From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 09 00:31:08 2015 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jan 2015 05:31:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40618 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9SA7-0004iI-8k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 00:31:08 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40347) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9RzS-0004Rn-07 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 00:20:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9RzR-0007UY-7k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 00:20:05 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:33816) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9RzR-0007UH-53 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 00:20:05 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42061) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9RzQ-0006Eo-9k for bug-automake@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 00:20:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9RzN-0007IL-4q for bug-automake@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 00:20:04 -0500 Received: from vega.sra-tohoku.jp ([58.12.125.173]:52433) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9RzM-0007Hf-Ne for bug-automake@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 00:20:01 -0500 Received: from vega.sra-tohoku.jp (localhost4 [127.0.0.1]) by vega.sra-tohoku.jp (8.13.8/8.13.4/vega) with SMTP id t095Jq0R018405; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 14:19:52 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from kabe@sra-tohoku.co.jp) From: Message-ID: <1839909201514.S6lcrQFe180128$@sra-tohoku.co.jp.msg> To: 10819@debbugs.gnu.org, bug-automake@gnu.org Subject: info: non-POSIX "rm -f" still alive (NetBSD-1.6) X-Mailer: mnews [version 1.22PL5] 2002-11-27(Wed) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 14:19:52 +0900 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 00:31:05 -0500 Cc: kabe@sra-tohoku.co.jp X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) Since XZ Utils (xz-5.2.0) started to use the new autoconf, my system (NetBSD 1.6) stumbled upon the configure's ACCEPT_INFERIOR_RM_PROGRAM check. This only indicates that I'm too lazy to upgrade the OS nor install /usr/local/gnu/bin/rm. Just a vote that there is a "in wild" system here. -- kabe From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Nov 22 21:34:55 2020 Received: (at 19541) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Nov 2020 02:34:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48646 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kh1gt-0000qc-2K for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 21:34:55 -0500 Received: from freefriends.org ([96.88.95.60]:47126) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kh1gl-0000q8-Ru; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 21:34:48 -0500 X-Envelope-From: karl@freefriends.org Received: from freefriends.org (freefriends.org [96.88.95.60]) by freefriends.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 0AN2Ykvu013687 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 22 Nov 2020 19:34:47 -0700 Received: (from apache@localhost) by freefriends.org (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id 0AN2YjZH013678; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 19:34:45 -0700 Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2020 19:34:45 -0700 Message-Id: <202011230234.0AN2YjZH013678@freefriends.org> From: Karl Berry To: kabe@sra-tohoku.co.jp Subject: Re: bug#19541: info: non-POSIX "rm -f" still alive (NetBSD-1.6) In-Reply-To: <1839909201514.S6lcrQFe180128$@sra-tohoku.co.jp.msg> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 19541 Cc: 19541@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) my system (NetBSD 1.6) stumbled upon the configure's ACCEPT_INFERIOR_RM_PROGRAM check. I'm guess that in the five years since you sent this report (sorry for the ridiculously delayed reply), you've probably been forced to change your system. (I use old systems too, but haven't been able to get away with quite that old. :) In any case, it's supposed to be possible to still allow "rm -f" to pass by setting the envvar ACCEPT_INFERIOR_RM_PROGRAM to "yes", and rerun configure. (E.g., message shown at bugs.gnu.org/42529.) So, closing this for automake ... --thanks for the report, karl. From unknown Tue Jun 17 20:42:39 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2020 12:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator