From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 16 04:32:19 2014 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Dec 2014 09:32:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47432 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y0oUM-0000n8-Uc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 04:32:19 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34327) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y0oUK-0000my-OS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 04:32:17 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y0oUJ-0005hs-M7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 04:32:16 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:38950) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y0oUJ-0005hn-IP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 04:32:15 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36041) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y0oUI-0007Gi-Mv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 04:32:15 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y0oUH-0005hQ-MY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 04:32:14 -0500 Received: from mail-ig0-x22e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22e]:62759) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y0oUH-0005hE-ID for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 04:32:13 -0500 Received: by mail-ig0-f174.google.com with SMTP id hn15so6560816igb.1 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 01:32:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=GvsuBBK4XWXCpfcjXO5lN9nZ5Ue1q1UP3egbB8hZdmU=; b=qewi+HxLylyiqkbTwX+tIJyJo+3ifhgFoi9kMfEyoxySj/szdmwLjAXiHgy0LO7Xfs gtirJe20aajV84fhpWCAhG6520SnmuEOq22CRq/Kh1HFaNk3DKj1uzjruPrhp7oPkQd5 gnyKlbI+Gy7THvoAfqZubuz2kYYRq2KlHeXRZiqWAZ9Ffj35azZoCaR6eAj6rvz6jels 1I+wIQMPIaPCQ9KBa2409eXayhbSdaGtKJFgFc4JH7sbBKOQ5NmwxJYBe6C9SDxNsmA0 XshTNura9Fs5H2OXXXRAguGfhXBnRr+QIadR7gqDSrj8kE6GCAdl+1JJbRocX54JIX6D cFNg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.128.138 with SMTP id k10mr33447607ioi.69.1418722333116; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 01:32:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.43.125.2 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 01:32:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 10:32:13 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Emacs searches for dabbrevs in archive buffers From: Paul Pogonyshev To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113fbcc4b3506b050a5208af X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) --001a113fbcc4b3506b050a5208af Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Reproducible with 'emacs -q': * In a freshly started Emacs, open an archive, e.g. a .tar.gz file in a buffer. * Switch to another buffer, type a couple of letters and then start pressing 'M-/' (dabbrev-expand). * It is very likely you will hit a "very useful" dabbrev in binary form taken from the archive. E.g. I opened a large tarball, then switched to *scratch*, typed "tz", and the very first dabbrev I got was "tz\327r". Request: Emacs should ignore archive and other binary buffers when generating dabbrevs. There are some settings to ignore buffers by name, but this would rather ignore buffers by mode. Also, this should be the default because I cannot imagine binary dabbrevs being useful to more than maybe 0.01% of users. Reproduced on a recent Emacs trunk. Paul --001a113fbcc4b3506b050a5208af Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Reproducible with 'emacs -q':

* In a freshly started Emacs, open an archive, e.g. a .tar.gz = file in a buffer.
* Switch to another buffer, type a couple of let= ters and then start pressing 'M-/' (dabbrev-expand).
* It = is very likely you will hit a "very useful" dabbrev in binary for= m taken from the archive. E.g. I opened a large tarball, then switched to *= scratch*, typed "tz", and the very first dabbrev I got was "= tz\327r".

Request: Emacs should ignore archive and other = binary buffers when generating dabbrevs. There are some settings to ignore = buffers by name, but this would rather ignore buffers by mode. Also, this = should be the default because I cannot imagine binary dabbrevs being useful= to more than maybe 0.01% of users.

Reprodu= ced on a recent Emacs trunk.

Paul
--001a113fbcc4b3506b050a5208af-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 16 10:39:56 2014 Received: (at 19392) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Dec 2014 15:39:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48005 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y0uE8-00049J-2l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 10:39:56 -0500 Received: from mtaout27.012.net.il ([80.179.55.183]:54595) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y0uE4-000497-Um for 19392@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 10:39:53 -0500 Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout27.012.net.il by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NGO00900LQJKI00@mtaout27.012.net.il> for 19392@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 17:35:50 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NGO00PT0LZQ6G90@mtaout27.012.net.il>; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 17:35:50 +0200 (IST) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 17:39:41 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#19392: Emacs searches for dabbrevs in archive buffers In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Paul Pogonyshev Message-id: <83ppbjwqma.fsf@gnu.org> References: X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 19392 Cc: 19392@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) > Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 10:32:13 +0100 > From: Paul Pogonyshev > > * In a freshly started Emacs, open an archive, e.g. a .tar.gz file in a buffer. > * Switch to another buffer, type a couple of letters and then start pressing > 'M-/' (dabbrev-expand). > * It is very likely you will hit a "very useful" dabbrev in binary form taken > from the archive. E.g. I opened a large tarball, then switched to *scratch*, > typed "tz", and the very first dabbrev I got was "tz\327r". > > Request: Emacs should ignore archive and other binary buffers when generating > dabbrevs. What is the definition of "archive" for this purpose? Also, when you visit a .tar.gz file, isn't most of the buffer readable text (because Emacs automatically decompresses the archive)? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 16 11:19:11 2014 Received: (at 19392) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Dec 2014 16:19:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48027 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y0uq6-000568-HQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 11:19:10 -0500 Received: from mail-ie0-f173.google.com ([209.85.223.173]:58826) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y0uq3-00055y-Uw for 19392@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 11:19:08 -0500 Received: by mail-ie0-f173.google.com with SMTP id y20so13170712ier.18 for <19392@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 08:19:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=KyztjqMdKctodnr4hAwllJ8eS8kIqjgOG0qz99jW8IA=; b=gr0A44MsSBPTko8Nj3oIWrwtofK4JYsHty603mpOSpMXoXhX30xQLCUlNWXUfOKm5A bye3odDbjgyGgtUGB6joDCbTr4RlNtAV+yXmY5gpESDSNTxjSjj87E5+zz3o142j4nRx qJE4LM8fmqV1ZYNSb0kv89MTLBhmkS3Zeh6xYipjhEcLr6677OpfhC/UywIJDiqp8zFV 9uW4YBMFYRlEO2BQSezQP8mKlpnpsr/SDFUqwzWlf9TosLe8cvCl+a7OmVIvUY5fNiza sA2n14xzfY36SyzJS/4BUg4GHcjHP/zaIVHa2CBmQQaN5Y5dxOexmoP6W528U1Nw20gV qzxw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.128.138 with SMTP id k10mr35323648ioi.69.1418746747068; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 08:19:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.43.125.2 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 08:19:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83ppbjwqma.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83ppbjwqma.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 17:19:06 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#19392: Emacs searches for dabbrevs in archive buffers From: Paul Pogonyshev To: Eli Zaretskii Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113fbcc4e2a8fb050a57b7fe X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 19392 Cc: 19392@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --001a113fbcc4e2a8fb050a57b7fe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > What is the definition of "archive" for this purpose? I would say any buffer that has certain major mode, e.g. 'archive-mode' or 'tar-mode'. > Also, when you visit a .tar.gz file, isn't most of the buffer readable > text (because Emacs automatically decompresses the archive)?=E2=80=8B Yes, it appears readable, but dabbrev still comes with various "useful" binary data. Perhaps another approach would be to not search for abbrevs in hidden text, but I don't know how that is implemented internally and if it would be easy enough. Paul --001a113fbcc4e2a8fb050a57b7fe Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> What is the definition of "archive" fo= r this purpose?

I would say any buffer that has certain major = mode, e.g. 'archive-mode' or 'tar-mode'.

> Also, when you visit a .tar.gz file, isn't most of the buffer = readable
> text (because Emacs automatically decompresses the archive= )?=E2=80=8B

Yes, it appears readable, but dabbrev still c= omes with various "useful" binary data. Perhaps another approach = would be to not search for abbrevs in hidden text, but I don't know how= that is implemented internally and if it would be easy enough.

Paul
--001a113fbcc4e2a8fb050a57b7fe-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jul 13 14:09:27 2021 Received: (at 19392) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jul 2021 18:09:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41921 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m3MqV-0006R3-6Q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 14:09:27 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:33570) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m3MqT-0006Qk-Ke for 19392@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 14:09:26 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=FQBoq55XCv2IaGUjNqdr7CADnxfPBbkwwa7ntSEJ8TQ=; b=V6qobitFeE3PiprczOU/oFxm3n bW7ooJ3zHHQyUpofMwYcEusSf489BbHV/qZYV10aBHOXmaokUyCsjM0Uql4tLmcBzXL7oKx5dK5CC tkDu4Js68ZMHMh2/R1rqUz6eqq9EFo4+xvx+JBJm1xSpYkhLgsjRYTMRUa/mL6Vza8C4=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m3MqL-00034c-7t; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 20:09:19 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Paul Pogonyshev Subject: Re: bug#19392: Emacs searches for dabbrevs in archive buffers References: X-Now-Playing: SOPHIE's _OIL OF EVERY PEARL'S UN-INSIDES_: "Ponyboy" Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 20:09:16 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Paul Pogonyshev's message of "Tue, 16 Dec 2014 10:32:13 +0100") Message-ID: <871r82qe5v.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Paul Pogonyshev writes: > * In a freshly started Emacs, open an archive, e.g. a .tar.gz file in a buffer. > * Switch to another buffer, type a couple of letters and then start pressing 'M-/' > (dabbrev-expand). > * It is ver [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 19392 Cc: 19392@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Paul Pogonyshev writes: > * In a freshly started Emacs, open an archive, e.g. a .tar.gz file in a buffer. > * Switch to another buffer, type a couple of letters and then start pressing 'M-/' > (dabbrev-expand). > * It is very likely you will hit a "very useful" dabbrev in binary form taken from > the archive. E.g. I opened a large tarball, then switched to *scratch*, typed "tz", > and the very first dabbrev I got was "tz\327r". (I'm going through old bug reports that unfortunately got little response at the time.) I tried reproducing this in Emacs 28, and I don't get any of these binary expansions. Are you still seeing this in more recent Emacs versions? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jul 13 14:09:33 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jul 2021 18:09:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41924 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m3Mqb-0006RO-DH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 14:09:33 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:33584) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m3MqZ-0006Qx-9T for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 14:09:31 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=KmBngAfmeNSSFt7XIfqBoRSWPOgr7I2bUXU4R/qhSfo=; b=bpuipj8RNu7mqNO2vd1lRvVKQu 6ygXCCZuTKe562edXCTXArrgEMA/NtBOWJlGzTB1OvkqM6Gm+m5dQOcL1+KDnL3EPwtDDXQLY012d Lo1GC9GCsbRrdkiFkjxB0R5Nseq0mTgmQ0yKSmMyPyPWhdSK6dDcTbWNwCnWtz64k0tM=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m3MqR-00034p-L4 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 20:09:25 +0200 Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 20:09:23 +0200 Message-Id: <87zguqozl8.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #19392 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 19392 + moreinfo quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) tags 19392 + moreinfo quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jul 13 14:25:21 2021 Received: (at 19392) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jul 2021 18:25:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41995 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m3N5p-0000iq-Qd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 14:25:21 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-f49.google.com ([209.85.218.49]:38745) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m3N5o-0000iY-99 for 19392@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 14:25:16 -0400 Received: by mail-ej1-f49.google.com with SMTP id gb6so43193401ejc.5 for <19392@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 11:25:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=NbntctXIG50Oi9Tz2nRrQTKsKqULrnoeSoHZn9JgSs8=; b=aIloRYGGqwNn6IPsIHJRljhUQOl6H/OsEwrQ8vC7VSOnpw7a9siBAKY8aLMsNFTid6 jWA38HCSUmxXh7QqpevlD/mdp2RxQlUSUl95b4vhS2i7TeqEM+Sbrv4GouivXgRKhRRH sstQlkwT+mWPuViQu6nK+B5fqTiW/APie/rbxJYebVZ15LyjoXoGy0cjy8rUC+oB0AP4 oa7fvepYE8qZTbKapWw507LxOC1mUu1F6GoplQooH1SFVG9iA3WbMJPiYiwGVyq65aAS q/U4VGQKm+AFL1Gp2OA6Lq5l4CVRA0YTVhKdu/K5j079AYleJUTy/LljMEbmze9+EDu9 d99Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=NbntctXIG50Oi9Tz2nRrQTKsKqULrnoeSoHZn9JgSs8=; b=rxhEuFNRPty9eyMB6yJ+CA/rGaabfJaAzEUaIxkY0L8KVftc7sU/bfEuhIMkVwVnZ1 CXMs+oD4sKH6xjvWWQS0x11PepUWNqBzI2iQRKKOZWMZ9dPEbActeQ5bg/vVrVvxDE7n 3PkA+1QhQcwebHh1RgOHJtV0DIE1PyMNbKOF1kUBlhPCCxq15jRP8IbWSMcystOdD1x6 gN8q6pJknUyxGot8qk8L6xYI+8AYDcMP27ftINfvR62TXv6Ioq9udXVziw0vYXtqDluW tz6BpqRhToEJ5KuIiMIyFL1FcrncUY2a+3yCvN4zEMzjWxJByVWEVkbOLwR3wMj5MraX DKLQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531tu1DHJ4hliu9hs63fRKPDXKB5UlweWxVMMFHxETl4UeWBnKsj y2v9fgTz64InTavwn0YMQ2H0o62e7KVNbjwBKw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwTpOM/UnXBi7XTpzl60R3Q884LFVsspqCw4rHvpKDtK9qIrLqPA4CrHprYYcp6fe2sOPCBJtR7xNzMkJaN+Ko= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:5fc1:: with SMTP id k1mr7166884ejv.360.1626200710177; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 11:25:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <871r82qe5v.fsf@gnus.org> In-Reply-To: <871r82qe5v.fsf@gnus.org> From: Paul Pogonyshev Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 20:24:59 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#19392: Emacs searches for dabbrevs in archive buffers To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ab1bb005c7055b0f" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 19392 Cc: 19392@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --000000000000ab1bb005c7055b0f Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Apparently not from tarballs anymore, but still e.g. from a `.zip' archive. Though I have Emacs 27.1 here, not 28. Paul On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 at 20:09, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Paul Pogonyshev writes: > > > * In a freshly started Emacs, open an archive, e.g. a .tar.gz file in a > buffer. > > * Switch to another buffer, type a couple of letters and then start > pressing 'M-/' > > (dabbrev-expand). > > * It is very likely you will hit a "very useful" dabbrev in binary form > taken from > > the archive. E.g. I opened a large tarball, then switched to *scratch*, > typed "tz", > > and the very first dabbrev I got was "tz\327r". > > (I'm going through old bug reports that unfortunately got little response > at > the time.) > > I tried reproducing this in Emacs 28, and I don't get any of these > binary expansions. Are you still seeing this in more recent Emacs > versions? > > -- > (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) > bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no > --000000000000ab1bb005c7055b0f Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Apparently not from tarballs anymore, but still e.g. from = a `.zip' archive. Though I have Emacs 27.1 here, not 28.

=
Paul

On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 at 20:09, Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> wrote:
Paul Pogonyshev <pogonyshev@gmail.com> wr= ites:

> * In a freshly started Emacs, open an archive, e.g. a .tar.gz file in = a buffer.
> * Switch to another buffer, type a couple of letters and then start pr= essing 'M-/'
> (dabbrev-expand).
> * It is very likely you will hit a "very useful" dabbrev in = binary form taken from
> the archive. E.g. I opened a large tarball, then switched to *scratch*= , typed "tz",
> and the very first dabbrev I got was "tz\327r".

(I'm going through old bug reports that unfortunately got little respon= se at
the time.)

I tried reproducing this in Emacs 28, and I don't get any of these
binary expansions.=C2=A0 Are you still seeing this in more recent Emacs
versions?

--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
=C2=A0 =C2=A0bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
--000000000000ab1bb005c7055b0f-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jul 13 15:14:08 2021 Received: (at 19392) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jul 2021 19:14:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42050 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m3Nr6-00047z-7l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 15:14:08 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:34236) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m3Nr4-00047P-59 for 19392@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 15:14:07 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=wwB7s9xvWFcjM5fmRREOOOsOGgoz2xnwJYt1MaQJshE=; b=HS/koHEJKUmBJkbF26BggFMdVe C75i++DT5m8o8ACOgOcAvJwUzQAuZ4hRDxoTcAQMLWRqJ3EGGr1jTVlODGC64KgjoxciYFbOrdo6h zqZAKeLRMPUr8ULToN2ydIAoUlyX1+VJP5vEUIGOue6YfMgsSKXj5MihQrf26IL1XEbU=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m3Nqw-0003gP-0R; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 21:14:00 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Paul Pogonyshev Subject: Re: bug#19392: Emacs searches for dabbrevs in archive buffers References: <871r82qe5v.fsf@gnus.org> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwAgMAAAAqbBEUAAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAACVBMVEUpIRC+rE3///8D 5IVeAAAAAWJLR0QCZgt8ZAAAAAlwSFlzAAALEgAACxIB0t1+/AAAAAd0SU1FB+UHDRMEImV7vZUA AAC3SURBVCjPlZJBDgMhCEUhkf0syn0k6eydxH//q1TRUZpJF2VheH6FT5Tod7CIKR2JmP4Nzm0Z FxUXytxlBRS15wIDyovgOTJQFe0WwwELzqigg5eaQBsybVg+cPd2ePjMHNRK40Cv2kp7wdvOApvW nspvsCIbaDj3lubHrtG2geIs6TakeEM8O5ofSbBbackVp/iaq+40cYAax/dR04KygA9/nAklQg4w YoNY+CQyXkItb6CuV6EPMAY6nV361zgAAABaZVhJZk1NACoAAAAIAAUBEgADAAAAAQABAAABGgAF AAAAAQAAAEoBGwAFAAAAAQAAAFIBKAADAAAAAQACAAACEwADAAAAAQABAAAAAAAAAAAASAAAAAEA AABIAAAAAR9S9zQAAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6Y3JlYXRlADIwMjEtMDctMTNUMTk6MDQ6MzMrMDA6MDBT 8qBSAAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOm1vZGlmeQAyMDIxLTA3LTEzVDE5OjA0OjMzKzAwOjAwIq8Y7gAAABd0 RVh0ZXhpZjpZQ2JDclBvc2l0aW9uaW5nADGsD4BjAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Now-Playing: Steven Brown's _Live in Tilburg_: "Awakenings" Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 21:13:57 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Paul Pogonyshev's message of "Tue, 13 Jul 2021 20:24:59 +0200") Message-ID: <878s2aowlm.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Paul Pogonyshev writes: > Apparently not from tarballs anymore, but still e.g. from a `.zip' > archive. Though I have Emacs 27.1 here, not 28. I tried visiting a zip file here now (in Emacs 27.1), but I was unable to make dabbrev-expand expand to any of the strings in the raw zip file. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 19392 Cc: 19392@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Paul Pogonyshev writes: > Apparently not from tarballs anymore, but still e.g. from a `.zip' > archive. Though I have Emacs 27.1 here, not 28. I tried visiting a zip file here now (in Emacs 27.1), but I was unable to make dabbrev-expand expand to any of the strings in the raw zip file. Do you have a recipe, starting from "emacs -Q", to reproduce the bug? (Including a test zip file, I guess.) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jul 13 17:12:47 2021 Received: (at 19392) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jul 2021 21:12:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42210 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m3Phv-00013y-3F for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 17:12:47 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-f53.google.com ([209.85.208.53]:40837) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m3Phs-00013j-9q for 19392@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 17:12:45 -0400 Received: by mail-ed1-f53.google.com with SMTP id t3so81212edc.7 for <19392@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 14:12:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=H3OqLgnp8G+bs5lWLSqj/XBOuaMm88U1f4PHUsY/MR8=; b=r3IHof1Je/kwiCVSeAtYJ+Iu/K52BDXrwPcehlAxyqZEo2Bd120VNprJpZyG9WNHqk 72dcn16glJHx9QNrlVMS/aim0MlWTqMvVJfP05fTlytwS6pMWADpj+tIvFCk8Vph5B0g QEM7XJcDEKUQadytJO3zFGYWTRFzBrh34ehVgSKnXTC4OaZfyj7JIwvrGYNlp8DNjyme oK5v0BrFEE+nolDt3wD80Zppyd9RANphCJtcOCzCDTvI1ODOLkxIAAHXhmJ9APCuvV+I 7dlgXjONP6eg8M2ou9errHEVep+RpIjA1JazYGnX51iyUXw6ThbMWqYXnasKLUK3Jyyr HJeQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=H3OqLgnp8G+bs5lWLSqj/XBOuaMm88U1f4PHUsY/MR8=; b=ZRHmUILb9xpGIyNePRZp2I+mO+4QZQthHa8JifJxklYt1xSprCeBDCc6hy6ZSbC/pJ GFr9TOpbdbSIrAFTBnI5ZB8NXMCT64wGnHNxUlB/sPVDw1ALCJfAbQ36OZhpg4ObG+rz USI1fSZ9FQP88tWJz00rVaW4jrHxcuVJPbUeWj8zbgQfQYpj/G1F8Tm5NTFjG0GPNBin SMtKV6mkkORtzQ06KAUZEPNcioIDD85WRiRBtin3XM3lNHdA+gJ71DNP0m7pg7+ubVgf izq4rzSQNwKJK0UrS1/tgyWY1E0o+YXEF77CoGy8W8EtkWL64lgAVNn6+WMBtev2Y1Iu rYEw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531MKKRTnifgJ4CPK02S/NsBHaTZ79OEugqACbwpCaXgC49vqW09 FyFP49DRW97wUgRXjGlPSMJXG1PIYyfkQzRrJA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxdLb4bJppRvB3IPou3FjlQTLtGiR0fHMGCycakHVs0K7Qa8aiTasMWtIyowql/12JW2hhDisrTTKhK9gSswaY= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:cb03:: with SMTP id s3mr8376560edt.189.1626210758475; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 14:12:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <871r82qe5v.fsf@gnus.org> <878s2aowlm.fsf@gnus.org> In-Reply-To: <878s2aowlm.fsf@gnus.org> From: Paul Pogonyshev Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 23:12:27 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#19392: Emacs searches for dabbrevs in archive buffers To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="00000000000096fb1a05c707b215" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 19392 Cc: 19392@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --00000000000096fb1a05c707b215 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000096fb1705c707b213" --00000000000096fb1705c707b213 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" $ emacs -Q random.zip 1. Switch to buffer "*scratch*" 2. Type "P" (without quotes) 3. Press M-/ 4. Here it finds expansion "PK" from buffer "random.zip". Cycling with M-/ finds a few more, which are more binary-like. On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 at 21:14, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Paul Pogonyshev writes: > > > Apparently not from tarballs anymore, but still e.g. from a `.zip' > > archive. Though I have Emacs 27.1 here, not 28. > > I tried visiting a zip file here now (in Emacs 27.1), but I was unable > to make dabbrev-expand expand to any of the strings in the raw zip file. > > Do you have a recipe, starting from "emacs -Q", to reproduce the bug? > (Including a test zip file, I guess.) > > -- > (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) > bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no > --00000000000096fb1705c707b213 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
$ emacs -Q random.zip
<= span style=3D"font-family:monospace">
<= /span>
1. Switch to buffer "*scratch*"
2. Typ= e "P" (without quotes)
3. Press M-/
4. Here it finds expans= ion "PK" from buffer "random.zip".=C2=A0 Cycling
=C2= =A0 =C2=A0with M-/ finds a few more, which are more binary-like.
<= /div>
O= n Tue, 13 Jul 2021 at 21:14, Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> wrote:
Paul Pogonyshev <pogonyshev@gmail.com> w= rites:

> Apparently not from tarballs anymore, but still e.g. from a `.zip'=
> archive. Though I have Emacs 27.1 here, not 28.

I tried visiting a zip file here now (in Emacs 27.1), but I was unable
to make dabbrev-expand expand to any of the strings in the raw zip file.
Do you have a recipe, starting from "emacs -Q", to reproduce the = bug?
(Including a test zip file, I guess.)

--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
=C2=A0 =C2=A0bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
--00000000000096fb1705c707b213-- --00000000000096fb1a05c707b215 Content-Type: application/zip; name="random.zip" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="random.zip" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-ID: X-Attachment-Id: f_kr2js78f0 UEsDBAoAAAAAAMy47VL+2WUU6AMAAOgDAAAKABwAcmFuZG9tLmJpblVUCQADUADuYFUA7mB1eAsA AQToAwAABOgDAAD1jQ0U5kOAl9Zqug+seCM7GzazObmvmnE+YvFw9ts7T3libXGuSKa56+FYW72L KYkQm2UnM4K57ZjGnW3VGRMt4ztMc/X24gPnQIr6cgUgifB4WLSxBhjokTLlVXb06rrDBMiQ2Hoo Ypl2Vv/VkcC7WLO+yUkHMjyeNejBr/aXWTHAUwDD/W8nuRYeSMKOK1bQnmNBcAVGCo/GeMf3yqtl c/qsQV3zuaD2xg5SNPfD8H7wlL7cs6n0YHeMtl7LdylcaQ2LpVxMetifmlUci8vqAYVLY1SF+IOx Z5Ewj6k9BYJAwAoamw09yPTph2bH1vAceDsxMJ+V3AcD5VN0ppa298eQe8wG2C08L27q3h2DYkFD ShH6kipBjSESq5PMyzwqPvYpsNYpMAllUx9Q09UtyWVjpmMbw9baFgBocfdFY99llWtrCvqnLGnk 7VMcB53Ynp3jXwy/5VXhyhnMeb3p81VVx5x7DQt0j6oTRB1xPndNmFKK4hbpZZ9Rq6/WD6zWz4Vh Hipmh9CiCxIhZX9c/1VAjHtVIpzCveKryFCqLZ5RqkjIGgZF2HLqwHjrMhmuCu7zE7+6AUMjVSj5 cMrwnjwtfyTwXN0Qiq+Dr+LVDjb1AIUoFw2ay05DFte3ekIPpMWBp32Rssa8wzdiRikKKFjfHxX+ 6BCG5+8eaAKZtHjlQr7XIs5UU/Kr7z5QgZ/FQ8MOiSHkgdoZ+1t8KwzCBp7jfM7qdCL+5dhXGtlJ BwJ5jXlHW3xfgSzBD2HOW5bU3tv/lCJiJC0sTkDMNfpYKvHRlJLfmTzpPXmiW8BAsjT4jTxx3Kpa 0Ts8x6nD7/1DXbR1IaHbO3JDFCBGZ8DI/xPewD2w3pSpIj41lQxurqA+mp9Rp4stY1csVy5d7sLV WZJvwbQb91DtBxqFLAFwK+KdtaXs1UB2tbko3rRjX0jZrmUZKEbuJyGiqHok4Bm1A9HskYUA+2j0 5YWGKcLxvYMnSDHMcZalj4dTAoLT+ag6Srp60Aef2GnPTVE6pR2KbN3HD1VBUzakFBWbwI9krZpC G9xu1w10fq+efxt8JWCpHR0llPavH1xr51JSUaGqCYo7X828eH051OgBdlGAq5f8Z/eV1+COHn41 i2PE6LwgfD6NEUuQ6Es2gsYwU8qPoXfEuv+7IZJ9sIax41eu7AAxqMwmiThz85CyN7AOzNThwAIy 7KvRaff0P1fzuD9TFVr2Zrs81vSZZY+Uw1VrqWBDdjOhh1dv4GdpwXepzTQvEjo8YF9H4FnDb7Kk 8t2T0jbSDF8Mp7s+4f7otWU5vNaPTpVHzzB1bSxoB20raDhdCj1SfPnvUEsBAh4DCgAAAAAAzLjt Uv7ZZRToAwAA6AMAAAoAGAAAAAAAAAAAAKSBAAAAAHJhbmRvbS5iaW5VVAUAA1AA7mB1eAsAAQTo AwAABOgDAABQSwUGAAAAAAEAAQBQAAAALAQAAAAA --00000000000096fb1a05c707b215-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jul 13 17:17:03 2021 Received: (at 19392) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jul 2021 21:17:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42215 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m3Pm2-0001Af-Mf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 17:17:02 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-f53.google.com ([209.85.208.53]:41609) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m3Pm0-0001A7-KO for 19392@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 17:17:01 -0400 Received: by mail-ed1-f53.google.com with SMTP id w14so88806edc.8 for <19392@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 14:17:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=1I67rtH4UhBalyYVYIizKbjFuN9d/WTNC8mUiPeWxME=; b=LQHBCBE0uLuwRwjJdojAPraDS97W9ngFGZs5kG5maS1NfC+iZYmgH87IbI1E3c8chV AvE6Vic7UrirX0MgK9SeU894rrNc8hzehQEtLcw4yq+hyQ+eBjzOD30Bd9Je7ZbdSNHs hNbYxBcuuLv+1Y5l9xt8/2ZgqOvE3gtJg2Q3r/dC25LkKK0/3hI8Ht4S+Ad++ZofLSum ukc/RIVXWFrJy390PnmEnnIrslburbxAPQCvSw0qh8ZShAnupejXeZJ/ubI1z/yvybnl EDraPskrYHU7tzu4/gIpJ5ckodkHUcbUfoGZBBN3vdpVEa7XJRvqWl9OVct0z/nVAqij zWhw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1I67rtH4UhBalyYVYIizKbjFuN9d/WTNC8mUiPeWxME=; b=AkDgCaBI2NzoB4LOjmH0b7azJmAkJtoaN7HOeezD5BLEbn8J63BgcMfsrdaFDjwUb5 /Nwz3Yyr0RZ2ZVaB0KX7HLkA3SLLi2vdbxheTnDO7pnlGTd5sRXHnr+WIeQthkchanvn MO6odcRPCryMyhJwwOf5MDCFu3jtQqXUxVZs194uJfTj9IIjPkv7JZge/ksNLeTxJ8Ca RnCJ9keNWvrJyVCcRg7s9GL+7+c6rcvbfc4lFdXoCk5ElLE5kLaCUrUzHBUBgCNzN5WQ sIhvQ4IWksWc200xTXSFLqydbvyZjBDlZgliD96IWM77vPh9QG81K8LJBN6XYmD1RRln JuDQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533h5RnXuUPUsLclPtDhxpOG/1Bi1AlFcIkjL79qisQr5qbC0mAL hJN5SISxWUZM0ND79A76rQw7ThQtvcnAdrsbGQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx1xmp/xaI1CxSr+OWqGe0KVsv5eG7iy6eIrvWfski/3bTJy26nt7M/EvZ8Z60zxkYwi/QX9Vdod4sx8Dr8znA= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:48f:: with SMTP id k15mr8370578edv.262.1626211015126; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 14:16:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <871r82qe5v.fsf@gnus.org> <878s2aowlm.fsf@gnus.org> In-Reply-To: From: Paul Pogonyshev Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 23:16:44 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#19392: Emacs searches for dabbrevs in archive buffers To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e2f06605c707c1af" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 19392 Cc: 19392@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --000000000000e2f06605c707c1af Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Zipping binary data was not a good idea, but at least string "PK" doesn't come from the archived "random.bin". You can create another test `.zip' file by archiving a text file, to be sure. Paul On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 at 23:12, Paul Pogonyshev wrote: > $ emacs -Q random.zip > > 1. Switch to buffer "*scratch*" > 2. Type "P" (without quotes) > 3. Press M-/ > 4. Here it finds expansion "PK" from buffer "random.zip". Cycling > with M-/ finds a few more, which are more binary-like. > > On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 at 21:14, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > >> Paul Pogonyshev writes: >> >> > Apparently not from tarballs anymore, but still e.g. from a `.zip' >> > archive. Though I have Emacs 27.1 here, not 28. >> >> I tried visiting a zip file here now (in Emacs 27.1), but I was unable >> to make dabbrev-expand expand to any of the strings in the raw zip file. >> >> Do you have a recipe, starting from "emacs -Q", to reproduce the bug? >> (Including a test zip file, I guess.) >> >> -- >> (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) >> bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no >> > --000000000000e2f06605c707c1af Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Zipping binary data was not a good idea, but at least stri= ng "PK" doesn't come from the archived "random.bin"= . You can create another test `.zip' file by archiving a text file, to = be sure.

Paul

=
On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 at 23:12, Paul Po= gonyshev <pogonyshev@gmail.com> wrote:
$ emacs -Q random.zip

1. Switch to buffer "*scratch*"
2. Type = "P" (without quotes)
3. Press M-/
4. Here it finds expansio= n "PK" from buffer "random.zip".=C2=A0 Cycling
=C2= =A0 =C2=A0with M-/ finds a few more, which are more binary-like.
<= /div>
O= n Tue, 13 Jul 2021 at 21:14, Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> wrote:
Paul Pogonyshev <pogonyshev@gmail.com> w= rites:

> Apparently not from tarballs anymore, but still e.g. from a `.zip'=
> archive. Though I have Emacs 27.1 here, not 28.

I tried visiting a zip file here now (in Emacs 27.1), but I was unable
to make dabbrev-expand expand to any of the strings in the raw zip file.
Do you have a recipe, starting from "emacs -Q", to reproduce the = bug?
(Including a test zip file, I guess.)

--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
=C2=A0 =C2=A0bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
--000000000000e2f06605c707c1af-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jul 14 08:43:48 2021 Received: (at 19392) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Jul 2021 12:43:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43293 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m3eEu-0005x4-KJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 08:43:48 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47904) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m3eEt-0005wo-4R for 19392@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 08:43:47 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:38216) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m3eEn-0005Nt-FZ; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 08:43:41 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1570 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m3eEn-0004ln-2G; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 08:43:41 -0400 Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 15:43:37 +0300 Message-Id: <83czrl83ra.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Paul Pogonyshev In-Reply-To: (message from Paul Pogonyshev on Tue, 13 Jul 2021 23:16:44 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#19392: Emacs searches for dabbrevs in archive buffers References: <871r82qe5v.fsf@gnus.org> <878s2aowlm.fsf@gnus.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 19392 Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 19392@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Paul Pogonyshev > Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 23:16:44 +0200 > Cc: 19392@debbugs.gnu.org > > Zipping binary data was not a good idea, but at least string "PK" doesn't come from the archived > "random.bin". You can create another test `.zip' file by archiving a text file, to be sure. FWIW, I don't see a bug here. Why should we assume that "binary" buffers could never have anything useful for M-/ ? Note that Emacs only searches other buffers if it cannot find matches in the current one, or exhausts the ones from the current buffer. And we already support dabbrev-select-buffers-function, dabbrev-ignored-buffer-names, and dabbrev-ignored-buffer-regexps, which could fine-tune which other buffers are searched. So it sounds like users who want to control which other buffers are searched have more than enough knobs to have whatever behavior they want. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jul 14 12:16:10 2021 Received: (at 19392) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Jul 2021 16:16:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45805 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m3hYQ-0003nt-JW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 12:16:10 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:45578) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m3hYO-0003hJ-8n for 19392@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 12:16:08 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=cpXvBhlKX8G2aerjBSFIleRK9Vgow+Ra/NsSZdJRqvA=; b=eot9RGgHkBIV69iDGgC0J54/95 fuyosUxSQUI5MJ93uyZZtgIohIiwgVYf8Ya7J7XgKUS6BUwdx8bwOQqY5Tp71WsscCuCbFoczSaAq L2TnwsQOb5cwECRTwpNe2bsZQaqbKHcHjYQpW6S2f7nsevq0Hs+lpl8fDHAzUb/QlsO8=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m3hYF-0005Yk-Ek; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 18:16:01 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Paul Pogonyshev Subject: Re: bug#19392: Emacs searches for dabbrevs in archive buffers References: <871r82qe5v.fsf@gnus.org> <878s2aowlm.fsf@gnus.org> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAD1BMVEXAvcTBlz+0Uy1l Uzn////h+kdSAAAAAWJLR0QEj2jZUQAAAAd0SU1FB+UHDhAALhhSJQ0AAAG7SURBVDjLhZSNsewg CIWJNiDaQMQGAvTf2z2o2WTfz1xmxzV8cADjhOh/xtP+4ShfYeXZFOmpJ0mpCFah85CjnBPUFFZT LWfq1BP3c4I+/YgmOpMfPZVTAgyJFAKIaDEJEDWaCJ4cPxnDFqgPMCwGgADjM91gmkXGiF2/MyLB kOOQChui3Gj4Y7FHkpsrU9tOCZWdIq7IyDn8NiWGPKBY+LOhMETEXoDyzhDxnfNkbCl/1djFN5Bf gOiag1e7HlL2Bl+mCGsPqFvRjXtQgNWVLEUbAV0N4NHil15kRF/kjf0OGT7uAQvNOrSB8T3HRYce +6ijCqPGbCcuIFWeLZq5BJAI4YtqEeZ1DNK5hxTAoIz+FxhuvcquYdys9JWAOIRUKs14xQ1pinac RxDi7Fwy3CGk3IczJkKH+OOCErXwMX1Y7AE0QeNQZZbRFwiVcSnXHlNxFegSzoirZpcL8foNUDSz eICY6QFLF0tZR15HFF/gCKBrcsW1eIGuTee2+Znkc6kLI/zSNt/+le5XMG+GOk+AgHT0GxxTROcJ ylXj0/ABFUDmAw77Bp71z1u3vyl/GV7t62ldaGw6+w8N1JDo7S6oAAAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTpjcmVh dGUAMjAyMS0wNy0xNFQxNjowMDo0NSswMDowMOmFEUsAAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6bW9kaWZ5ADIwMjEt MDctMTRUMTY6MDA6NDUrMDA6MDCY2Kn3AAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Now-Playing: C. Marshall's _Rocksteady Got Soul_: "I Need Your Loving" Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 18:15:58 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Paul Pogonyshev's message of "Tue, 13 Jul 2021 23:12:27 +0200") Message-ID: <87v95cdg75.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Paul Pogonyshev writes: > $ emacs -Q random.zip > > 1. Switch to buffer "*scratch*" > 2. Type "P" (without quotes) > 3. Press M-/ > 4. Here it finds expansion "PK" from buffer "random.zip". Cycling > with M-/ finds a few mor [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 19392 Cc: 19392@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Paul Pogonyshev writes: > $ emacs -Q random.zip > > 1. Switch to buffer "*scratch*" > 2. Type "P" (without quotes) > 3. Press M-/ > 4. Here it finds expansion "PK" from buffer "random.zip". Cycling > with M-/ finds a few more, which are more binary-like. Thanks; with that recipe I can reproduce the behaviour. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jul 14 12:19:12 2021 Received: (at 19392) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Jul 2021 16:19:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45810 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m3hbM-000523-5X for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 12:19:12 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:45598) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m3hbK-00051r-FB for 19392@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 12:19:11 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=8f8aLogI1CZpdegqUS7TSMRUSB1jOXnppZ61e90UpSA=; b=aBMEENKLfENZHoTbPHmUHwo0Lx 51+Lc8Cj4rd09kss49B9/LppPRXGT2xJl/pJJdsCKXfWOWyP2V/ftrWxMGazcqetXCn9GNWakHV+6 bmL/MwOGI153u0mbR+ueRzPgz2fuyVyC7wQUzT7MpFyg7czS6X8oVztN7k/MZ+bM82i8=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m3hbB-0005ab-Tt; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 18:19:04 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#19392: Emacs searches for dabbrevs in archive buffers References: <871r82qe5v.fsf@gnus.org> <878s2aowlm.fsf@gnus.org> <83czrl83ra.fsf@gnu.org> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAD1BMVEXAvcTBlz+0Uy1l Uzn////h+kdSAAAAAWJLR0QEj2jZUQAAAAd0SU1FB+UHDhAALhhSJQ0AAAG7SURBVDjLhZSNsewg CIWJNiDaQMQGAvTf2z2o2WTfz1xmxzV8cADjhOh/xtP+4ShfYeXZFOmpJ0mpCFah85CjnBPUFFZT LWfq1BP3c4I+/YgmOpMfPZVTAgyJFAKIaDEJEDWaCJ4cPxnDFqgPMCwGgADjM91gmkXGiF2/MyLB kOOQChui3Gj4Y7FHkpsrU9tOCZWdIq7IyDn8NiWGPKBY+LOhMETEXoDyzhDxnfNkbCl/1djFN5Bf gOiag1e7HlL2Bl+mCGsPqFvRjXtQgNWVLEUbAV0N4NHil15kRF/kjf0OGT7uAQvNOrSB8T3HRYce +6ijCqPGbCcuIFWeLZq5BJAI4YtqEeZ1DNK5hxTAoIz+FxhuvcquYdys9JWAOIRUKs14xQ1pinac RxDi7Fwy3CGk3IczJkKH+OOCErXwMX1Y7AE0QeNQZZbRFwiVcSnXHlNxFegSzoirZpcL8foNUDSz eICY6QFLF0tZR15HFF/gCKBrcsW1eIGuTee2+Znkc6kLI/zSNt/+le5XMG+GOk+AgHT0GxxTROcJ ylXj0/ABFUDmAw77Bp71z1u3vyl/GV7t62ldaGw6+w8N1JDo7S6oAAAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTpjcmVh dGUAMjAyMS0wNy0xNFQxNjowMDo0NSswMDowMOmFEUsAAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6bW9kaWZ5ADIwMjEt MDctMTRUMTY6MDA6NDUrMDA6MDCY2Kn3AAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Now-Playing: Alton Ellis's _Rocksteady Got Soul_: "I'll Be Waiting" Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 18:19:01 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83czrl83ra.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 14 Jul 2021 15:43:37 +0300") Message-ID: <87r1g0dg22.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Note that Emacs only searches other buffers if it cannot find matches > in the current one, or exhausts the ones from the current buffer. And > we already support dabbrev-select-buffers-function, > [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 19392 Cc: Paul Pogonyshev , 19392@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Eli Zaretskii writes: > Note that Emacs only searches other buffers if it cannot find matches > in the current one, or exhausts the ones from the current buffer. And > we already support dabbrev-select-buffers-function, > dabbrev-ignored-buffer-names, and dabbrev-ignored-buffer-regexps, > which could fine-tune which other buffers are searched. We do have all of that, but I think that it would be reasonable (by default) for `dabbrev--select-buffers' to ignore these "binary" buffers. Because the data there is mostly noise. I think that could be easily implemented by allowing modes to set a buffer-local variable like `dabbrev-ignore-buffer'. I can see arc/tar mode doing that, and perhaps image-mode, too? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jul 14 13:37:14 2021 Received: (at 19392) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Jul 2021 17:37:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45866 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m3ios-0006zs-2q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 13:37:14 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56554) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m3ioq-0006zc-6y for 19392@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 13:37:12 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:48650) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m3iok-0005FT-KP; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 13:37:06 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3852 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m3ioj-0004Mi-Jw; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 13:37:06 -0400 Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 20:37:03 +0300 Message-Id: <83sg0g7q68.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Lars Ingebrigtsen In-Reply-To: <87r1g0dg22.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Wed, 14 Jul 2021 18:19:01 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#19392: Emacs searches for dabbrevs in archive buffers References: <871r82qe5v.fsf@gnus.org> <878s2aowlm.fsf@gnus.org> <83czrl83ra.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1g0dg22.fsf@gnus.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 19392 Cc: pogonyshev@gmail.com, 19392@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: Paul Pogonyshev , 19392@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 18:19:01 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Note that Emacs only searches other buffers if it cannot find matches > > in the current one, or exhausts the ones from the current buffer. And > > we already support dabbrev-select-buffers-function, > > dabbrev-ignored-buffer-names, and dabbrev-ignored-buffer-regexps, > > which could fine-tune which other buffers are searched. > > We do have all of that, but I think that it would be reasonable (by > default) for `dabbrev--select-buffers' to ignore these "binary" > buffers. Because the data there is mostly noise. If you want to do that, why not just add the appropriate regexp(s) to dabbrev-ignored-buffer-regexps? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jul 15 00:41:15 2021 Received: (at 19392) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Jul 2021 04:41:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46230 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m3tBT-0007vK-3F for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 00:41:15 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:51778) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m3tBR-0007v7-MP for 19392@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 00:41:14 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=b4E1VhZ+RLeqMCWd50LnE5xBd757wezrOqirMEMa7uY=; b=AXYTNmFf0TYXV2RJyf7U9xpchX 0ZV/2qwUi4xfh3xo/8dtieHBvpXpmFIMCn+T+xXw9No+2IUh2fGTVnpVjtuzIzuZIvsvkXWvy4LRf td4PR6ZKWGaQrT7K1OTZiQFR649FAyHln3kHtxhWRXashCMzZtguNBBYRN7ApKEkH0jk=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m3tBI-0003ov-7p; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 06:41:06 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#19392: Emacs searches for dabbrevs in archive buffers References: <871r82qe5v.fsf@gnus.org> <878s2aowlm.fsf@gnus.org> <83czrl83ra.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1g0dg22.fsf@gnus.org> <83sg0g7q68.fsf@gnu.org> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAALVBMVEUFBAsPESopFRpd FB/PKzbVXp1JT0PdtUy7vMOUDhpBiiEhJFk/XKJckM/////cWtUyAAAAAWJLR0QOb70wTwAAAAd0 SU1FB+UHDwQfGlcvs+8AAAFRSURBVDjLY2CAAAEG+gEmYyVlBWwSLKEhoQ7YJFSAEk5YzElgS04z NoByGYGeYAKz2CrawLQgQi0jVKIMrLHcGc0otrQkMFXuiSLcXgGzaoonsjkM7eWwANNENarchQGL hKYlzJEMSgxKSkgeczFggASFiQtKkIAkIFZMmYmQYFJSYALqFgC7QokRoZzTBRQ8TDNBwADZHLCE ANMEJSVNYyQJJSUmMJcJSDApCiAkVq2C2pSAFkIEJTCS0LZEKEMBTWL3bqhRBgw4gLERugh3Nshe prQ0QSAQQIpYnt6LoGi5c/YMEN65i+QIQQFpaRj3zA0U1+09cQDmljM4JBjgcQ0G0jIbEOwbG5D1 MOyIhkl0oAbOjmCYxF1UHfCwYhRCDzWYxG50CcaNG8GUIKbSjbjCkYFRgBG7BYyCikIK2CTE0tLS ErBJCCoJauNwLB0BAObeQfYY7VR9AAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOmNyZWF0ZQAyMDIxLTA3LTE1VDA0OjMx OjI2KzAwOjAwOxnKwgAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTptb2RpZnkAMjAyMS0wNy0xNVQwNDozMToyNiswMDow MEpEcn4AAAAASUVORK5CYII= X-Now-Playing: Squarepusher's _Be Up A Hello_: "Nervelevers" Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 06:41:03 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83sg0g7q68.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 14 Jul 2021 20:37:03 +0300") Message-ID: <875yxcrxy8.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> We do have all of that, but I think that it would be reasonable (by >> default) for `dabbrev--select-buffers' to ignore these "binary" >> buffers. Because the data there is mostly noise. > > If you [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 19392 Cc: pogonyshev@gmail.com, 19392@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Eli Zaretskii writes: >> We do have all of that, but I think that it would be reasonable (by >> default) for `dabbrev--select-buffers' to ignore these "binary" >> buffers. Because the data there is mostly noise. > > If you want to do that, why not just add the appropriate regexp(s) to > dabbrev-ignored-buffer-regexps? It's a user option, so we shouldn't add things to it dynamically, but we could add a default that excludes these files. The problem is, though, that that would be a very complex regexp matching everything that arc/tar/image modes covers, which is quite a lot. The user option thing also goes for `dabbrev-ignored-buffer-names'. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Aug 12 11:06:34 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Aug 2021 15:06:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39662 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mECHx-0004eI-Rw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 11:06:33 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:41858) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mECHv-0004e0-NS for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 11:06:32 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=yv2OTfMUOUvnNq+eKOB0a7HcctKtHt6pIfWkGioW1mU=; b=gOw3DZMAAGhQAnQG6Eh829SjPa fXPiZ+X4SIyIF7eow9QEgigGgUPsvD5eHPY+Kp2zi/WDCv723FaFdY4NtngY4d6aO/mNHpSyJLHm2 ARWJuAu+xCVs8fhE2bDgHw7FQN9fAVpEfvXqU/U8QXTcopFYZlD8pER7nv+4rOOiTlAY=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mECHm-0007Gh-Tm for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 17:06:25 +0200 Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 17:06:22 +0200 Message-Id: <87sfzeitxt.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #19392 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 19392 - moreinfo quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) tags 19392 - moreinfo quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Oct 22 19:43:27 2021 Received: (at 19392) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Oct 2021 23:43:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33969 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1me4C7-0007AQ-AS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Oct 2021 19:43:27 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-f45.google.com ([209.85.216.45]:43527) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1me4C4-0007A6-FK for 19392@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Oct 2021 19:43:25 -0400 Received: by mail-pj1-f45.google.com with SMTP id e5-20020a17090a804500b001a116ad95caso4084296pjw.2 for <19392@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 22 Oct 2021 16:43:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=rspMcwq+JUCdRNHThQAuIx8epYfcsPE21Kz0n99+hO4=; b=hBl10+PjlyF2zFU4n2XIOVkerxZswpqMYc7CaQqHgVD/IDt1KgkjJe0hY5LQgN0gR+ a9MEP6//DCvCrBc7nk++2KozbCFwK4Kn6Yg33msMimDWvJW+qOLoEPgwjFB2b/Tgbxzy 7uBSo3QykkBlMszsE/5bN2VFIOdJ+rskwa3XoFAiaUtfwTPmJhCbw8vpkbSi9dDqBsV4 JxSUOb9sYsITqUSFYbcmDtr9u1z7iUyRdRxJKeleM2/mDXlQ63zDFgW7e52q22hFOsEc JMvB3uOqJe4HDJp/tnjytMIEP1DDpZZJjQJfeGKnFPiP7pduGgm2/aGHBzf39S8p9MBK st1w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533SCkYXko+ZptUssSC9T3hX/DSc0RnwhAI9UV09ERvHZyj9BqUc 7UfImTpcJyDV8jGg37g3StnffAxRxvWl5ehdElv+W7M5 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx+Ifb5tt1P5Ufdz334JaEtA54zEl/Ne/vsWCHLKC2HKt4oWxmu1FKjYTr1y9myLlh4iggs8uPJH/GSFnshh8M= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3b86:: with SMTP id pc6mr772423pjb.143.1634946198906; Fri, 22 Oct 2021 16:43:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Fri, 22 Oct 2021 19:43:18 -0400 From: Stefan Kangas In-Reply-To: <875yxcrxy8.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu, 15 Jul 2021 06:41:03 +0200") References: <871r82qe5v.fsf@gnus.org> <878s2aowlm.fsf@gnus.org> <83czrl83ra.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1g0dg22.fsf@gnus.org> <83sg0g7q68.fsf@gnu.org> <875yxcrxy8.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2021 19:43:18 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#19392: Emacs searches for dabbrevs in archive buffers To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 19392 Cc: Eli Zaretskii , pogonyshev@gmail.com, 19392@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Eli Zaretskii writes: > >>> We do have all of that, but I think that it would be reasonable (by >>> default) for `dabbrev--select-buffers' to ignore these "binary" >>> buffers. Because the data there is mostly noise. >> >> If you want to do that, why not just add the appropriate regexp(s) to >> dabbrev-ignored-buffer-regexps? > > It's a user option, so we shouldn't add things to it dynamically, but we > could add a default that excludes these files. The problem is, though, > that that would be a very complex regexp matching everything that > arc/tar/image modes covers, which is quite a lot. > > The user option thing also goes for `dabbrev-ignored-buffer-names'. Shouldn't we rather have a defcustom to ignore certain major modes? The name could be `dabbrev-ignored-major-modes'. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Oct 23 02:53:44 2021 Received: (at 19392) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Oct 2021 06:53:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34223 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1meAuW-0001Wl-G6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2021 02:53:44 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41628) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1meAuU-0001WY-Op for 19392@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2021 02:53:43 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:53008) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1meAuJ-0006zN-2D; Sat, 23 Oct 2021 02:53:37 -0400 Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3686 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1meAuI-00014D-BS; Sat, 23 Oct 2021 02:53:30 -0400 Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2021 09:53:18 +0300 Message-Id: <83v91o5j1d.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Stefan Kangas In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Kangas on Fri, 22 Oct 2021 19:43:18 -0400) Subject: Re: bug#19392: Emacs searches for dabbrevs in archive buffers References: <871r82qe5v.fsf@gnus.org> <878s2aowlm.fsf@gnus.org> <83czrl83ra.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1g0dg22.fsf@gnus.org> <83sg0g7q68.fsf@gnu.org> <875yxcrxy8.fsf@gnus.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 19392 Cc: larsi@gnus.org, pogonyshev@gmail.com, 19392@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2021 19:43:18 -0400 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , pogonyshev@gmail.com, 19392@debbugs.gnu.org > > Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > >>> We do have all of that, but I think that it would be reasonable (by > >>> default) for `dabbrev--select-buffers' to ignore these "binary" > >>> buffers. Because the data there is mostly noise. > >> > >> If you want to do that, why not just add the appropriate regexp(s) to > >> dabbrev-ignored-buffer-regexps? > > > > It's a user option, so we shouldn't add things to it dynamically, but we > > could add a default that excludes these files. The problem is, though, > > that that would be a very complex regexp matching everything that > > arc/tar/image modes covers, which is quite a lot. > > > > The user option thing also goes for `dabbrev-ignored-buffer-names'. > > Shouldn't we rather have a defcustom to ignore certain major modes? > The name could be `dabbrev-ignored-major-modes'. I don't necessarily object, but don't the existing defcustom's already cover that, via buffer names? We shouldn't over-engineer this, I think. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Oct 23 03:47:55 2021 Received: (at 19392) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Oct 2021 07:47:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34280 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1meBkx-00052s-CB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2021 03:47:55 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-f46.google.com ([209.85.216.46]:54926) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1meBkt-00051w-TE for 19392@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2021 03:47:52 -0400 Received: by mail-pj1-f46.google.com with SMTP id np13so4471462pjb.4 for <19392@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 23 Oct 2021 00:47:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=8fly7+sFRB/USz1w6FK3Re9yp8bkRgF/ymMdsyz1mqk=; b=C60aRMloFrU7qTz/reqSOwCGzs4wbgBgBCVBCNCsGQaqyJr06otyVVpzFyGoGRKJ19 OnwZDoTtauoI+NQHRMVSaWDm0suZvy02NwTp0SAlQTDVEqkVBnDBM1fa3pifRf4ikR0i K/DlG3qdQ4rT5XsIdu6nHT+AHWb7W0yMG+usoKLa+QfeTPzDK0s56G/9aGWeHopnlDaP kPWSy/W2yeRqwoeuhRQ6lgT2dgUHPGLJ9/xwMUdrj9OKynKwwbno2G7Ip+1SMQNucaCT kow1qp7yAEOvmyxxbcJXcjnGC6mHnwz9ikH8eYu/zr971xtuuU0M0xiYoGzB13S8qBtM voug== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530/NVNFo48z9+4eK0PAUPvYD0YA66h/RMlmR9RzpU4gf2u5EKV8 6fr/UtEAPrnKpmSH1z8Er6ejmNJ6rXDgL/x/cG8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyYQ/D7He5A9UgJ7QQlTKvhNixdIpAv5FyuTJ0NrHg5JG2NQ3eAwNYwvCWiPMcTnSd4zgwPAUt+spMwrG7qzK4= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:c7c3:b0:140:2033:662c with SMTP id r3-20020a170902c7c300b001402033662cmr4156314pla.32.1634975266227; Sat, 23 Oct 2021 00:47:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Sat, 23 Oct 2021 00:47:45 -0700 From: Stefan Kangas In-Reply-To: <83v91o5j1d.fsf@gnu.org> References: <871r82qe5v.fsf@gnus.org> <878s2aowlm.fsf@gnus.org> <83czrl83ra.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1g0dg22.fsf@gnus.org> <83sg0g7q68.fsf@gnu.org> <875yxcrxy8.fsf@gnus.org> <83v91o5j1d.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2021 00:47:45 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#19392: Emacs searches for dabbrevs in archive buffers To: Eli Zaretskii Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 19392 Cc: larsi@gnus.org, pogonyshev@gmail.com, 19392@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) Eli Zaretskii writes: >> > It's a user option, so we shouldn't add things to it dynamically, but we >> > could add a default that excludes these files. The problem is, though, >> > that that would be a very complex regexp matching everything that >> > arc/tar/image modes covers, which is quite a lot. >> >> Shouldn't we rather have a defcustom to ignore certain major modes? >> The name could be `dabbrev-ignored-major-modes'. > > I don't necessarily object, but don't the existing defcustom's already > cover that, via buffer names? We shouldn't over-engineer this, I > think. Yes, let's try to avoid over-engineering. This proposal was mostly just an alternative idea that might allow us to avoid adding some hairy and/or brittle regexps. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 24 08:25:16 2021 Received: (at 19392) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Oct 2021 12:25:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38072 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mecYu-00077S-9G for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 08:25:16 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:43446) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mecYs-00077C-H5 for 19392@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 08:25:15 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Hu+o59LGNnVZ5THLLksWDFmrQVAZb/Bye8hU19XkzLY=; b=ljow6ejZQXthsQfE/5KxW0PDO3 6I8vbvEEdcRi3vyQwenpNwyOrECjeZPqUxoHh/Ep2L29ul0kLRIQoBvMpzo7WFfgsWhPFR0tzwglw n4TYFQnGknchVFJDsPYGhb9jpbpVHFqzTY/USUgJbkmE/24CprBLIYXbylN0xcnPK8cs=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mecYi-0006r8-JN; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 14:25:07 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Stefan Kangas Subject: Re: bug#19392: Emacs searches for dabbrevs in archive buffers References: <871r82qe5v.fsf@gnus.org> <878s2aowlm.fsf@gnus.org> <83czrl83ra.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1g0dg22.fsf@gnus.org> <83sg0g7q68.fsf@gnu.org> <875yxcrxy8.fsf@gnus.org> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwCAAAAAByaaZbAAAAAXNSR0IArs4c6QAAAAJiS0dE AP+Hj8y/AAAACXBIWXMAAAsSAAALEgHS3X78AAAAB3RJTUUH5QoYDA8DQsvzUQAAAJhJREFUSMft k9ENgCAMRIGwkqPclF3KUfzBQC3aw/ihwX4R0tdryxHXMBZpMH9OIAeUk3BAXOqZQlqgIXBaQQF7 BjolyKFhLrRCCGKSRPNDa0WnJSgBsV2lXpWrgZyWrETml4R+Sx7Gb6lgiTEQGo3jw7nxwh9344tS UU3MKTSmJxXqQzw/tGgBFzDOcRUwChxjSvP9wEeBDeQcFNLrTcmuAAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOmNyZWF0 ZQAyMDIxLTEwLTI0VDEyOjE1OjAyKzAwOjAwM7W0pAAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTptb2RpZnkAMjAyMS0x MC0yNFQxMjoxNTowMiswMDowMELoDBgAAAA4dEVYdGljYzpjb3B5cmlnaHQAQ29weXJpZ2h0IChj KSAxOTk4IEhld2xldHQtUGFja2FyZCBDb21wYW55+Vd5NwAAACF0RVh0aWNjOmRlc2NyaXB0aW9u AHNSR0IgSUVDNjE5NjYtMi4xV63aRwAAACZ0RVh0aWNjOm1hbnVmYWN0dXJlcgBJRUMgaHR0cDov L3d3dy5pZWMuY2gcfwBMAAAAN3RFWHRpY2M6bW9kZWwASUVDIDYxOTY2LTIuMSBEZWZhdWx0IFJH QiBjb2xvdXIgc3BhY2UgLSBzUkdCRFNIqQAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== X-Now-Playing: Lost Girls's _Menneskekollektivet_: "Love, Lovers" Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2021 14:25:04 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Kangas's message of "Fri, 22 Oct 2021 19:43:18 -0400") Message-ID: <87ee8abof3.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Stefan Kangas writes: > Shouldn't we rather have a defcustom to ignore certain major modes? > The name could be `dabbrev-ignored-major-modes'. Are there a lot of these modes? I'm just wondering whether this would make things easier (in practice) or not. So (off the top of my head), this would be archive-mode, tar-mode, image-mode... Uhm... p [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 19392 Cc: Eli Zaretskii , pogonyshev@gmail.com, 19392@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Stefan Kangas writes: > Shouldn't we rather have a defcustom to ignore certain major modes? > The name could be `dabbrev-ignored-major-modes'. Are there a lot of these modes? I'm just wondering whether this would make things easier (in practice) or not. So (off the top of my head), this would be archive-mode, tar-mode, image-mode... Uhm... perhaps those are the major ones? Then it does sound like a simpler way to customise this, because there's a lot of archive/image file names you'd have to match. So I think adding `dabbrev-ignored-major-modes' sounds like a good idea. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 24 09:07:24 2021 Received: (at 19392) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Oct 2021 13:07:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38157 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1medDg-00048w-3A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 09:07:24 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-f42.google.com ([209.85.216.42]:45992) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1medDe-00048l-Vx for 19392@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 09:07:23 -0400 Received: by mail-pj1-f42.google.com with SMTP id ls14-20020a17090b350e00b001a00e2251c8so6358054pjb.4 for <19392@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 06:07:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Nf5rwrKqCa8wF22lil/jD3rzJ3/fMZcBWxRuPBw7SeQ=; b=AYy1VRcxYJKuBJAlqNRHFE4jEjmkVU1kG4R60+rWwC70xqhX8yrIyzTaYOaWwpbckX 6P4VXItcI/3QAARC90FHFfupWoCIm9sFQs9RLdxM16c/tq9qInnvQ8yxYfhQbQoeIVIc cLfSaxkqZDTx/t91GQiFF7XyzNIIISsQ/ejF/pZj1zkx+PXEIgpwJzWVhZXqiXdhlqff GvJ0XCcbvQ4+joBFxI4Y9Bwuxi6s0WtOMgBapcIU7Khd/a8ASRBWc6QrlavlCEpznaOG VQ33w0JiQdeozsMa/Gdo5jWcz3fd5fqiWE2LLB2E5SL5bmlBIQlYI5JAWDZecipU3urf voZw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533wrUSCs6pWrB/GrLsONHjsmarsUum8hX29OhKPqJ+kGi9GAa0D UWjtX51Y8ByHI0aDFgPl7ogKOVSxj4ndPDEraa8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw06MakFUhpcWQrk4ESY3a+TmkfmZcKfZjaQT3oGRq6w26JThku3gWlX+yM0KXyJLlRXTbHrKZ7EfTCfOlN2F0= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:17d2:: with SMTP id me18mr28102674pjb.132.1635080837326; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 06:07:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 06:07:16 -0700 From: Stefan Kangas In-Reply-To: <87ee8abof3.fsf@gnus.org> References: <871r82qe5v.fsf@gnus.org> <878s2aowlm.fsf@gnus.org> <83czrl83ra.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1g0dg22.fsf@gnus.org> <83sg0g7q68.fsf@gnu.org> <875yxcrxy8.fsf@gnus.org> <87ee8abof3.fsf@gnus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2021 06:07:16 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#19392: Emacs searches for dabbrevs in archive buffers To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 19392 Cc: Eli Zaretskii , pogonyshev@gmail.com, 19392@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Are there a lot of these modes? I'm just wondering whether this would > make things easier (in practice) or not. So (off the top of my head), > this would be archive-mode, tar-mode, image-mode... Uhm... perhaps > those are the major ones? Perhaps `hexl-mode' as well? You could throw in `tetris-mode' and the other ones in play/, I guess. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 24 09:19:59 2021 Received: (at 19392) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Oct 2021 13:19:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38179 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1medPr-0006bA-G4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 09:19:59 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:44042) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1medPp-0006aw-Kx for 19392@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 09:19:58 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=390CEkhsbMA/kpglE937PDvUsGXK2ThtU3sP1l+eJno=; b=Hq79EMFAek66i2blcnp4HqQAsR hR3a9C7o5vaAt1fWFCT2iFNaDlqYjtnwqpB8ywEzO6ijKVDH0toGQst8cxTJKxY1UaaDP4Tb312UA Om1ttuUgCxX9g5SKH7qFzy/qbYIPf4+A0r+c3MG89VZJn/sODNzsxVvddxvTJIaCsm70=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1medPf-0007In-Uw; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 15:19:50 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Stefan Kangas Subject: Re: bug#19392: Emacs searches for dabbrevs in archive buffers References: <871r82qe5v.fsf@gnus.org> <878s2aowlm.fsf@gnus.org> <83czrl83ra.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1g0dg22.fsf@gnus.org> <83sg0g7q68.fsf@gnu.org> <875yxcrxy8.fsf@gnus.org> <87ee8abof3.fsf@gnus.org> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwAgMAAAAqbBEUAAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAADFBMVEUwGA+kTy7olFT/ //+IyZgpAAAAAWJLR0QDEQxM8gAAAAd0SU1FB+UKGAw3DMXrUjsAAADuSURBVCjPjc8xbsMwDABA ETB/EP6HAerdQyjAmtMhekWf0KFTpw42EOuVJSlZdjrVg8QzRZEKYf9IpMeXM3DUGHaB3HpGIf9B mOkEeoEfQ+EzwrGRdxto9l8OpIet6CXgB4i4Zu5eUxG/bGvT2tR9JqvRF16nBk0IOea79pXJqzCt DqjYDOygVKyeR4PkzSBivfEhFUu4eD9DXIJo/G4XSFrAIA0otvsE+Yk3R9ClPHGihmiQivituDbk ohgbSilLzyh+GsDwiXzgAxg7GJh6DcNEaY0H8tbwZljzDrvgD+AVKZcBGBwp520Ae2T5BQcodEfp GrRSAAAAOGVYSWZNTQAqAAAACAABh2kABAAAAAEAAAAaAAAAAAACoAIABAAAAAEAAAGQoAMABAAA AAEAAAGQAAAAADj5TfYAAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6Y3JlYXRlADIwMjEtMTAtMjRUMTI6NTU6MTErMDA6 MDB+Lt0lAAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOm1vZGlmeQAyMDIxLTEwLTI0VDEyOjU1OjExKzAwOjAwD3NlmQAA ABJ0RVh0ZXhpZjpFeGlmT2Zmc2V0ADI2UxuiZQAAABh0RVh0ZXhpZjpQaXhlbFhEaW1lbnNpb24A NDAwQPmChgAAABh0RVh0ZXhpZjpQaXhlbFlEaW1lbnNpb24ANDAw3fZj8AAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2021 15:19:47 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Kangas's message of "Sun, 24 Oct 2021 06:07:16 -0700") Message-ID: <87fssqa7bg.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Stefan Kangas writes: > Perhaps `hexl-mode' as well? Possibly -- does it load the binary data into a buffer? Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 19392 Cc: Eli Zaretskii , pogonyshev@gmail.com, 19392@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Stefan Kangas writes: > Perhaps `hexl-mode' as well? Possibly -- does it load the binary data into a buffer? > You could throw in `tetris-mode' and the other ones in play/, I guess. I don't think those have binary data (that may accidentally look like an abbreviation). -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 24 10:27:52 2021 Received: (at 19392) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Oct 2021 14:27:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40496 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1meeTX-0000QH-Ny for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 10:27:51 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-f175.google.com ([209.85.214.175]:41716) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1meeTT-0000Pp-P2 for 19392@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 10:27:48 -0400 Received: by mail-pl1-f175.google.com with SMTP id e10so6120009plh.8 for <19392@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 07:27:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=aotbYgsgnDoDKgrRexfV/sMQ52qbIKLNquNxva0vA6M=; b=dAOO/LWaMx8UJpXXenGoYrkq7tF/UU1SnDU106K5cAbXE/uS2baRMkapHL2ByAGgPB PxP8w5SAnWBZ2kQG/akdL2tzPAFvqqaM24beIEsGqX4ISJ4dXn7sZOXGOq66jpMuwOTd zNjVf9RjWkomXv0bRw2sm7MUU36/2n5DhHeHi5P9Qdj7BXwlT0tRuz++ouXnvx9f7zcP DAc0VOyUk7PZrw/tQcOJEnM+mc0Ihr1AiAj5DTl0qIO2Rri+kWxTlqbVDGIOe91pYTR6 I43K0w/V1Pysz6vXnF9NxNH5U5FpfaFqWqGemsWaRVzjxSLfUfKsN4rYKelAQSNdhq/k 6zQQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530CnphxEfb+neViCgLuMa5CVmWx+LK5Tu89iGi8iVZ2dxlq536r iC+r0hWeN6K7y22cShROP5XXHcOYp7SrkUQhgFk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxqAxaaVu2tg5zGF4DRmC+dhkrdlhqDRAXYmC3fUnH/prVYu0I/ZJyv5AGkVBhfseq7dt1xRYnBtiPYlOnug5Y= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:e750:b0:140:2693:b2e8 with SMTP id p16-20020a170902e75000b001402693b2e8mr11149178plf.22.1635085662051; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 07:27:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 07:27:41 -0700 From: Stefan Kangas In-Reply-To: <87fssqa7bg.fsf@gnus.org> References: <871r82qe5v.fsf@gnus.org> <878s2aowlm.fsf@gnus.org> <83czrl83ra.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1g0dg22.fsf@gnus.org> <83sg0g7q68.fsf@gnu.org> <875yxcrxy8.fsf@gnus.org> <87ee8abof3.fsf@gnus.org> <87fssqa7bg.fsf@gnus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2021 07:27:41 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#19392: Emacs searches for dabbrevs in archive buffers To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 19392 Cc: Eli Zaretskii , pogonyshev@gmail.com, 19392@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Stefan Kangas writes: > >> Perhaps `hexl-mode' as well? > > Possibly -- does it load the binary data into a buffer? It is just unlikely to produce anything useful. Here's what the start of a PNG file might look like, for example: 00000000: 8950 4e47 0d0a 1a0a 0000 000d 4948 4452 .PNG........IHDR 00000010: 0000 0a00 0000 05a0 0802 0000 001d 628d ..............b. 00000020: 8800 0000 0373 4249 5408 0808 dbe1 4fe0 .....sBIT.....O. 00000030: 0000 2000 4944 4154 785e ecdd 0760 14d5 .. .IDATx^...`.. 00000040: bec7 f1f4 4aef 5d40 a4ab 0822 0a8a 7410 ....J.]@..."..t. 00000050: c586 ca55 5111 bc56 042b 0f15 7bbd 8280 ...UQ..V.+..{... >> You could throw in `tetris-mode' and the other ones in play/, I guess. > > I don't think those have binary data (that may accidentally look like an > abbreviation). Right, it is another case of a buffer that will just contain nothing useful for completion purposes. But perhaps it doesn't contain anything harmful either. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 24 15:59:31 2021 Received: (at 19392) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Oct 2021 19:59:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41026 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mejeU-000320-V5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 15:59:31 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:47940) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mejeT-00031m-DA for 19392@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 15:59:30 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=t6iKMJ0JXNN9DUfdSAyf/1GYmA+mIBrtiR48JDF8+bQ=; b=VARCpttB3mDuOzVacXe/guEbyc SWOo2PwXs4TAXRzdGDPRsdY2iA5OA/S5wSbKe0Pel6eXiCH8LUn0HyWg60s8d2GjIyQmLzVFZ7s/3 iZv9Dk6AzKYens3Be8dKMYNKUwZTNPXuDQRudYfXxSP9aEs4R22UlOTvb2H/LkrGNRQE=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mejeJ-00027r-Ia; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 21:59:22 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Stefan Kangas Subject: Re: bug#19392: Emacs searches for dabbrevs in archive buffers References: <871r82qe5v.fsf@gnus.org> <878s2aowlm.fsf@gnus.org> <83czrl83ra.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1g0dg22.fsf@gnus.org> <83sg0g7q68.fsf@gnu.org> <875yxcrxy8.fsf@gnus.org> <87ee8abof3.fsf@gnus.org> <87fssqa7bg.fsf@gnus.org> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAElBMVEWbmpu2qs14cY5T Yo9EM1b///9aDEYQAAAAAWJLR0QF+G/pxwAAAAd0SU1FB+UKGBMJCJQ5aRIAAAGTSURBVDjLZZOL rcMgDEWJ0wFavQWQYQAUM0AF3n+mZ5tvGlRViU/u9Qdwzh2fj3MOgHS5x8pEgejyMwAoS15PonTS tb6EAJgEqNNbJA4mONMASQEucClATZ0pgZ85IHl54cCUWcqaCnmQ5MCcmavKuht4cCpnXRKuTKF4 U4hRByrIVRyvbuWHQpCBol4YrKooUfllYWwKJ4MQgHjJkyH5SwayKE6t5o+sMCa25AFlJKe32eaW iNcQIVhBHdQ1So2T5TWygMWlwQfINGLqlhaIw0VFm8CdddZ0E7QkHdQbUMlQMI4dsZ0V+3TENrAG MHOWJnPF4/PSbeR+VjCqWhaR7CMFkbR9fw1r3VyuqJ81Enlb1mE/kPAA3esuubZhTQkh2SDLAFNi R4HZP8DP2OEe5wJjJitm8xoC/HH6jvgQlPYFTsEsNgcttmypC8d+dOMGnIJep+cdwD37dwL3svy1 cg21wA48vtoVCHW76eLlcDZfXPQb8qP7bPeP8iTvPrCCx6E93wy93POrH7+VxR1a90r9DwbDn2gc 12KoAAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOmNyZWF0ZQAyMDIxLTEwLTI0VDE5OjA5OjA4KzAwOjAwq75rBwAAACV0 RVh0ZGF0ZTptb2RpZnkAMjAyMS0xMC0yNFQxOTowOTowOCswMDowMNrj07sAAAAASUVORK5CYII= Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2021 21:59:19 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Kangas's message of "Sun, 24 Oct 2021 07:27:41 -0700") Message-ID: <8735oq2nzc.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Stefan Kangas writes: > It is just unlikely to produce anything useful. Here's what the start > of a PNG file might look like, for example: > > 00000000: 8950 4e47 0d0a 1a0a 0000 000d 4948 4452 .PNG........IHDR > 00000010: [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 19392 Cc: Eli Zaretskii , pogonyshev@gmail.com, 19392@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Stefan Kangas writes: > It is just unlikely to produce anything useful. Here's what the start > of a PNG file might look like, for example: > > 00000000: 8950 4e47 0d0a 1a0a 0000 000d 4948 4452 .PNG........IHDR > 00000010: 0000 0a00 0000 05a0 0802 0000 001d 628d ..............b. True, that's a good candidate for exclusion, too. >>> You could throw in `tetris-mode' and the other ones in play/, I guess. >> >> I don't think those have binary data (that may accidentally look like an >> abbreviation). > > Right, it is another case of a buffer that will just contain nothing > useful for completion purposes. But perhaps it doesn't contain anything > harmful either. Yeah, it seems unlikely that there'll be much in a Tetris buffers that looks like text. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 07 07:21:00 2022 Received: (at 19392) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 May 2022 11:21:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50627 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nnIUd-0006CA-Pe for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 May 2022 07:20:59 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:46986) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nnIUb-0006Bu-Up for 19392@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 May 2022 07:20:58 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Z5cGmM8ieKW5DjsunoxokOAbAlzfUYCrP66bpPYFZdw=; b=qvLCYvOwhRMg6I8HGrFgN3xlEt 4gRSuI0/6XaI+irJFcln8hzwAjixeGNTK03yK7KdFDYy74dM1iHubnnOUw4lKVjK8Yef9FI4TFkvV axDOVcfnTyTXrMPZ3YOMnphXb8W/Fqxkljp3ugCp+kHcCh1akiKjp7f0DcP3OyioCQPI=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nnIUT-00024B-7v; Sat, 07 May 2022 13:20:51 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Paul Pogonyshev Subject: Re: bug#19392: Emacs searches for dabbrevs in archive buffers References: <871r82qe5v.fsf@gnus.org> <878s2aowlm.fsf@gnus.org> X-Now-Playing: Coil's _The New Backwards (extended edition)_: "Backwards Live WIP-fixed softer backwards" Date: Sat, 07 May 2022 13:20:47 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Paul Pogonyshev's message of "Tue, 13 Jul 2021 23:12:27 +0200") Message-ID: <87h761si5s.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Paul Pogonyshev writes: > $ emacs -Q random.zip > > 1. Switch to buffer "*scratch*" > 2. Type "P" (without quotes) > 3. Press M-/ > 4. Here it finds expansion "PK" from buffer "random.zip". Cycling > with M-/ finds a few mor [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 19392 Cc: 19392@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Paul Pogonyshev writes: > $ emacs -Q random.zip > > 1. Switch to buffer "*scratch*" > 2. Type "P" (without quotes) > 3. Press M-/ > 4. Here it finds expansion "PK" from buffer "random.zip". Cycling > with M-/ finds a few more, which are more binary-like. I've now fixed this in Emacs 29. Instead of making some kind of framework for letting modes specify this themselves, it seems more user friendly to just introduce a new dabbrev-ignored-buffer-modes variable, so I did that. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 07 07:21:04 2022 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 May 2022 11:21:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50631 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nnIUi-0006D8-0g for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 May 2022 07:21:04 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:47000) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nnIUg-0006C1-N9 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 May 2022 07:21:02 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=LEVR2MGXAjzy0Ss+4/yAJm46EKnsfrsLd5zjCc18uOw=; b=s3fpR5oTrvX76B5iPT8WLfgjf4 7973/ZdZjxMexyIJ3zgdnaVulpQTkxihnHVw8uL0greOideL6jX8Bj+xQl4eX8JfESZ22U/uV59iU L7sZNohI/jxFqi6ahC2VS7euPIxb1OdfmsxdLJbOnaxR5ve4Ofiq1yWeI34TfSibVHu0=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nnIUZ-00024L-0h for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 May 2022 13:20:56 +0200 Date: Sat, 07 May 2022 13:20:54 +0200 Message-Id: <87fsllsi5l.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #19392 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 19392 29.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) close 19392 29.1 quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 07 08:19:59 2022 Received: (at 19392) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 May 2022 12:19:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50711 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nnJPi-0005pK-Sf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 May 2022 08:19:59 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43150) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nnJPg-0005p6-To for 19392@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 May 2022 08:19:57 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:37844) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nnJPb-00026t-KW; Sat, 07 May 2022 08:19:51 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=fvBT3M4PkXFl/yROQnkFMWIOurcgvixIx9e84wlgYlM=; b=ISc3jLeSwqMn K9AGP+A8NQe9kVjF8Rtww8xuMYa23LWbNboRDG6+SnPkvl+SL+IXYfYH5dPYIYEXDO0r6uJgOWRAu 6YAJspA1IKTrGB+KvlHXKf4sezcyinpJPeqO2Lx7o3lbcjLbQt6YZQOWXqdUk7ZkvEV9LJ92lEpX0 k3MNMS04ZPfZkjsSjegASw7msVDbvMVWJfjGub7VbaLKndYs4k/yDRf158SAv8lw+pyDoEc3+6st3 EH76OSPatR/f056EAUnBh3h1ethHmyArvGnh2bKyBuK+KNPvBdv8yOPSnH33chTetxy8JAiOuj21b LRMDrkNoWSGySJIVL5FF3g==; Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3610 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nnJPb-0005HJ-3M; Sat, 07 May 2022 08:19:51 -0400 Date: Sat, 07 May 2022 15:19:42 +0300 Message-Id: <83tua1y1pd.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Lars Ingebrigtsen In-Reply-To: <87h761si5s.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Sat, 07 May 2022 13:20:47 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#19392: Emacs searches for dabbrevs in archive buffers References: <871r82qe5v.fsf@gnus.org> <878s2aowlm.fsf@gnus.org> <87h761si5s.fsf@gnus.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 19392 Cc: pogonyshev@gmail.com, 19392@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > Cc: 19392@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Sat, 07 May 2022 13:20:47 +0200 > > Paul Pogonyshev writes: > > > $ emacs -Q random.zip > > > > 1. Switch to buffer "*scratch*" > > 2. Type "P" (without quotes) > > 3. Press M-/ > > 4. Here it finds expansion "PK" from buffer "random.zip". Cycling > > with M-/ finds a few more, which are more binary-like. > > I've now fixed this in Emacs 29. Instead of making some kind of > framework for letting modes specify this themselves, it seems more user > friendly to just introduce a new dabbrev-ignored-buffer-modes variable, > so I did that. Does tar-mode really belong to the list of those modes? Unlike archive-mode, where each file is separately compressed into binary garbage, tar-mode shows the original files, and the only "binary" parts are the headers, most of which are also plain text. So I'd suggest to remove tar-mode for the default list of modes. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 07 08:35:59 2022 Received: (at 19392) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 May 2022 12:35:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50727 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nnJfC-0006EP-QX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 May 2022 08:35:58 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:47804) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nnJfB-0006EC-Mv for 19392@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 May 2022 08:35:58 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=lGIpun34v+G+3sPIQGkfOo+TbPHWPO/Po0KTl22OivQ=; b=i4iRCCfPOeXc4Bx9xbYMRoYurX Ex3zWh9gVM2L6dt4d2RfshZgYRsQaMyq7+aGUTCpO7lKdx0g/tgi0WXcwxfot/gt+LZ3xU4U7eST8 phS+OB7zx+oWr2DmbUIaIibdP8k8mOFZ0Z1E1aJKShmsxGXxkxQqdY+tXKAauqb/BN1s=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nnJf3-0002iL-4Z; Sat, 07 May 2022 14:35:51 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#19392: Emacs searches for dabbrevs in archive buffers References: <871r82qe5v.fsf@gnus.org> <878s2aowlm.fsf@gnus.org> <87h761si5s.fsf@gnus.org> <83tua1y1pd.fsf@gnu.org> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwAgMAAAAqbBEUAAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAADFBMVEUVDhlMNzychGz/ //+vfufMAAAAAWJLR0QDEQxM8gAAAAd0SU1FB+YFBwwjFPSXv44AAAGXSURBVCjPTZHBattAEIb/ Ba0OPinFKtGeXGiCo6cYgWRoTyuza2qfYvCaSE/RlrbnpCSl9NSCBJKesrOybDKX3U8z+8/8IwgN Djkv/CHcCFdFzkd55FSA5GrOQK4BYh3EMX+UrgVMHAURg63pUQwkSKw8gGaWEGcrgnWIVOMFWXwT Yq4sQ+EzAwsP4aOWkrBlMRxlXkhFIF+SzjrjbhiMgKk/9ocqDWCiCKtm17r+GIDeHbBurFX9mxzZ 8Teo2VzXOauWzor8IeyswRz6XmR0N+sRM2Dx9kknYR8pGGBv/+mMYZYR5H5oNTZ9FL6w05JBrDsI XoLY/+HpggqCLYjb72ztodLcBnS7eyZg3B4ordvTjSNhMGf4dGfvLxn9Xjq6wEK7sSzwAodJyf+G YgnhyyK/iw9LnVRM8Qn+Vn2mIf1DWr7U7dPUqUzj2uqpU6HsNo/OkH6riOeGl7TD5ySz0wTr3fO2 NIhGyFQeFwaLkx/1xV1Aq6/9uE0f18OvZptPb+Tws6kuVusfr0DtuurcBzPVVcHp+h+LqWsDcmy7 kQAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTpjcmVhdGUAMjAyMi0wNS0wN1QxMjozNToxOSswMDowMDoVZogAAAAldEVY dGRhdGU6bW9kaWZ5ADIwMjItMDUtMDdUMTI6MzU6MTkrMDA6MDBLSN40AAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Now-Playing: Prince's _Sign 'O' the Times (6): Vault Tracks III_: "I Need A Man" Date: Sat, 07 May 2022 14:35:47 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83tua1y1pd.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 07 May 2022 15:19:42 +0300") Message-ID: <87wnexo6zg.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Does tar-mode really belong to the list of those modes? Unlike > archive-mode, where each file is separately compressed into binary > garbage, tar-mode shows the original files, and the only "binary [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 19392 Cc: pogonyshev@gmail.com, 19392@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Eli Zaretskii writes: > Does tar-mode really belong to the list of those modes? Unlike > archive-mode, where each file is separately compressed into binary > garbage, tar-mode shows the original files, and the only "binary" > parts are the headers, most of which are also plain text. So I'd > suggest to remove tar-mode for the default list of modes. Ah, yes, I'd forgotten that. So I've now removed the mode from the default list. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From unknown Sat Sep 06 14:23:47 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2022 11:24:08 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator