Subject: Re: bug#19457: 24.4; exec_sentinel_error_handler and read_process_output_error_handler

From: Stefan Monnier <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2015 20:58:39 -0500

> So all in all, it seems like the caching function has to return completions
> for an empty prefix, and then cache that. That might be pretty costly
> at times.

Indeed.  And for the "error" case, the caching is yet different.  In my
experience, there can't really be a "one stop" caching solution.

        Stefan