GNU bug report logs -
#19343
25.0.50; [vc-git] Unregistered file becomes `up-to-date' in vc-dir buffer after editing and saving
Previous Next
Reported by: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 22:17:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Found in version 25.0.50
Done: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Mon, 1 May 2017 04:36:13 +0300
with message-id <b2f98f01-6050-e957-657e-44d0aed0f1bd <at> yandex.ru>
and subject line Re: bug#19343: 25.0.50; [vc-git] Unregistered file becomes `up-to-date' in vc-dir buffer after editing and saving
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #19343,
regarding 25.0.50; [vc-git] Unregistered file becomes `up-to-date' in vc-dir buffer after editing and saving
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)
--
19343: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=19343
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
1. Open vc-dir for the repository with an unregistered file.
2. Open the file in Emacs, modify, save.
3. See it become `up-to-date' in the vc-dir buffer.
4. Switch to vc-dir, press `g'. See it become `unregistered' again.
Apparently, in part it's a result of how bug#11757 was resolved (see the
comment at the top of `vc-git-state'), but I don't remember seeing this
problem before Emacs 25. Yet I don't see anything specific among the
recent changes that caused it.
Maybe `vc-git-state' should call `git status --short' instead of `git
diff-index'.
In GNU Emacs 25.0.50.3 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.10.8)
of 2014-12-10 on axl
Repository revision: bdc373bf456de464b44836b11826705c0aef70b1
Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11501000
System Description: Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
On 17.12.2014 17:40, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>> What's our minimum version?
>>
>> Debian Stable has 1.7.10.4, but CentOS 6 - only 1.7.1.
>>
>> So apparently we can use `status --short' (or rather --porcelain), but
>> --ignored is no-go for now.
>
> Why can't we use --ignored when it's available? It doesn't feel right
> to me to punish users of newer versions just because someone else out
> there might not have such a version.
I've just pushed a patch (24301c8148f5f3220d7e597c73a59551cfa10eea)
which fixes this bug, and also uses ---ignored, because that's how the
Jonathan wrote it.
Do we still care about CentOS 6? The previous message in this discussion
has been more than 2 years ago.
If so, we can remove --ignored from the call in vc-git-state, it's not
hugely important there. It will be more important when we decide to
reimplement vc-git-status-files in the same fashion, though.
This bug report was last modified 8 years and 79 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.