:54:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56415 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YFYsN-0000pE-Gb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 20:54:03 -0500 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:54820) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YFYsK-0000of-LH for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 20:54:01 -0500 Received: from [27.96.197.126] (helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1YFYs1-0006qH-2q for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 02:53:41 +0100 Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:53:31 +1100 Message-Id: <87vbjui9yc.fsf@building.gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #19664 X-MailScanner-ID: 1YFYs1-0006qH-2q X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1422842023.49122@2fyZo4dmFyl22yFPMUNPeg X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) tags 19664 wontfix close 19664 From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:20:30 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 12:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator