Subject: bug#19390: 25.0.50; `package-activate' is too slow

From: Artur Malabarba <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 17:01:37 -0200

Sorry. The rest of the message was just babling anyway.
I was just saying the performance hit of the current implementation is
negligible when upgrading.
Which is the same thing Stefan is saying.

2014-12-18 15:52 GMT-02:00 Dmitry Gutov <[email-masked]>:
> On 12/18/2014 07:39 PM, Artur Malabarba wrote:
>
>> During package-initialize these things add up, so that's certainly a
>> lot. But during a regular upgrade, what fraction of the total load time
>> does that amount to? Even for large packages like helm I think this
>> percentage should be small. But
>
>
>                                  ^^
> The message cuts off here.