Subject: Re: bug#19325: file-tree-walk needs to be replaced/removed

From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 07:52:31 +0100

Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <[email-masked]> writes:

> I haven't actually looked, but I mean that what it does is so trivial
> that it's not worth having as a separate function.

It's not used, and there's already a `vc-file-tree-walk' that does a
similar thing, but with a less moronic interface.  Only over vc-covered
files, though.

I say nuke `file-tree-walk'.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no