Subject: Re: bug#19325: file-tree-walk needs to be replaced/removed

From: Glenn Morris <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 01:38:10 -0500

Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote:

> `file-tree-walk' can be implemented as
>
> (mapcar 'function (directory-files-recursively ...)) if you want, but it
> seems kinda superfluous.

Oh, nothing actually uses f-t-w?

Then if no-one objects feel free to nuke it, I think. (And the NEWS and doc.)
Thanks!