From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 20 15:17:43 2014 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Oct 2014 19:17:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57486 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XgISc-0003r0-Kk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 15:17:43 -0400 Received: from fely.am-1.org ([78.47.74.50]:36860) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XgISZ-0003qm-4R for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 15:17:40 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=siamics.net; s=a2013295; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:Sender:References:Subject:To:From; bh=z1xFUzk73IHSPZ+pynY2+uOZ2UufyMvtrFePCEGjyWs=; b=Mh1Z0M9YRkhxRXAe/VK7+sOro/t6RROc6X4tooUB3Mc/Zo+5RKHVerufMcPT1FimHFRb1MAei7N4uu8dVhjahHJPscRhWGrbJtTTVRxtelyG1rXjF2r4bnB01IgKK6Q8purh+C/K95cVf0fne/aP932/YOR1o/gMrZmo/ua7ISk=; Received: from [2a02:2560:6d4:26ca::1:1d] (helo=violet.siamics.net) by fely.am-1.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XgISX-0008V1-NW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 19:17:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=violet.siamics.net) by violet.siamics.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XgISQ-00011e-4b for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 02:17:30 +0700 From: Ivan Shmakov To: submit@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: noticeable slowdown for buffers with long lines, word-wrap, and brackets References: <834mv55quj.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 19:17:28 +0000 In-Reply-To: <834mv55quj.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 15 Oct 2014 17:51:00 +0300") Message-ID: <87wq7ur1o7.fsf@violet.siamics.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) Package: emacs X-Debbugs-Cc: Eli Zaretskii >>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes: [=E2=80=A6] > In addition, one of the new UBA features, the so-called Bidirectional > Parentheses Algorithm (BPA), affects pure-ASCII text as well, and > specifically editing of program sources (which widely use parentheses > and brackets of several kinds). > The result is some small slowdown -- a few percents in my testing -- > in redisplay operations. If more significant slowdown will be > reported in some special cases, I will try to find optimizations to > countermand that. It seems that I=E2=80=99ve just found such a case for 13a3ad6b39c0. To reproduce: =E2=80=A2 create a buffer with long lines (see below for the example I=E2=80=99ve used), and (setq word-wrap t line-move-visual nil) there; =E2=80=A2 now, enclose every line in [, ] brackets (as in: M-x replace-regexp RET .* RET [\&] RET; parentheses or curly braces also exhibit the issue.) For the resulting buffer, operations like (next-line) or even (recenter) now result in a noticeable delay. The issue doesn=E2=80=99t appear when word-wrap is not used, or when there=E2=80=99s no brackets in the buffer. Neither the issue appears in Emacs built 2014-10-09 from a then-recent Git clone. I=E2=80=99ve used the output of the following Shell command as a test. $ head -n 8192 < /usr/share/dict/american-english | fmt -w 1024=20 [=E2=80=A6] --=20 FSF associate member #7257 http://boycottsystemd.org/ =E2=80=A6 3013 B6A0= 230E 334A From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 20 15:33:32 2014 Received: (at 18778) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Oct 2014 19:33:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57491 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XgIhv-0004G9-Aa for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 15:33:31 -0400 Received: from mtaout28.012.net.il ([80.179.55.184]:48599) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XgIhr-0004Fh-Or for 18778@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 15:33:29 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout28.012.net.il by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NDR00900CR1OB00@mtaout28.012.net.il> for 18778@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 22:31:25 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NDR006LFCWDPE30@mtaout28.012.net.il>; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 22:31:25 +0300 (IDT) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 22:33:12 +0300 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#18778: noticeable slowdown for buffers with long lines, word-wrap, and brackets In-reply-to: <87wq7ur1o7.fsf@violet.siamics.net> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Ivan Shmakov Message-id: <83k33ubkp3.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT References: <834mv55quj.fsf@gnu.org> <87wq7ur1o7.fsf@violet.siamics.net> X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 18778 Cc: 18778@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) > From: Ivan Shmakov > Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 19:17:28 +0000 > > • create a buffer with long lines (see below for the example > I’ve used), and (setq word-wrap t line-move-visual nil) there; > > • now, enclose every line in [, ] brackets (as in: M-x > replace-regexp RET .* RET [\&] RET; parentheses or curly > braces also exhibit the issue.) > > For the resulting buffer, operations like (next-line) or even > (recenter) now result in a noticeable delay. > > The issue doesn’t appear when word-wrap is not used, or when > there’s no brackets in the buffer. Neither the issue appears in > Emacs built 2014-10-09 from a then-recent Git clone. > > I’ve used the output of the following Shell command as a test. > > $ head -n 8192 < /usr/share/dict/american-english | fmt -w 1024 Is it an important use case? If so, what is the real-life situation here? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 20 15:51:45 2014 Received: (at 18778) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Oct 2014 19:51:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57504 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XgIzY-0004jS-W7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 15:51:45 -0400 Received: from fely.am-1.org ([78.47.74.50]:36873) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XgIzT-0004jH-4B for 18778@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 15:51:43 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=siamics.net; s=a2013295; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Sender:References:Subject:To:From; bh=23xiLOlvbyffmJY7E9QNzSHzIh86rUgb3+4/Q06BcXU=; b=ZVHfajWRPStJ/DXUAH4jfnmYkltAlw+0+zhdye7pXY6bgN7eh5syN3ok4/RVx5lxcZfil4U4jxgyxvnsOPDtYwtj+w3l3asm/ZhzTe1UXeH+TYwb1Vlu9gJAocklmsD6F0cMEJSSYB1+buGl/mAgRlpSIsKGsbaKU67YBe/SjHs=; Received: from [2a02:2560:6d4:26ca::1:1d] (helo=violet.siamics.net) by fely.am-1.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XgIzR-0000TA-Ke for 18778@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 19:51:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=violet.siamics.net) by violet.siamics.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XgIzK-00014z-Kq for 18778@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 02:51:30 +0700 From: Ivan Shmakov To: 18778@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#18778: noticeable slowdown for buffers with long lines, word-wrap, and brackets References: <834mv55quj.fsf@gnu.org> <87wq7ur1o7.fsf@violet.siamics.net> <83k33ubkp3.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 19:51:29 +0000 Message-ID: <87lhoar03i.fsf@violet.siamics.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 18778 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes: >>>>> From: Ivan Shmakov [=E2=80=A6] >> For the resulting buffer, operations like (next-line) or even >> (recenter) now result in a noticeable delay. >> The issue doesn=E2=80=99t appear when word-wrap is not used, or when th= ere=E2=80=99s >> no brackets in the buffer. Neither the issue appears in Emacs built >> 2014-10-09 from a then-recent Git clone. >> I=E2=80=99ve used the output of the following Shell command as a test. >> $ head -n 8192 < /usr/share/dict/american-english | fmt -w 1024 > Is it an important use case? Is there any example of content for which using word-wrap would be reasonable, but which will never ever contain any braces? > If so, what is the real-life situation here? For one thing, MediaWiki (as in: Wikipedia) pages tend to use paragraph-long lines, and (just as any other human-readable text usually does) they use various braces more than occasionally; not to mention using [, ], {, } for the markup purposes. (A few initial lines of the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emacs page source are MIMEd.) Using word-wrap when editing such pages is also more or less an obvious measure. (Now, for sure, I can try to mass-edit the pages I=E2=80=99m interested in to fit in 80 columns, but I doubt such a move would receive a warm welcome from the community.) --=20 FSF associate member #7257 http://boycottsystemd.org/ =E2=80=A6 3013 B6A0= 230E 334A --=-=-= Content-Type: text/mediawiki; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable {{Distinguish|eMac}} [[File:Emacs Dired buffers.png|thumb|Editing multiple [[Dired]] buffers in = [[GNU Emacs]]]] '''Emacs''' {{IPAc-en|=CB=88|i=CB=90|m|=C3=A6|k|s}} and its derivatives are= a family of [[text editor]]s that are characterized by their [[extensibili= ty]]. The manual for the most widely-used variant, [[GNU Emacs]], describes= it as "the extensible, customizable, self-documenting, real-time display e= ditor".{{cite web|title=3DGNU Emacs Manual|url=3Dhttps://www.gnu.org/s= oftware/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/index.html|work=3DGNU Emacs Manual|pub= lisher=3DFSF|accessdate=3D24 November 2012}} Development of the firs= t Emacs began in the mid-1970s and continues actively {{as of|2014|lc=3Don}= }. Emacs has over 2,000 built-in commands and allows the user to combine th= ese commands into [[macro (computer science)|macros]] to automate work. The= use of [[Emacs Lisp]], a variant of the [[Lisp (programming language)|Lisp= ]] programming language, provides a deep extension capability. --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 22 12:12:15 2014 Received: (at 18778) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Oct 2014 16:12:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59982 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XgyWE-0003XN-Vq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 12:12:15 -0400 Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:41997) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XgyWC-0003X8-3H for 18778@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 12:12:13 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NDU00F00SXPDR00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for 18778@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 19:12:05 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NDU00F75T059B70@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 19:12:05 +0300 (IDT) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 19:12:02 +0300 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#18778: noticeable slowdown for buffers with long lines, word-wrap, and brackets In-reply-to: <87lhoar03i.fsf@violet.siamics.net> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Ivan Shmakov Message-id: <83oat484od.fsf@gnu.org> References: <834mv55quj.fsf@gnu.org> <87wq7ur1o7.fsf@violet.siamics.net> <83k33ubkp3.fsf@gnu.org> <87lhoar03i.fsf@violet.siamics.net> X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 18778 Cc: 18778@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) In trunk revision 118179 I introduced an optimization that fixes these situations. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 22 13:07:25 2014 Received: (at 18778) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Oct 2014 17:07:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60092 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XgzNd-0004zc-6r for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 13:07:25 -0400 Received: from fely.am-1.org ([78.47.74.50]:37093) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XgzNa-0004zS-Qz for 18778@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 13:07:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=siamics.net; s=a2013295; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Sender:References:Subject:To:From; bh=Hzd96QRGCCxQQxKZez0m5DPouuF62a3ASGi46j/0M5I=; b=PRcjQjSjmoLLRekZPBHyc/mKeoJVBqf1mMKHSgi3Z4Nl8FsmjoxiA/1zvSqXjFFywfr+D53PK4ynhfp7zph3ZzBSfCWzIq1qfqhTBr8a7ZfsTHl6N1/f0me/s2NUZEhaOLrw//kGZUd29M66v7cvY1uzVM4Ot60caqTHRqMQmSo=; Received: from [2a02:2560:6d4:26ca::1:1d] (helo=violet.siamics.net) by fely.am-1.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XgzNZ-0000Iw-0L for 18778@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 17:07:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=violet.siamics.net) by violet.siamics.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XgzNR-0004tn-Tp for 18778@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 00:07:14 +0700 From: Ivan Shmakov To: 18778@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#18778: noticeable slowdown for buffers with long lines, word-wrap, and brackets References: <834mv55quj.fsf@gnu.org> <87wq7ur1o7.fsf@violet.siamics.net> <83k33ubkp3.fsf@gnu.org> <87lhoar03i.fsf@violet.siamics.net> <83oat484od.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 17:07:13 +0000 Message-ID: <878uk8owxq.fsf@violet.siamics.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 18778 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) >>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes: > In trunk revision 118179 I introduced an optimization that fixes > these situations. ACK, thanks. (I don=E2=80=99t currently plan upgrading my Emacs instance before early next week, thus I won=E2=80=99t be able to test them myself until then either.) --=20 FSF associate member #7257 http://boycottsystemd.org/ =E2=80=A6 3013 B6A0= 230E 334A From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 29 15:32:12 2014 Received: (at 18778-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Oct 2014 19:32:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39352 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XjYyZ-0002qt-R3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 15:32:12 -0400 Received: from fely.am-1.org ([78.47.74.50]:37962) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XjYyX-0002qj-EQ for 18778-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 15:32:10 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=siamics.net; s=a2013295; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:Sender:References:Subject:To:From; bh=wekLWDzBiuViYPKKIB0+5bG4SPu5VOaLHRFQcjlVGww=; b=ge/7/tAnVSpv54mMykZGRfdczJ50KR+fhks3Jb3148Q/Nw+yF4K4rgYdWBcEUO0Xq0iVNtUWcotBwBYIjDRDLpPSnRP4a44kt8Z4GrtBj6QHkYLDfdNM/3xqAtroLCkG9NZyHYaEaV70+gapwugdclK2y4DHK9yw2jy5l1uqJ4I=; Received: from [2a02:2560:6d4:26ca::1:1d] (helo=violet.siamics.net) by fely.am-1.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XjYyV-0004it-J1 for 18778-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 19:32:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=violet.siamics.net) by violet.siamics.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XjYyO-0000vw-Gw for 18778-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 02:32:00 +0700 From: Ivan Shmakov To: 18778-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#18778: noticeable slowdown for buffers with long lines, word-wrap, and brackets References: <834mv55quj.fsf@gnu.org> <87wq7ur1o7.fsf@violet.siamics.net> <83k33ubkp3.fsf@gnu.org> <87lhoar03i.fsf@violet.siamics.net> <83oat484od.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 19:31:59 +0000 In-Reply-To: <83oat484od.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 22 Oct 2014 19:12:02 +0300") Message-ID: <87vbn2ad00.fsf@violet.siamics.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 18778-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) >>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes: > In trunk revision 118179 I introduced an optimization that fixes > these situations. As of 4fd1634dbdd8, I no longer observe this issue, thus closing this bug. Thanks again. --=20 FSF associate member #7257 http://boycottsystemd.org/ =E2=80=A6 3013 B6A0= 230E 334A From unknown Sat Aug 09 18:41:47 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 12:24:03 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator