GNU bug report logs - #18766
25.0.50; eldoc (after commit fb9dbc05a3ca0b3e69afd5b061c84c3802086834)

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Dmitriy Igrishin <dmitigr <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 18:39:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: notabug

Found in version 25.0.50

Done: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Dmitriy Igrishin <dmitigr <at> gmail.com>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: 18766 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#18766: 25.0.50; eldoc (after commit fb9dbc05a3ca0b3e69afd5b061c84c3802086834)
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 00:02:32 +0400
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
2014-10-20 6:40 GMT+04:00 Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>:

> >   eldoc-documentation-function-default()
>
> Problem is: "grep" tells me that "eldoc-documentation-function-default"
> does not appear anywhere in Emacs's `trunk' code.
>
> Could it be that you have some old file getting in the way somewhere?
> Maybe a "make bootstrap" is needed?
>
I keep source and build directories of Emacs separately. (The build
directory is not a subdir of the source tree.) And  from time to time I
rebuild Emacs by invoking:
make && sudo make install.
I've "grepped" for "eldoc-documentation-function-default" in my
*source* tree and found *binary* matches. (Probably, sometime
I've invoke make in the source directory.)
Thus, I am clean the source tree and rebuild Emacs. The problem
is gone, so it is mea culpa, rather than bug. Sorry!
But this is a question. Why "make install" invoked in the
*build* directory after updating the source tree messed up the
installation?
Thanks!


-- 
// Dmitriy.
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 10 years and 271 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.