Subject: Re: bug#19148: ls --inode --sort=inode

From: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 09:28:38 +0800

>>>>> "EB" == Eric Blake <[email-masked]> writes:
EB> I guess it would be okay to have a long option with no short-option
EB> counterpart; it would look a bit awkward in the help text, but we could
EB> figure something out.

I thought that is why there was a separate --sort, just for those
cases... Ah.. Oh.. OK.

Anyway Pádraig, my usage case was **secret** (so dumb as to make this
bug report INVALID, so I'm not revealing it!)