Subject: bug#19576: write-file writes the wrong buffer

From: martin rudalics <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2015 19:44:07 +0100

> We could run both types of hooks, couldn't we?

As I said we do that already for splitting and deleting windows.  So we
obviously could.  But this means that packages run the same function
twice because they are used to run the same function in both hooks.

 > The documentation
 > seems to suggest that both of them should be run in this situation.

‘window-configuration-change-hook’ shouldn't run since the window
configuration does not change.

 > As for "can of worms", we could make that change on master and see
 > what breaks.  WDYT?

It won't break anything.  But why should we OT1H make
‘window-size-change-functions’ more efficient when OTOH we call it after
we already called ‘window-configuration-change-hook’?

martin