GNU bug report logs -
#18840
24.4; nt/README.W32: obsolete snippet
Previous Next
Reported by: Dani Moncayo <dmoncayo <at> gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 09:48:02 UTC
Severity: minor
Found in version 24.4
Done: Dani Moncayo <dmoncayo <at> gmail.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 18840 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 18840 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#18840
; Package
emacs
.
(Sun, 26 Oct 2014 09:48:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Dani Moncayo <dmoncayo <at> gmail.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
.
(Sun, 26 Oct 2014 09:48:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
This snipped from the file nt/README.W32:
-------------------------
* Preliminaries
Along with this file should be four subdirectories (bin, libexec,
share, and var).
-------------------------
is obsolete, since now this file is placed under
'share/emacs/VERSION/' on the binary distribution.
So, it should be either reworded or removed.
In GNU Emacs 24.4.1 (i686-pc-mingw32)
of 2014-10-20 on LEG570
Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 6.3.9600
Important settings:
value of $LANG: ENU
locale-coding-system: cp1252
--
Dani Moncayo
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#18840
; Package
emacs
.
(Sun, 26 Oct 2014 16:05:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 18840 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 10:47:36 +0100
> From: Dani Moncayo <dmoncayo <at> gmail.com>
>
> This snipped from the file nt/README.W32:
> -------------------------
> * Preliminaries
>
> Along with this file should be four subdirectories (bin, libexec,
> share, and var).
> -------------------------
> is obsolete, since now this file is placed under
> 'share/emacs/VERSION/' on the binary distribution.
>
> So, it should be either reworded or removed.
Actually, I think that file should be manually copied to the top-level
directory, after "make install" finishes. Otherwise, the probability
of it being discovered by users is probably close to zero.
Thanks.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#18840
; Package
emacs
.
(Sun, 26 Oct 2014 16:50:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 18840 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
>> This snipped from the file nt/README.W32:
>> -------------------------
>> * Preliminaries
>>
>> Along with this file should be four subdirectories (bin, libexec,
>> share, and var).
>> -------------------------
>> is obsolete, since now this file is placed under
>> 'share/emacs/VERSION/' on the binary distribution.
>>
>> So, it should be either reworded or removed.
>
> Actually, I think that file should be manually copied to the top-level
> directory, after "make install" finishes. Otherwise, the probability
> of it being discovered by users is probably close to zero.
That's a possibility, but I think we also should:
* Reword that section to make it independent of the location of the
README.W32 file (the current wording is not valid for the copy in
'share/emacs/VERSION').
* Tell the user _not_ to copy the top-level README.W32 when setting up
his/her Emacs setup (individual packages should not pollute the top
level directory).
For example, something along these lines:
=== modified file 'nt/README.W32'
--- nt/README.W32 2014-10-09 00:47:30 +0000
+++ nt/README.W32 2014-10-26 16:33:39 +0000
@@ -21,12 +21,19 @@
* Preliminaries
- Along with this file should be four subdirectories (bin, libexec,
- share, and var).
+ The binary distribution has these top-level directories:
+
+ + bin: <explain briefly its contents>
+
+ + libexec: <explain briefly its contents>
+
+ + share: <explain briefly its contents>
+
+ + var: <explain briefly its contents>
* Setting up Emacs
- To install Emacs, simply unpack all the files into a directory of
+ To install Emacs, simply unpack the top-level directories into a directory of
your choice. To complete the installation process, you can
optionally run the program addpm.exe in the bin subdirectory. This
will put an icon for Emacs in the Start Menu under
--
Dani Moncayo
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#18840
; Package
emacs
.
(Sun, 26 Oct 2014 17:18:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 18840 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 17:49:39 +0100
> From: Dani Moncayo <dmoncayo <at> gmail.com>
> Cc: 18840 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>
> - Along with this file should be four subdirectories (bin, libexec,
> - share, and var).
> + The binary distribution has these top-level directories:
> +
> + + bin: <explain briefly its contents>
> +
> + + libexec: <explain briefly its contents>
> +
> + + share: <explain briefly its contents>
> +
> + + var: <explain briefly its contents>
This is OK (and I don't think we must describe the contents of each
subdirectory, but I will certainly not object to it).
> * Setting up Emacs
>
> - To install Emacs, simply unpack all the files into a directory of
> + To install Emacs, simply unpack the top-level directories into a directory of
> your choice.
None of this is accurate. Instead, we should say
To install Emacs, simply unpack the binary zip into a directory of
your choice.
Thanks.
Reply sent
to
Dani Moncayo <dmoncayo <at> gmail.com>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Sun, 26 Oct 2014 17:56:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Dani Moncayo <dmoncayo <at> gmail.com>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Sun, 26 Oct 2014 17:56:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #19 received at 18840-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
>> - Along with this file should be four subdirectories (bin, libexec,
>> - share, and var).
>> + The binary distribution has these top-level directories:
>> +
>> + + bin: <explain briefly its contents>
>> +
>> + + libexec: <explain briefly its contents>
>> +
>> + + share: <explain briefly its contents>
>> +
>> + + var: <explain briefly its contents>
>
> This is OK (and I don't think we must describe the contents of each
> subdirectory, but I will certainly not object to it).
Ok. (I didn't describe them because I wouldn't know how, especially
with "share" and "var").
>> * Setting up Emacs
>>
>> - To install Emacs, simply unpack all the files into a directory of
>> + To install Emacs, simply unpack the top-level directories into a directory of
>> your choice.
>
> None of this is accurate. Instead, we should say
>
> To install Emacs, simply unpack the binary zip into a directory of
> your choice.
Ok. (I changed "zip" with "package" to make it more neutral wrt the
compression format)
Committed & closing this bug.
Thank you.
--
Dani Moncayo
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#18840
; Package
emacs
.
(Sun, 26 Oct 2014 18:06:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #22 received at 18840 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Committed & closing this bug.
I've just realized that this should have gone to emacs-24, not the
trunk. Sorry.
(I could back port this to emacs-24 is someone tell me how, or what
doc to read).
--
Dani Moncayo
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#18840
; Package
emacs
.
(Sun, 26 Oct 2014 18:26:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #25 received at 18840 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 19:05:32 +0100
> From: Dani Moncayo <dmoncayo <at> gmail.com>
>
> > Committed & closing this bug.
>
> I've just realized that this should have gone to emacs-24, not the
> trunk. Sorry.
>
> (I could back port this to emacs-24 is someone tell me how, or what
> doc to read).
You could simply apply the diffs, it's no big deal in this case.
If you want bzr to do the job for you, then the following will do it:
cd emacs-24 && bzr merge -r 118218..118219 ../trunk
Then "bzr ci" as usual, but please be sure to say in the commit
message that this was "backported from trunk", so that the next merge
from emacs-24 to the trunk will skip this commit.
Thanks.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#18840
; Package
emacs
.
(Sun, 26 Oct 2014 18:41:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #28 received at 18840 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
>> (I could back port this to emacs-24 is someone tell me how, or what
>> doc to read).
>
> You could simply apply the diffs, it's no big deal in this case.
>
> If you want bzr to do the job for you, then the following will do it:
>
> cd emacs-24 && bzr merge -r 118218..118219 ../trunk
>
> Then "bzr ci" as usual, but please be sure to say in the commit
> message that this was "backported from trunk", so that the next merge
> from emacs-24 to the trunk will skip this commit.
Done & thank you.
--
Dani Moncayo
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Mon, 24 Nov 2014 12:24:04 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 10 years and 214 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.