Subject: Re: bug#19325: file-tree-walk needs to be replaced/removed

From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 07:44:57 +0100

Glenn Morris <[email-masked]> writes:

> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote:
>
>> `file-tree-walk' can be implemented as
>>
>> (mapcar 'function (directory-files-recursively ...)) if you want, but it
>> seems kinda superfluous.
>
> Oh, nothing actually uses f-t-w?

I haven't actually looked, but I mean that what it does is so trivial
that it's not worth having as a separate function.

People should just mapc over `directory-files-recursively'.  

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no