From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jan 01 10:35:51 2015 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Jan 2015 15:35:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34535 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y6hmx-0001Nr-4T for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jan 2015 10:35:51 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40715) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y6hmu-0001Nh-KG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jan 2015 10:35:49 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y6hmt-00044O-11 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jan 2015 10:35:48 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,MISSING_SUBJECT, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:44552) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y6hms-00044I-UQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jan 2015 10:35:46 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42436) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y6hmn-0006o0-K7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jan 2015 10:35:46 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y6hmi-000422-8q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jan 2015 10:35:41 -0500 Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:45831) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y6hmh-00041D-VA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jan 2015 10:35:36 -0500 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NHI00D008G8LR00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jan 2015 17:35:34 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NHI00DBR8N9E230@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Thu, 01 Jan 2015 17:35:34 +0200 (IST) Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2015 17:35:28 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: <8761cr79i5.fsf@web.de> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Michael Heerdegen Message-id: <83ppaybjjz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1465149162.16157.1419518913269.JavaMail.help@alum.mit.edu> <8761cr79i5.fsf@web.de> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: bjvilfan@gmail.com, bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) [Moved this here from help-gnu-emacs. For the original thread, see http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-gnu-emacs/2014-12/msg00379.html.] > From: Michael Heerdegen > Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 23:13:54 +0100 > Cc: Emacs Help , > Stefan Monnier > > Bostjan Vilfan writes: > > (progn > (define-key global-map [tool-bar bvdotex] 'tex-file) > (tool-bar-local-item "save" 'tex-file 'bvdotex tool-bar-map > :help "Process file with default tex command")) > > Evaluate it, and you have to "do some things" until the item is displayed. > No way of redisplay helps to force the displaying of the button, and it > seems to appear after a random command. > > I guess all the Emacs modes set up the toolbar before it is actually > displayed. Doing it afterwards doesn't seem to work reliably. I don't > see such a limitation being described in the manual This should fix the problem: (progn (define-key global-map [tool-bar bvdotex] 'tex-file) (tool-bar-local-item "save" 'tex-file 'bvdotex tool-bar-map :help "Process file with default tex command") (force-mode-line-update) (garbage-collect)) The last line is the reason that you need to "do some things" in order for the tool bar to get updated: you need to eval enough stuff so that Emacs enters GC. This is a clear bug, and it has 2 parts, an easy one and a harder one. The easy part is to add a call to force-mode-line-update to 2 functions that modify tool-bar-map (done in commit 5a9710f on the emacs-24 branch). The harder part, the one that requires a GC, has something to do with the fact that we use a hash table to avoid recomputing tool-bar items when the tool bar didn't change. From tool-bar.el: (global-set-key [tool-bar] `(menu-item ,(purecopy "tool bar") ignore :filter tool-bar-make-keymap)) (defconst tool-bar-keymap-cache (make-hash-table :weakness t :test 'equal)) (defun tool-bar-make-keymap (&optional _ignore) "Generate an actual keymap from `tool-bar-map'. Its main job is to figure out which images to use based on the display's color capability and based on the available image libraries." (let ((key (cons (frame-terminal) tool-bar-map))) (or (gethash key tool-bar-keymap-cache) (puthash key (tool-bar-make-keymap-1) tool-bar-keymap-cache)))) We started doing this in Emacs 23, and sure enough, this problem didn't exist in Emacs 22, where just evaluating the original progn above, without the last two lines, immediately caused the tool bar to be updated. Emacs 23 already exhibits the problem. By stepping through tool-bar-make-keymap, I've discovered that after the tool-bar-map is updated, gethash still returns non-nil, as if the old value of tool-bar-map were still in effect. So we don't recompute the updated keymap from tool-bar-map, and redisplay doesn't think the tool bar changed and should be redrawn. Mind you, this is on MS-Windows, which represents the toolkits where Emacs itself displays the tool bar; the GTK and NS builds might have different or additional quirks. I hope the above will give enough info to keymap experts to fix the remaining problem (please do that on the emacs-24 branch). From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jan 01 10:59:32 2015 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Jan 2015 15:59:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34540 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y6i9s-0001xn-Ef for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jan 2015 10:59:32 -0500 Received: from mtaout27.012.net.il ([80.179.55.183]:45454) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y6i9o-0001xc-98 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jan 2015 10:59:29 -0500 Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout27.012.net.il by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NHI00B0098YZ400@mtaout27.012.net.il> for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jan 2015 17:51:36 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NHI0016F9E0F1A0@mtaout27.012.net.il> for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jan 2015 17:51:36 +0200 (IST) Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2015 17:59:21 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#19480: (no subject) In-reply-to: <83ppaybjjz.fsf@gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Message-id: <83iogqbig6.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1465149162.16157.1419518913269.JavaMail.help@alum.mit.edu> <8761cr79i5.fsf@web.de> <83ppaybjjz.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: 3.0 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: retitle 19480 Tool-bar modifications not reflected on display [...] Content analysis details: (3.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 SLIGHTLY_BAD_SUBJECT Subject contains something slightly spammy -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.183 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 3.0 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: retitle 19480 Tool-bar modifications not reflected on display [...] Content analysis details: (3.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.183 listed in list.dnswl.org] 2.0 SLIGHTLY_BAD_SUBJECT Subject contains something slightly spammy 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) retitle 19480 Tool-bar modifications not reflected on display From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jan 01 15:38:06 2015 Received: (at 19480) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Jan 2015 20:38:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34651 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y6mVR-000310-QB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jan 2015 15:38:06 -0500 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.11]:57452) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y6mVQ-00030s-1G for 19480@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jan 2015 15:38:04 -0500 Received: from drachen.dragon ([90.186.23.243]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LoYjO-1XeadC29Qw-00ga8d; Thu, 01 Jan 2015 21:37:56 +0100 From: Michael Heerdegen To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#19480: (no subject) References: <1465149162.16157.1419518913269.JavaMail.help@alum.mit.edu> <8761cr79i5.fsf@web.de> <83ppaybjjz.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2015 21:37:52 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83ppaybjjz.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 01 Jan 2015 17:35:28 +0200") Message-ID: <87lhlmdyov.fsf@web.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:JQ5JbROd9BbPPIVlYfJctwr7+q7CJsrYhbVCSS0fg0YlqXEdrL/ UYAFc4k4Pxno4bzFKj2QdxWehcMPCEcLPwewULF0g8XFBKxZjFlcoRfEGV1NVUzbbrjckAp 97gc/jmzd2sGuMP06yKgR4bfsxY9R2c+exoL3Y8tRFFqyBHxx8un57V/Ht8w4+LWFmWiV1L rNsuTbQVYISIdz3twBUGQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Eli, > This should fix the problem: > > (progn > (define-key global-map [tool-bar bvdotex] 'tex-file) > (tool-bar-local-item "save" 'tex-file 'bvdotex tool-bar-map > :help "Process file with default tex command") > (force-mode-line-update) > (garbage-collect)) [...] Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 SLIGHTLY_BAD_SUBJECT Subject contains something slightly spammy 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (michael_heerdegen[at]web.de) -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.227.17.11 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 19480 Cc: bjvilfan@gmail.com, 19480@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Eli, > This should fix the problem: > > (progn > (define-key global-map [tool-bar bvdotex] 'tex-file) > (tool-bar-local-item "save" 'tex-file 'bvdotex tool-bar-map > :help "Process file with default tex command") > (force-mode-line-update) > (garbage-collect)) [...] Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.227.17.11 listed in list.dnswl.org] 2.0 SLIGHTLY_BAD_SUBJECT Subject contains something slightly spammy 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (michael_heerdegen[at]web.de) -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record Hi Eli, > This should fix the problem: > > (progn > (define-key global-map [tool-bar bvdotex] 'tex-file) > (tool-bar-local-item "save" 'tex-file 'bvdotex tool-bar-map > :help "Process file with default tex command") > (force-mode-line-update) > (garbage-collect)) I can confirm that this avoids the problem under Debian Gnu/Linux using the GTK+ toolkit. Michael. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jan 01 15:56:55 2015 Received: (at 19480) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Jan 2015 20:56:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34656 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y6mnf-0003RL-Fg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jan 2015 15:56:55 -0500 Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:33009) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y6mnc-0003R9-2a for 19480@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jan 2015 15:56:53 -0500 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NHI00H00N07G900@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for 19480@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jan 2015 22:56:50 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NHI00HZYNIPCC40@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Thu, 01 Jan 2015 22:56:50 +0200 (IST) Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2015 22:56:46 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#19480: (no subject) In-reply-to: <87lhlmdyov.fsf@web.de> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Michael Heerdegen Message-id: <83a922b4oh.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1465149162.16157.1419518913269.JavaMail.help@alum.mit.edu> <8761cr79i5.fsf@web.de> <83ppaybjjz.fsf@gnu.org> <87lhlmdyov.fsf@web.de> X-Spam-Score: 3.0 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > From: Michael Heerdegen > Cc: bjvilfan@gmail.com, 19480@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2015 21:37:52 +0100 > > Hi Eli, > > > This should fix the problem: > > > > (progn > > (define-key global-map [tool-bar bvdotex] 'tex-file) > > (tool-bar-local-item "save" 'tex-file 'bvdotex tool-bar-map > > :help "Process file with default tex command") > > (force-mode-line-update) > > (garbage-collect)) > > I can confirm that this avoids the problem under Debian Gnu/Linux using > the GTK+ toolkit. [...] Content analysis details: (3.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 SLIGHTLY_BAD_SUBJECT Subject contains something slightly spammy -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.169 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 19480 Cc: bjvilfan@gmail.com, 19480@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 3.0 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > From: Michael Heerdegen > Cc: bjvilfan@gmail.com, 19480@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2015 21:37:52 +0100 > > Hi Eli, > > > This should fix the problem: > > > > (progn > > (define-key global-map [tool-bar bvdotex] 'tex-file) > > (tool-bar-local-item "save" 'tex-file 'bvdotex tool-bar-map > > :help "Process file with default tex command") > > (force-mode-line-update) > > (garbage-collect)) > > I can confirm that this avoids the problem under Debian Gnu/Linux using > the GTK+ toolkit. [...] Content analysis details: (3.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.169 listed in list.dnswl.org] 2.0 SLIGHTLY_BAD_SUBJECT Subject contains something slightly spammy 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) > From: Michael Heerdegen > Cc: bjvilfan@gmail.com, 19480@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2015 21:37:52 +0100 > > Hi Eli, > > > This should fix the problem: > > > > (progn > > (define-key global-map [tool-bar bvdotex] 'tex-file) > > (tool-bar-local-item "save" 'tex-file 'bvdotex tool-bar-map > > :help "Process file with default tex command") > > (force-mode-line-update) > > (garbage-collect)) > > I can confirm that this avoids the problem under Debian Gnu/Linux using > the GTK+ toolkit. Thanks for checking. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 03 12:58:42 2022 Received: (at 19480) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 May 2022 16:58:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40916 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nlvrG-0006GV-JZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2022 12:58:42 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:57488) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nlvrF-0006GF-4T for 19480@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2022 12:58:41 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=K5LmwbcsolThbVAHFFp9QOYmvb5lzVQ1a/MR+y9LHQs=; b=Nx35UowVin91MSFOOEHhMkeg4m l5+FES/rSLH6VyiG3fCIsxM8WxtdapKJ6+PWM2/iyWWPULGUJaIq0NxgZcMWcrYQa7Eq0pl1VxfNa 19C9VNw1EtTxyeryynWdixD93XX3hBSpK4Nijp21y+uwY5dogK6IVFrOkwJlQBFuugoM=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nlvr5-00006S-NM; Tue, 03 May 2022 18:58:33 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#19480: Tool-bar modifications not reflected on display References: <1465149162.16157.1419518913269.JavaMail.help@alum.mit.edu> <8761cr79i5.fsf@web.de> <83ppaybjjz.fsf@gnu.org> X-Now-Playing: Peter Gabriel's _Peter Gabriel 4_: "The Rhythm Of The Heat" Date: Tue, 03 May 2022 18:58:31 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83ppaybjjz.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 01 Jan 2015 17:35:28 +0200") Message-ID: <871qxav9hk.fsf_-_@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: This was fixed for Emacs 29 in the bug#43397 bug report, so I'm also closing this one. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 19480 Cc: Michael Heerdegen , bjvilfan@gmail.com, 19480@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) This was fixed for Emacs 29 in the bug#43397 bug report, so I'm also closing this one. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 03 12:58:46 2022 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 May 2022 16:58:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40919 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nlvrK-0006Gn-Pa for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2022 12:58:46 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:57506) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nlvrJ-0006GN-6C for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2022 12:58:45 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=7r0CwXfYSP4dn63AwFgHYn/qtvGQNvoKdOG3oF+tymA=; b=I4wN+Q5O7B6YPAiMc2VRPJYhI8 Ha3BadEVU+sQdnRjb+DGrYtdNdSBIiTtTUXGzOZliX0hzClC2DrQ/vXxT/M6wyW0ebCeX3yp08k5z 3tvuz9BeQQfJDEoki83784niKap1+Ye7rjtau20wN0HdHaL5gAErDN1I4qyR3aBHDNAU=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nlvrB-00006f-Lr for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2022 18:58:39 +0200 Date: Tue, 03 May 2022 18:58:37 +0200 Message-Id: <87zgjytuwy.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #19480 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 19480 29.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) close 19480 29.1 quit From unknown Fri Aug 15 15:32:53 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2022 11:24:08 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator