GNU bug report logs - #18807
seq does not play nice with large 64 bit integers

Previous Next

Package: coreutils;

Reported by: Thaddaeus Frogley <thaddaeus <at> bossalien.com>

Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 13:18:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: notabug

Done: Pádraig Brady <P <at> draigBrady.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #18 received at 18807 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Pádraig Brady <P <at> draigBrady.com>
To: Thaddaeus Frogley <thaddaeus <at> bossalien.com>
Cc: 18807 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#18807: seq does not play nice with large 64 bit integers
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 15:29:33 +0100
On 10/23/2014 03:15 PM, Thaddaeus Frogley wrote:
> Hi Padraig,
> 
> You say "quite a while".
> 
> This issue was found in: coreutils-8.23_1

Oh, it should have been fixed from release 8.20 (2012-10-23)

> 
> Installed on OS X using brew.
> 
> Pulling the current source I can see there have been several releases since then, but a git diff / log doesn't seem to produce any relevant changes, i.e.:
> 
> git diff v8.23.. -- src/seq.c
> 
> 
> Are you *sure* that this range in particular doesn't reproduce in the latest?

Yes. That range triggers the fast string manipulation code here.
It's very surprising it doesn't there.

I see that seq is on OS X:
https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/documentation/Darwin/Reference/ManPages/man1/seq.1.html
So please ensure you're not using the native seq, and rather gseq

If still an issue, you'd need to debug it further there
as I've not got access to OS X here.

thanks,
Pádraig.





This bug report was last modified 10 years and 212 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.