From unknown Fri Aug 15 12:53:56 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#19343 <19343@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#19343 <19343@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 25.0.50; [vc-git] Unregistered file becomes `up-to-date' in vc-dir buffer after editing and saving Reply-To: bug#19343 <19343@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2025 19:53:56 +0000 retitle 19343 25.0.50; [vc-git] Unregistered file becomes `up-to-date' in v= c-dir buffer after editing and saving reassign 19343 emacs submitter 19343 Dmitry Gutov severity 19343 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 10 17:16:06 2014 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Dec 2014 22:16:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42094 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XypYE-00033P-12 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 17:16:06 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40015) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XypYC-00032p-1D for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 17:16:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XypY0-0002XB-Sd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 17:15:58 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:59653) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XypY0-0002X2-PM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 17:15:52 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41621) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XypXu-000654-Fz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 17:15:52 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XypXo-0002SZ-GT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 17:15:46 -0500 Received: from mail-wi0-x22a.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22a]:42766) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XypXo-0002SP-68 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 17:15:40 -0500 Received: by mail-wi0-f170.google.com with SMTP id bs8so14767286wib.1 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 14:15:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=emOCvkqcyaap9imv2iPJt0PWTLUfqtcLDSXRTHFUw74=; b=ahrHlvx09cx6zx+ZML9+J/9ObIQp2dSw59hC9EP9Y+1sT4xIh//N/WTyEu1Zh339su p5o+jGJkCXpjOMrexA6NPH5u0Adywhmj0OJqSLXnhIefTmYHq0sa2cqJ+qlnOJTVAm1p qUShr/gdClt7CQsjMcaGsqXw+I+F5pVqHNZ52ie9fZirW9O6M5XscjUVwjf37Dcb7ZZS mOUCGp57TPgDpFhqAGRiDJsrftBxrPlneTXufnt3ArQqLTsfgx3Q1Y/pIvcG3EOxR8Ly idgLtX3S6+LzphzEjWXa+ezhTqOLDQdZYtXi328Z9YKTenjorYWrEEgrvlq72e0b/fuP 4WPQ== X-Received: by 10.181.13.106 with SMTP id ex10mr9972871wid.36.1418249739418; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 14:15:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from axl ([82.102.93.58]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id n5sm420589wic.6.2014.12.10.14.15.37 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 10 Dec 2014 14:15:39 -0800 (PST) From: Dmitry Gutov To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 25.0.50; [vc-git] Unregistered file becomes `up-to-date' in vc-dir buffer after editing and saving Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 00:15:35 +0200 Message-ID: <86oarbqhh4.fsf@yandex.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) 1. Open vc-dir for the repository with an unregistered file. 2. Open the file in Emacs, modify, save. 3. See it become `up-to-date' in the vc-dir buffer. 4. Switch to vc-dir, press `g'. See it become `unregistered' again. Apparently, in part it's a result of how bug#11757 was resolved (see the comment at the top of `vc-git-state'), but I don't remember seeing this problem before Emacs 25. Yet I don't see anything specific among the recent changes that caused it. Maybe `vc-git-state' should call `git status --short' instead of `git diff-index'. In GNU Emacs 25.0.50.3 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.10.8) of 2014-12-10 on axl Repository revision: bdc373bf456de464b44836b11826705c0aef70b1 Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11501000 System Description: Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Dec 15 07:01:18 2014 Received: (at 19343) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Dec 2014 12:01:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46500 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y0UKz-00019O-OA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 07:01:17 -0500 Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com ([209.85.212.173]:38463) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y0UKw-000199-5y for 19343@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 07:01:14 -0500 Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id r20so8635401wiv.0 for <19343@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 04:01:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=hjwDnvahcbLusBgYpfHP6crfv9qpXu+i2rhIguUJN4I=; b=JO2G0AxdR8HhWK96bXtydwdTCk67PGj7WD23L5vM4OjegAg3J18b2XHOfCXbqbW3xL iXctMEUjMWmP8d+zZ8lJEpicIN5+QnhuX7mHB9JlRtD3N6JzA4qwm64yZ1CC+SUeYPAL hnyAEBv5dZi+865rPkXb6GMGCeuYxsbUU4xQKaByHabo+PkNwcKT/Ejs74feVZ7mPH7y jFI1AbXVhP51r1k/4SF6ueOfSncTChbtTJwXalIs3VxOsKrPvFv9CCzMk358lbdcaPz9 TMDB5tin3PyjTGqAxX0Q/jS5VWNW5c+yfVZyhKTCIqss8MfG5TvKK2s3g9CmsgbDseC/ uHsA== X-Received: by 10.180.109.130 with SMTP id hs2mr31107935wib.54.1418644868220; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 04:01:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from axl ([82.102.93.58]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id dv9sm11290561wib.14.2014.12.15.04.01.06 for <19343@debbugs.gnu.org> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 15 Dec 2014 04:01:07 -0800 (PST) From: Dmitry Gutov To: 19343@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#19343: 25.0.50; [vc-git] Unregistered file becomes `up-to-date' in vc-dir buffer after editing and saving References: <86oarbqhh4.fsf@yandex.ru> Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 14:01:03 +0200 In-Reply-To: <86oarbqhh4.fsf@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Thu, 11 Dec 2014 00:15:35 +0200") Message-ID: <86fvchdsw0.fsf@yandex.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.51 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 19343 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/) Dmitry Gutov writes: > but I don't remember seeing this problem before Emacs 25 Correction: it's also present in `emacs-24' and even 24.3. So it's quite possible that the problem was introduced while fixing the aforementioned bug. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 16 23:28:19 2014 Received: (at 19343) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Dec 2014 04:28:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48319 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y16Dj-0003TW-7J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 23:28:19 -0500 Received: from mail-wg0-f46.google.com ([74.125.82.46]:35907) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y16Dh-0003TO-Pv for 19343@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 23:28:18 -0500 Received: by mail-wg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id x13so19328115wgg.33 for <19343@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 20:28:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=0iw5NONF3RHTCY5g7XA6VcX+V94Hze4sDvoHWmHDFU4=; b=Uk5HzcX1rIbruwqclPmFHIhuuRrFeD8MpzRExTOGJhO7v8felmAwExMltaqOlObOUn WEFHHC2x3lLsFUlERcICCzc2sAXijCnKzvCb4J+VuyHu/JJqMJHYz8NzO5QOkICAFcku lq+ZQHKyE3HwUodGMy3AoqiVyCohC9i0udBw64cTe481tsXrQP8ISzVNei/i0tqQNuHO sgYirTi4cWMmbw8XhR07rP7H3X+l+9wTBwsWQflLJantzxrouxEDJ7AwTnm0m1nQjF9d fimT8kGiRqhNS+/n8NLXvotyDEq/aiKLM9ZtcDX7jC7r2dwtySkSY6HoIWz9b+USozwV ARAA== X-Received: by 10.180.211.2 with SMTP id my2mr10251885wic.3.1418790497257; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 20:28:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from axl ([82.102.93.58]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id o2sm4526936wiy.11.2014.12.16.20.28.16 for <19343@debbugs.gnu.org> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 16 Dec 2014 20:28:16 -0800 (PST) From: Dmitry Gutov To: 19343@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#19343: 25.0.50; [vc-git] Unregistered file becomes `up-to-date' in vc-dir buffer after editing and saving References: <86oarbqhh4.fsf@yandex.ru> <86fvchdsw0.fsf@yandex.ru> Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 06:28:13 +0200 In-Reply-To: <86fvchdsw0.fsf@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Mon, 15 Dec 2014 14:01:03 +0200") Message-ID: <867fxqvr1e.fsf@yandex.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 19343 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Looking though https://git.kernel.org/cgit/git/git.git/tree/Documentation/RelNotes, 'git status --short' was introduced in 1.7.0. What's our minimum version? Starting with 1.7.6.2, we can also use `git status --ignored', to list files in all major states. This can help with an old FIXME in `vc-git-state' about it never returning `ignored', and also radically simplify (and speed up) `vc-git-dir-status-files'. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 17 08:19:35 2014 Received: (at 19343) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Dec 2014 13:19:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48534 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y1EVr-0002fy-0q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 08:19:35 -0500 Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com ([209.85.212.173]:38994) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y1EVo-0002fm-PY for 19343@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 08:19:33 -0500 Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id r20so15691343wiv.6 for <19343@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 05:19:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=Z1kbCs1pTT1oSRlnqHiHXdbu4ZqMqE+TxmzG6nwno2w=; b=0bx0Uk51F+ar/zFiDWwND+d2gGSEBEX6oRiGtgE3LlCvxViFqS0UfacOwpyAMG1XAq caQVhZgxoZt3jLRkq5wkwA+oe82qaGclJEaoMgRvueDjubc3OfLApVBj3IoPnTpNDjp/ 69ne/oT3yhZRyXJyUVGlUdYJJ5cOxAYKGJbV94rk7btmYRCaSf6Yqf5lQIXd84c9BLd9 l/IS/pq2i6Za0CU2ujw+fwceLhCN2d6Pbetg0fL0FHQe2IDuq++iglmy9XQFT9GuIW55 Z0o7srGL2AThUVApYngdUsJRY9AVDUQQWkET88BhAeV9wXhSxf7EBq2nGeRLBuJy4c9g ahvg== X-Received: by 10.194.108.202 with SMTP id hm10mr64539348wjb.72.1418822372103; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 05:19:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from axl ([82.102.93.58]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id gl5sm20848240wib.0.2014.12.17.05.19.30 for <19343@debbugs.gnu.org> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 17 Dec 2014 05:19:31 -0800 (PST) From: Dmitry Gutov To: 19343@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#19343: 25.0.50; [vc-git] Unregistered file becomes `up-to-date' in vc-dir buffer after editing and saving References: <86oarbqhh4.fsf@yandex.ru> <86fvchdsw0.fsf@yandex.ru> <867fxqvr1e.fsf@yandex.ru> Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 15:19:27 +0200 In-Reply-To: <867fxqvr1e.fsf@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Wed, 17 Dec 2014 06:28:13 +0200") Message-ID: <861tny9zxc.fsf@yandex.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.51 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 19343 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) > What's our minimum version? Debian Stable has 1.7.10.4, but CentOS 6 - only 1.7.1. So apparently we can use `status --short' (or rather --porcelain), but --ignored is no-go for now. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 17 10:41:00 2014 Received: (at 19343) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Dec 2014 15:41:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49011 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y1Gih-0000j5-PG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 10:41:00 -0500 Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:53869) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y1Gif-0000it-6H for 19343@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 10:40:58 -0500 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NGQ00500GUTTC00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for 19343@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 17:40:56 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NGQ005EJGW7OB50@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 17:40:56 +0200 (IST) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 17:40:48 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#19343: 25.0.50; [vc-git] Unregistered file becomes `up-to-date' in vc-dir buffer after editing and saving In-reply-to: <861tny9zxc.fsf@yandex.ru> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Dmitry Gutov Message-id: <834msuwagv.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86oarbqhh4.fsf@yandex.ru> <86fvchdsw0.fsf@yandex.ru> <867fxqvr1e.fsf@yandex.ru> <861tny9zxc.fsf@yandex.ru> X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 19343 Cc: 19343@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 15:19:27 +0200 > > > What's our minimum version? > > Debian Stable has 1.7.10.4, but CentOS 6 - only 1.7.1. > > So apparently we can use `status --short' (or rather --porcelain), but > --ignored is no-go for now. Why can't we use --ignored when it's available? It doesn't feel right to me to punish users of newer versions just because someone else out there might not have such a version. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 17 12:11:09 2014 Received: (at 19343) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Dec 2014 17:11:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49128 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y1I7x-0004a6-Dm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 12:11:09 -0500 Received: from mail-wg0-f48.google.com ([74.125.82.48]:37880) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y1I7v-0004Zv-30 for 19343@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 12:11:07 -0500 Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id y19so20851516wgg.7 for <19343@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 09:11:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FUw+lkv9T3zBsGsVybAVZCUPmgHukzol2lm/J9aE39U=; b=ogf03BBM+E9mU2EcDOxchSCDIsat10FuyDVQMxIBGkPABUZDJhDyPZgkXiu2mdKGZY DeeYfkLTNHgx9ulcbE36wcF1yR22RFmh2sXm7jlbt1SJIl6aWf0pVZkAtTTefFEJdwtt 1QZKjqK9Ppi5i2kGOqxbF1v7PAOI0h+eg9kjPzPLhQ4lVurLf9tpIHFS2TiAs9/hKNu9 bjfL3Sm6AIeJy8W5Ftk5Wrz/XicdQR5eVDwByLyjtyH6m9rEF2vVAT5AAugsMLDAoXQO BmsrWw5vK9hY+JL9jIciQT28JgLVZAvQLzt93npjvzahzaYfiZaP7lhHJK2cU+D0d0vt 86BQ== X-Received: by 10.180.80.163 with SMTP id s3mr16040137wix.59.1418836265135; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 09:11:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.185] (static-nbl2-118.cytanet.com.cy. [212.31.107.118]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id d5sm5812625wjb.34.2014.12.17.09.11.03 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 17 Dec 2014 09:11:04 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5491B927.7030009@yandex.ru> Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 19:11:03 +0200 From: Dmitry Gutov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#19343: 25.0.50; [vc-git] Unregistered file becomes `up-to-date' in vc-dir buffer after editing and saving References: <86oarbqhh4.fsf@yandex.ru> <86fvchdsw0.fsf@yandex.ru> <867fxqvr1e.fsf@yandex.ru> <861tny9zxc.fsf@yandex.ru> <834msuwagv.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <834msuwagv.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 19343 Cc: 19343@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) On 12/17/2014 05:40 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Why can't we use --ignored when it's available? It doesn't feel right > to me to punish users of newer versions just because someone else out > there might not have such a version. Sure we can, it's just more code complexity to support different code paths. Considering there hasn't been many user complaints about either issue (vc-git-state never returns `ignored'; vc-git-dir-status-files is slower that it could be), maybe that's not worth it. Waiting a few years would be easier. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 17 13:15:19 2014 Received: (at 19343) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Dec 2014 18:15:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49183 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y1J83-0000XX-BK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 13:15:19 -0500 Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:64414) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y1J80-0000XK-70 for 19343@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 13:15:17 -0500 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NGQ00400NDHOD00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for 19343@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:15:14 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NGQ004KEO1DP600@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:15:14 +0200 (IST) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:15:07 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#19343: 25.0.50; [vc-git] Unregistered file becomes `up-to-date' in vc-dir buffer after editing and saving In-reply-to: <5491B927.7030009@yandex.ru> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Dmitry Gutov Message-id: <83wq5quor8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86oarbqhh4.fsf@yandex.ru> <86fvchdsw0.fsf@yandex.ru> <867fxqvr1e.fsf@yandex.ru> <861tny9zxc.fsf@yandex.ru> <834msuwagv.fsf@gnu.org> <5491B927.7030009@yandex.ru> X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 19343 Cc: 19343@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) > Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 19:11:03 +0200 > From: Dmitry Gutov > CC: 19343@debbugs.gnu.org > > On 12/17/2014 05:40 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Why can't we use --ignored when it's available? It doesn't feel right > > to me to punish users of newer versions just because someone else out > > there might not have such a version. > > Sure we can, it's just more code complexity to support different code paths. > > Considering there hasn't been many user complaints about either issue > (vc-git-state never returns `ignored'; vc-git-dir-status-files is slower > that it could be), maybe that's not worth it. Waiting a few years would > be easier. It's up to you, I just wanted to raise the possibility. Thanks. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 30 21:36:23 2017 Received: (at 19343-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 May 2017 01:36:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48295 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d50GF-0000wR-0y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 30 Apr 2017 21:36:23 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53]:38340) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d50GC-0000w4-My for 19343-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 30 Apr 2017 21:36:20 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f53.google.com with SMTP id r190so88985864wme.1 for <19343-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 30 Apr 2017 18:36:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AGnGp9UxF4RiZd9CUpS/wPAhxYLCAxdcOSNYU/ve7og=; b=Aw0athS73OheOjvDQBSBVb2MhRUGXGmlBK9iOwJKLh3mAFWGKfwJFHNI8zZz6eOQ/Q 3vzW9yzyzkG0yJzEKWAMLVSEYgbTFa2qzVtu9JkOC11CWrr8Sza6Nl7FsPAJ6LgA6q2k qYlL6D33JhUHLnDxtKQ0qThq/tzeDFcVliO/EARU40VU/2BP+fiEzgFQyxX7vFbjWHMQ VKNMAhOrVfYKkqH7uoRR/E/WbcGGsyNIjIwUAvu8ZbJwGvNxQ16kBTt4jGkCgx8p+SvI M4Wmd8AeS8X9tPPBYlhJtHI2fw6FswjOHYWo7SobAlMt0+lNkj9zD+g3mFnXgpZBKz64 pGuA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=AGnGp9UxF4RiZd9CUpS/wPAhxYLCAxdcOSNYU/ve7og=; b=cg3wzIc5nl1mMJk2Myua3WjD+HL21YEGS5zNYV3RLBxM7qFWWELQ4oCpFCjXRmosKR raXKGYZXe1rdCcVbXZ+6tlP5fmeUq+5TtTeagLTRC2PM4JhYYHuwwqaEEKLs0pzh2kkP jWUucPh1pXc1/Ceqb9YLL83/ndRfIqYqAmt0pSmDaHawPPSeU4IRFtFFRvXE4bfgzUOp Y7SWAN6dy13uHbiD6cuJMWMqQHimzHmufaZrGqBoCFzMqL0ujqOH3LHmtnhR9Ltfpujc Gpp1ajcIuDw6zMKQCD3gGJ+fLcB77aRw6NCNQ5YJDkj1lJYUK/K1HlaLDnKWhAb36bHK AojA== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/7nMAOjWR8a5apDkg26kObtq4T1czILVOfQLrO3chEgWDgne/ln SkdzPb/XHxz8iw== X-Received: by 10.28.161.66 with SMTP id k63mr1961743wme.46.1493602575008; Sun, 30 Apr 2017 18:36:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([185.105.173.156]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id x70sm9579856wmf.1.2017.04.30.18.36.13 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 30 Apr 2017 18:36:14 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: bug#19343: 25.0.50; [vc-git] Unregistered file becomes `up-to-date' in vc-dir buffer after editing and saving To: Eli Zaretskii References: <86oarbqhh4.fsf@yandex.ru> <86fvchdsw0.fsf@yandex.ru> <867fxqvr1e.fsf@yandex.ru> <861tny9zxc.fsf@yandex.ru> <834msuwagv.fsf@gnu.org> From: Dmitry Gutov Message-ID: Date: Mon, 1 May 2017 04:36:13 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:53.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/53.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <834msuwagv.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 19343-done Cc: 19343-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) On 17.12.2014 17:40, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >>> What's our minimum version? >> >> Debian Stable has 1.7.10.4, but CentOS 6 - only 1.7.1. >> >> So apparently we can use `status --short' (or rather --porcelain), but >> --ignored is no-go for now. > > Why can't we use --ignored when it's available? It doesn't feel right > to me to punish users of newer versions just because someone else out > there might not have such a version. I've just pushed a patch (24301c8148f5f3220d7e597c73a59551cfa10eea) which fixes this bug, and also uses ---ignored, because that's how the Jonathan wrote it. Do we still care about CentOS 6? The previous message in this discussion has been more than 2 years ago. If so, we can remove --ignored from the call in vc-git-state, it's not hugely important there. It will be more important when we decide to reimplement vc-git-status-files in the same fashion, though. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 01 03:10:55 2017 Received: (at 19343) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 May 2017 07:10:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48446 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d55Tz-00029u-NC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 May 2017 03:10:55 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35383) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d55Ty-00029i-DL for 19343@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 May 2017 03:10:54 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d55Tq-0001Jj-1n for 19343@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 May 2017 03:10:49 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:34685) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d55Tp-0001Je-TG; Mon, 01 May 2017 03:10:45 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3072 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1d55Tp-0006jW-4P; Mon, 01 May 2017 03:10:45 -0400 Date: Mon, 01 May 2017 10:10:19 +0300 Message-Id: <83lgqhjbms.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Dmitry Gutov In-reply-to: (message from Dmitry Gutov on Mon, 1 May 2017 04:36:13 +0300) Subject: Re: bug#19343: 25.0.50; [vc-git] Unregistered file becomes `up-to-date' in vc-dir buffer after editing and saving References: <86oarbqhh4.fsf@yandex.ru> <86fvchdsw0.fsf@yandex.ru> <867fxqvr1e.fsf@yandex.ru> <861tny9zxc.fsf@yandex.ru> <834msuwagv.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 19343 Cc: 19343@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) > Cc: 19343-done@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Mon, 1 May 2017 04:36:13 +0300 > > > Why can't we use --ignored when it's available? It doesn't feel right > > to me to punish users of newer versions just because someone else out > > there might not have such a version. > > I've just pushed a patch (24301c8148f5f3220d7e597c73a59551cfa10eea) > which fixes this bug, and also uses ---ignored, because that's how the > Jonathan wrote it. Thanks. > Do we still care about CentOS 6? I don't know. According to my references, it will be maintained until 2021 at least, possibly as late as 2024. If that's true, then yes, we should care. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 01 11:01:01 2017 Received: (at 19343) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 May 2017 15:01:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49785 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d5Cov-0001vT-Nd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 May 2017 11:01:01 -0400 Received: from mail-wr0-f172.google.com ([209.85.128.172]:34646) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d5Cou-0001v4-NP for 19343@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 May 2017 11:01:01 -0400 Received: by mail-wr0-f172.google.com with SMTP id l9so64590243wre.1 for <19343@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 01 May 2017 08:01:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OOsO1yI6yK4ZoO7Nd1rXtP9Ojg264/uzGbbIjGUddBA=; b=E26UzUfrgiW+ZTByGCsBLycx7Rr4YzUSusSDv1x+VAYWcEApzvAtPxHsZPeGWga5s/ BEMIz+N7hFbJ67wsbPfss4ytSOCzLvXSqwyT/WrLaBQlExETAUaL5tDXfTXfRGPDS2mn DBRuRBgCGhq5ZPRm8YHtHxecboubRf9NnQcnZ7BGa52s2ip8EPVMQd9WJh4rf/ICb/cZ WiQG1Pm1jnH5G+b5qWwWRUJIw+fwjZhHhZV8HMngcK5zthJEbxjJQ247AEZNugH4qhuW hcBPmq32bB3TY46WCuHkAiyepZzbUA5z1IdVGwGzgjAKqlA8m1qZzjIvV7cnittlL+7o PwCw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=OOsO1yI6yK4ZoO7Nd1rXtP9Ojg264/uzGbbIjGUddBA=; b=EttPY+qRtXta0LTGkvcjB3JSurJyd6jflYxTI17Z9dXGal5OAYxZ1UkQoG5nhgNSC6 eGIoCkiXSIPvLXYtUncmlW2GnGYnxisjiQkLcneij9jadZbxztsw7hTZwrQhW5lGdiyW Inpxw5jLdW6wKh/OoKm+Kf4UocJHwHEKCraDWnsNr38dLE9tqqvazI+hUaGqijGFV4CP cVXzf4Wf+Wg6D2qnEGqKFLJOuwj4ZLyASmNwu3NSCOmziXxdzLVtZadhCN4ALjznh0nJ uwZB3NTxdgvARPfUmudEnrOrP/oqcegvqT0Dn5Ki/EhISFF/gizFDgmZ6fSoloaG7yiO sEQw== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/56jCiuLe0Zp8KTmMBSho/n6dPlqm+qEeoxICdL5N3zWrVG2BLq 4BOaJ7WiDXIMVg== X-Received: by 10.223.157.29 with SMTP id k29mr17003861wre.156.1493650855053; Mon, 01 May 2017 08:00:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([185.105.173.156]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id h80sm15930916wmd.7.2017.05.01.08.00.53 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 01 May 2017 08:00:53 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: bug#19343: 25.0.50; [vc-git] Unregistered file becomes `up-to-date' in vc-dir buffer after editing and saving To: Eli Zaretskii References: <86oarbqhh4.fsf@yandex.ru> <86fvchdsw0.fsf@yandex.ru> <867fxqvr1e.fsf@yandex.ru> <861tny9zxc.fsf@yandex.ru> <834msuwagv.fsf@gnu.org> <83lgqhjbms.fsf@gnu.org> From: Dmitry Gutov Message-ID: <3b75f8fb-7cd2-3ade-271c-9523804fd786@yandex.ru> Date: Mon, 1 May 2017 18:00:52 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:53.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/53.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <83lgqhjbms.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 19343 Cc: 19343@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) On 01.05.2017 10:10, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Do we still care about CentOS 6? > > I don't know. According to my references, it will be maintained until > 2021 at least, possibly as late as 2024. If that's true, then yes, we > should care. OK, thanks. I've removed the --ignored flag. Which brings back a related bug with ignored files. Fortunately, ignored files are rarely displayed in vc-dir buffers, so it's less of a problem. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 01 11:15:29 2017 Received: (at 19343) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 May 2017 15:15:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49802 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d5D2v-0002FO-Hg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 May 2017 11:15:29 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41544) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d5D2t-0002FB-VY for 19343@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 May 2017 11:15:28 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d5D2l-0002IS-Pa for 19343@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 May 2017 11:15:22 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:41622) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d5D2l-0002IO-M2; Mon, 01 May 2017 11:15:19 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4619 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1d5D2j-0000A1-Ju; Mon, 01 May 2017 11:15:19 -0400 Date: Mon, 01 May 2017 18:14:44 +0300 Message-Id: <83y3ugip7f.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Dmitry Gutov In-reply-to: <3b75f8fb-7cd2-3ade-271c-9523804fd786@yandex.ru> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Mon, 1 May 2017 18:00:52 +0300) Subject: Re: bug#19343: 25.0.50; [vc-git] Unregistered file becomes `up-to-date' in vc-dir buffer after editing and saving References: <86oarbqhh4.fsf@yandex.ru> <86fvchdsw0.fsf@yandex.ru> <867fxqvr1e.fsf@yandex.ru> <861tny9zxc.fsf@yandex.ru> <834msuwagv.fsf@gnu.org> <83lgqhjbms.fsf@gnu.org> <3b75f8fb-7cd2-3ade-271c-9523804fd786@yandex.ru> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 19343 Cc: 19343@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) > Cc: 19343@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Mon, 1 May 2017 18:00:52 +0300 > > On 01.05.2017 10:10, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > >> Do we still care about CentOS 6? > > > > I don't know. According to my references, it will be maintained until > > 2021 at least, possibly as late as 2024. If that's true, then yes, we > > should care. > > OK, thanks. I've removed the --ignored flag. Which brings back a related > bug with ignored files. I don't think that's what I had in mind. I thought about probing for that flag once, then using it if it's available. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 01 12:55:14 2017 Received: (at 19343) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 May 2017 16:55:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49842 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d5EbR-0004V4-Rf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 May 2017 12:55:13 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:36483) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d5EbQ-0004Up-1z for 19343@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 May 2017 12:55:12 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f44.google.com with SMTP id u65so91540042wmu.1 for <19343@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 01 May 2017 09:55:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=15N70V07nmplO8raYjqHWJR2QQFstZ1LfppccI+Sl20=; b=A1FswYVf6veD+SdXxX4Xnb9tY8H9UqjFaq1slb70rxQ15Gu086njql/Jh9KPMYv8WO jBPEpCsMeXLzQTG5gSs5HanUCm/Lb3DYXYJQi3kPR5T8vsxu+tJWc3LSQ3qSMX0eaoxl 5+ULmdQKeLMsVzjMR/4pyAjt1fN3cho8qj2nIPuvmXm+FfA8qL6dmqpbvWNgAScEqAjU 53E3ju3BQTOLZOeyWyZQEIljwE4feJOwJvT1Pm1Cxw28p3c3HpmzmPLSm025k2QnOF7H 7Oc6CI0506iUuADfvj1Ash3KrtYD1lZlnotycjpCEmwN1ISSuBFXUvZ1szFEdi0XekDp o/bQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=15N70V07nmplO8raYjqHWJR2QQFstZ1LfppccI+Sl20=; b=TU2VC8jwHvnLv9pYNNH5K2I0vZa5XZbzJA11lEGkB8aAgW22+TDsv1DSrJZ9A9PhPm KxDvwFGOuguriv1CwGPn6sEsOrSaRWXo/1G4AQ2e3W/le6MpgR7ZPBUIsdXD4W81De/q mHL/VTMvrfS5zxh4AuByLDM0HVwNFv9HgJZrbu3DlTpuB7ilNVZ2b5GBqUt+9rEJUPnR kEX9RJun9VKiXIdHHZGEl6qZP9VfWIxWSFwIdlcrWl8mHseauXWmSnQ+CVtoE8lI2Sih RwOLKmPrEN5yVVZUgpj9p/9pHfsPL0jC5cS31JOUE4t3d11E2eMg/KZlgt8M5Dk7Gk6h U8dQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/4/dad/JY4eoGm2uRv4o8fNEF8daImTXQnqEu5r5+/kjjQyku2Z cTWA1l/QKH0mFw== X-Received: by 10.28.92.136 with SMTP id q130mr169303wmb.85.1493657706254; Mon, 01 May 2017 09:55:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([185.105.173.156]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id v80sm12790418wmv.4.2017.05.01.09.55.04 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 01 May 2017 09:55:05 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: bug#19343: 25.0.50; [vc-git] Unregistered file becomes `up-to-date' in vc-dir buffer after editing and saving To: Eli Zaretskii References: <86oarbqhh4.fsf@yandex.ru> <86fvchdsw0.fsf@yandex.ru> <867fxqvr1e.fsf@yandex.ru> <861tny9zxc.fsf@yandex.ru> <834msuwagv.fsf@gnu.org> <83lgqhjbms.fsf@gnu.org> <3b75f8fb-7cd2-3ade-271c-9523804fd786@yandex.ru> <83y3ugip7f.fsf@gnu.org> From: Dmitry Gutov Message-ID: <0dd2d7ba-cd69-5068-4fe7-c962a05b6819@yandex.ru> Date: Mon, 1 May 2017 19:55:03 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:53.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/53.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <83y3ugip7f.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 19343 Cc: 19343@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) On 01.05.2017 18:14, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > I don't think that's what I had in mind. I thought about probing for > that flag once, then using it if it's available. Very well, I've added a version check. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 01 15:10:03 2017 Received: (at 19343) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 May 2017 19:10:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49924 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d5Ghv-00013t-7q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 May 2017 15:10:03 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44249) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d5Ght-00013M-RP for 19343@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 May 2017 15:10:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d5Ghl-0007kc-Gk for 19343@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 May 2017 15:09:56 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:45523) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d5Ghl-0007kX-DC; Mon, 01 May 2017 15:09:53 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4813 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1d5Ghk-0008G1-NI; Mon, 01 May 2017 15:09:53 -0400 Date: Mon, 01 May 2017 22:09:45 +0300 Message-Id: <83tw54iebq.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Dmitry Gutov In-reply-to: <0dd2d7ba-cd69-5068-4fe7-c962a05b6819@yandex.ru> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Mon, 1 May 2017 19:55:03 +0300) Subject: Re: bug#19343: 25.0.50; [vc-git] Unregistered file becomes `up-to-date' in vc-dir buffer after editing and saving References: <86oarbqhh4.fsf@yandex.ru> <86fvchdsw0.fsf@yandex.ru> <867fxqvr1e.fsf@yandex.ru> <861tny9zxc.fsf@yandex.ru> <834msuwagv.fsf@gnu.org> <83lgqhjbms.fsf@gnu.org> <3b75f8fb-7cd2-3ade-271c-9523804fd786@yandex.ru> <83y3ugip7f.fsf@gnu.org> <0dd2d7ba-cd69-5068-4fe7-c962a05b6819@yandex.ru> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 19343 Cc: 19343@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) > Cc: 19343@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Mon, 1 May 2017 19:55:03 +0300 > > On 01.05.2017 18:14, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > I don't think that's what I had in mind. I thought about probing for > > that flag once, then using it if it's available. > > Very well, I've added a version check. Great, thanks! From unknown Fri Aug 15 12:53:56 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 11:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator