GNU bug report logs -
#18945
Parallel compilation with jobs >= 12 fails on DOT_I_FILES
Previous Next
Reported by: aszlig <aszlig <at> redmoonstudios.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 16:40:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: aszlig <aszlig <at> redmoonstudios.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 18945 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 18945 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-guile <at> gnu.org
:
bug#18945
; Package
guile
.
(Tue, 04 Nov 2014 16:40:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
aszlig <aszlig <at> redmoonstudios.org>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-guile <at> gnu.org
.
(Tue, 04 Nov 2014 16:40:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi,
It seems that the DOT_I_FILES in libguile/Makefile.am are missing
explicit dependency information and thus are prone to race conditions
during parallel builds.
See build log at:
https://headcounter.org/hydra/build/581960/nixlog/11/raw
And discussion here:
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/1e4e719ffba3cb90481eb71f29b48b197c50a2d3#commitcomment-8420579
a!
--
aszlig
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guile <at> gnu.org
:
bug#18945
; Package
guile
.
(Wed, 22 Jun 2016 11:29:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 18945 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi :)
On Tue 04 Nov 2014 11:50, aszlig <aszlig <at> redmoonstudios.org> writes:
> It seems that the DOT_I_FILES in libguile/Makefile.am are missing
> explicit dependency information and thus are prone to race conditions
> during parallel builds.
>
> See build log at:
>
> https://headcounter.org/hydra/build/581960/nixlog/11/raw
>
> And discussion here:
>
> https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/1e4e719ffba3cb90481eb71f29b48b197c50a2d3#commitcomment-8420579
How would this work? The .deps includes a dependency e.g. of
libguile_2.0_la-instructions.lo on vm-i-system.i. That should be
sufficient, no? Is it not guaranteed that .deps are there or something?
Andy
Information forwarded
to
bug-guile <at> gnu.org
:
bug#18945
; Package
guile
.
(Wed, 22 Jun 2016 13:13:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 18945 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 01:28:33PM +0200, Andy Wingo wrote:
> How would this work? The .deps includes a dependency e.g. of
> libguile_2.0_la-instructions.lo on vm-i-system.i. That should be
> sufficient, no? Is it not guaranteed that .deps are there or
> something?
I have no idea, because I have reported that bug in 2014 and things
might have changed in-between in addition to me forgetting about the
specifics of this bug.
So I guess this bug can be closed and I'll reopen a new bug if it
happens again.
a!
--
aszlig
Universal dilettante
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
bug closed, send any further explanations to
18945 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and aszlig <aszlig <at> redmoonstudios.org>
Request was from
aszlig <aszlig <at> redmoonstudios.org>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Wed, 22 Jun 2016 13:16:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guile <at> gnu.org
:
bug#18945
; Package
guile
.
(Wed, 22 Jun 2016 13:34:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #16 received at 18945-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Yeah, our bad for not striking while the iron was hot. Let's pick this
up again when/if we can reproduce it :)
Cheers,
Andy
On Wed 22 Jun 2016 15:12, aszlig <aszlig <at> redmoonstudios.org> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 01:28:33PM +0200, Andy Wingo wrote:
>> How would this work? The .deps includes a dependency e.g. of
>> libguile_2.0_la-instructions.lo on vm-i-system.i. That should be
>> sufficient, no? Is it not guaranteed that .deps are there or
>> something?
>
> I have no idea, because I have reported that bug in 2014 and things
> might have changed in-between in addition to me forgetting about the
> specifics of this bug.
>
> So I guess this bug can be closed and I'll reopen a new bug if it
> happens again.
>
> a!
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Thu, 21 Jul 2016 11:24:04 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 9 years and 54 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.