GNU bug report logs - #19219
Package names with digits following dashes

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 19219 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Mathieu Lirzin <mthl <at> gnu.org>, Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
Subject: bug#19219: New command-line syntax for package + version?
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2016 16:25:40 -0500

On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 04:55:40PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> skribis:
> 
> > On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 20:16:31 -0500
> > Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name> wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 11:45:14PM +0100, Mathieu Lirzin wrote:
> >>  [...]  
> >>  [...]  
> >>  [...]  
> >>  [...]  
> >>  [...]  
> >>  [...]  
> >> > 
> >> > I'm OK with that.  Since choosing the reserved characters is not a
> >> > technical decision, maybe we could poll users?  
> >> 
> >> I think we should poll a big list of packages and see which characters
> >> are most safe to use.
> >> 
> >> The question is: which big list? Debian's?
> >> 
> >> 
> >  
> > When debian adopted multiarch 
> 
> [...]
> 
> I forgot to reply to Leo’s message, but it seems clear to me that it
> only makes sense to discuss on Guix mailing lists.  I don’t think anyone
> else cares about the syntax of Guix’s command-line interface.  ;-)

I don't mean that we should discuss it on Debian's mailing list. I mean
that we should consult the largest list of packages that we can find in
order to learn which characters are safest to choose as reserved. Debian
has a very long list of packages.

> 
> Ludo’.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.