From unknown Mon Jun 23 04:11:20 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#18843 <18843@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#18843 <18843@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: Invalid block indentation in Python mode Reply-To: bug#18843 <18843@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 11:11:20 +0000 retitle 18843 Invalid block indentation in Python mode reassign 18843 emacs submitter 18843 Paul Pogonyshev severity 18843 normal tag 18843 patch thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 26 10:18:19 2014 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Oct 2014 14:18:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36062 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XiOeB-0003VR-3n for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 10:18:19 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59944) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XiOe9-0003VB-1i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 10:18:17 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XiOe2-0006ME-QB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 10:18:11 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:46696) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XiOe2-0006MA-Nz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 10:18:10 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33431) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XiOe1-0001t4-UH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 10:18:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XiOe1-0006Lu-0K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 10:18:09 -0400 Received: from mail-ig0-x236.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c05::236]:59302) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XiOe0-0006Lq-Pm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 10:18:08 -0400 Received: by mail-ig0-f182.google.com with SMTP id hn18so3896533igb.15 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 07:18:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=9HIYj2gKpNhSyZHfMe3fBTzMSkbvLVeb9NYxdoxDE7k=; b=fTBCaYsfg/UnDTLmumZkgHLo/gXtZ2rGX3TlH/hCGEWKZZ394V+7JM9CENtgU+Vf5W XCyyGOX1sbhbhCA4YqB0w05QwhuUNWYOsySeAsQ3LK4rCVl/Ml0tRoZK5EyFxBMLrYLu ju/wVGtpbd3wKFFpr4hEvj+OMiKZqI8ov2+5fcXsYUo8bAkizfKmjobWPaaPefTyjkst mQRFAwNa0xFkZ/xkRPZzcSBgeQeHufGFDxzr8TPtr8lNdgr5wXtPjbPaFuJMCqoAjWOL Wja1I4VKxWgdpB9qkly9BAqMI6bSqqIGBARF+/zigXqqpqEx4K+tEOmb973REdA9OAhg JHzg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.8.213 with SMTP id h82mr881416ioi.84.1414333088057; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 07:18:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.83.141 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 07:18:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 15:18:08 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Invalid block indentation in Python mode From: Paul Pogonyshev To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113f99344ed05b0506541534 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) --001a113f99344ed05b0506541534 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Block indentation in Python mode often gives silly results. For example, with 'emacs -q' create a Python buffer and type this: def foo (): try: pass except: pass Now 'C-x h TAB' gives something that is not valid at all: def foo (): try: pass except: pass Note that if you go to the 'except:' line and press 'TAB', 'except:' is indented back to its proper position. Further 'TAB's don't change this, i.e. mode understands that it cannot place 'except:' at any other indentation level. Emacs version (just compiled): GNU Emacs 25.0.50.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.10.9) of 2014-10-26 Paul --001a113f99344ed05b0506541534 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Block indentation in Python mode often gives sil= ly results. For example, with 'emacs -q' create a Python buffer and= type this:

def foo ():
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 try:
=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 pass
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 except:
=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 pass

Now 'C-x h TAB&#= 39; gives something that is not valid at all:

def foo ():
=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0 try:
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 pass
exc= ept:
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 pass

Note that if you go to th= e 'except:' line and press 'TAB', 'except:' is inde= nted back to its proper position. Further 'TAB's don't change t= his, i.e. mode understands that it cannot place 'except:' at any ot= her indentation level.

Emacs version (just compiled):
= GNU Emacs 25.0.50.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.10.9) of 2014= -10-26

Paul
--001a113f99344ed05b0506541534-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Oct 30 15:14:12 2014 Received: (at 18843) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Oct 2014 19:14:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40836 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XjvAh-0004YU-Nr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 15:14:12 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-f173.google.com ([209.85.217.173]:47250) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XjvAf-0004YC-IC for 18843@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 15:14:10 -0400 Received: by mail-lb0-f173.google.com with SMTP id l4so4946120lbv.18 for <18843@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 12:14:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=RG/NeC70Y9Y/7101csXdmhiqeDH8/N8vm9a7hiUcibw=; b=zHWL5nXqi3+ltKV3dvcMd0hKVc4Ni+UGCL+vFsYPTICmkp/J30XZJyc5BdEPVGrL4c v4DI0BQEitd7LiTBI8EpLHgUZ83j8rIsmRcEudTtfqviqbr/33mVwSe18JE8/Q/DwX7j qgk+h9cqaUwx2Fp4JiJBHXXciCFsXCSS5mWnEmjrZ1r443K+k1LkB6sxgYvJi2C5ARJ2 b51uaOKhd0GcPclnyx6N61eFkNNJY242A/TZBihI//aTu8aCI3xTebbzwLWfDboZswbw NrxoRNzgWsWHoN7oHzm2fms8mqRuK0GWBHh142JcT58RYG+DtPPPvt3Y7iCMgX77rsW3 XPOQ== X-Received: by 10.152.30.9 with SMTP id o9mr21272468lah.8.1414696429463; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 12:13:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.252.101 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 12:13:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Carlos Pita Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 16:13:29 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: To: 18843@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: This is a duplicate of my own report #18796. Take a look at that report for a very simple fix. Hope it gets commited soon. [...] Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (carlosjosepita[at]gmail.com) -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.217.173 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 18843 Cc: fgallina@gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: This is a duplicate of my own report #18796. Take a look at that report for a very simple fix. Hope it gets commited soon. [...] Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.217.173 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (carlosjosepita[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid This is a duplicate of my own report #18796. Take a look at that report for a very simple fix. Hope it gets commited soon. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Oct 31 12:38:36 2014 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Oct 2014 16:38:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41430 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XkFDg-0005zh-5J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 12:38:36 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:53863 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XkFDd-0005zU-W0 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 12:38:34 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XkFDd-0003jw-61 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 12:38:33 -0400 Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 12:38:33 -0400 Message-Id: Subject: control message for bug 18843 To: X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 2.1) From: Glenn Morris X-Spam-Score: -5.6 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.6 (-----) merge 18432 18796 18843 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 05 15:35:39 2014 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Nov 2014 20:35:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50458 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xm7Ip-0000mR-8I for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 15:35:39 -0500 Received: from mail-la0-f48.google.com ([209.85.215.48]:49649) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xm7In-0000mH-Kk for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 15:35:38 -0500 Received: by mail-la0-f48.google.com with SMTP id gq15so1400221lab.21 for ; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 12:35:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=SOhb0ZN0aDInSQZ1UgL97NYFdSUYFuZM1qqSZT0jDn0=; b=xzwJTcbJTMF4ncMIOOnH+dXDSk35Tw/ha4EM0sEn095BRfRB/as5LRel0/WEi/dTVk u9qKj47j9wD1z+yRIYXQCxxwoAzb3UDysgeRSYIZ2/e/OJV5EeJDfNit+Qs9m0nq7KxZ L86KKPKH2CFTCgw0sPw0p+QJkxITqUOg0F16XYl/mjON5pFhsQVMGk0dS/7CgmuEBBr7 cpgEf5sc3D3i545IWI6YwsQEeb3jWl5qBQV6CRwTFaBFeiqMUJTmL3CNZBGmWmfvtiYJ D5IvlUMeg7lSs1tPVVMyFnmv4S/JssrLHCME6WxRYwxqd6CVCQ47mnkeRkxSd+kK4dRa E8zw== X-Received: by 10.112.202.104 with SMTP id kh8mr8946076lbc.46.1415219736652; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 12:35:36 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.252.101 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 12:35:16 -0800 (PST) From: Carlos Pita Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 17:35:16 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: tags 18796 patch [...] Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (carlosjosepita[at]gmail.com) -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.215.48 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: tags 18796 patch [...] Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.215.48 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (carlosjosepita[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid tags 18796 patch From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Nov 15 16:16:48 2014 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Nov 2014 21:16:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34157 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xpki8-0002zq-9W for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 16:16:48 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:55811) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xpki6-0002zj-Pl for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 16:16:47 -0500 Received: from [190.246.172.180] (port=39190 helo=localhost) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xpki5-00050u-Th for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 16:16:46 -0500 From: fgallina@gnu.org (=?utf-8?Q?Fabi=C3=A1n?= Ezequiel Gallina) To: GNU bug tracker automated control server Subject: Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 18:16:42 -0300 Message-ID: <877fyw5flx.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) unmerge 18843 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Nov 15 16:21:26 2014 Received: (at 18843-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Nov 2014 21:21:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34161 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xpkmb-00037R-RL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 16:21:26 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:55859) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xpkma-00037J-7F for 18843-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 16:21:24 -0500 Received: from [190.246.172.180] (port=39218 helo=localhost) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XpkmZ-000663-KC for 18843-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 16:21:24 -0500 From: fgallina@gnu.org (=?utf-8?Q?Fabi=C3=A1n?= Ezequiel Gallina) To: 18843-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Invalid block indentation in Python mode Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 18:21:22 -0300 Message-ID: <87389k5fe5.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 18843-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Fixed at 89ebffc in the emacs-24 branch. `python-indent-region` region now follows saner approach, it uses `python-indent-line` and skips special cases: namely block starts, enders and dedenters. The idea is that those mark the base indentation and stuff within them could be re-indented. I tested this approach in few large codebases and the results are quite promising, in fact I found several bad indented stuff thanks to this. PS: I unmerged this from #18796, it's not really the same thing. Thanks for the report, Fabi=C3=A1n From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Nov 15 16:33:46 2014 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Nov 2014 21:33:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34171 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XpkyX-0004lh-RR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 16:33:46 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:56001) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XpkyW-0004lZ-8W for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 16:33:44 -0500 Received: from [190.246.172.180] (port=39302 helo=localhost) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XpkyV-0008Bk-Cz for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 16:33:43 -0500 From: fgallina@gnu.org (=?utf-8?Q?Fabi=C3=A1n?= Ezequiel Gallina) To: GNU bug tracker automated control server Subject: Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 18:33:40 -0300 Message-ID: <877fywno7f.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) close 18796 merge 18796 18843 From unknown Mon Jun 23 04:11:20 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2014 12:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator