GNU bug report logs -
#19479
Package manager vulnerable
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> gmail.com> writes:
> Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se> writes:
>
>>> Is this a function (rather than a variable) just so it can be in the
>>> same cl-flet* as do-check?
>>
>> I'm not sure I understand; it should be a function instead of a variable
>> because there is logic in there to match `(secure-hash-algorithms)'
>> against `(package-desc-checksums pkg-desc)' and signal an error.
>
> Ah, I think had forgotten about/was confused by cl-flet's (FUNC (lambda
> ARGLIST ...)) syntax when I wrote that. Although I suppose you could
> make it a plain variable by moving it inside do-check's lambda (not sure
> if that's an improvement)?
Sure, you could do that. I guess it's mostly down to style, but I
personally feel like that change would make the code a little bit harder
to read here.
This bug report was last modified 4 years and 203 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.