GNU bug report logs - #18762
[PATCH] dfa: don't consider RE_DOT_NEWLINE and RE_DOT_NOT_NULL in matching with a bracket expression

Previous Next

Package: grep;

Reported by: Norihiro Tanaka <noritnk <at> kcn.ne.jp>

Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 12:41:03 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Jim Meyering <jim <at> meyering.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #25 received at 18762-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jim Meyering <jim <at> meyering.net>
To: Norihiro Tanaka <noritnk <at> kcn.ne.jp>
Cc: 18762-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#18762: [PATCH] dfa: don't consider RE_DOT_NEWLINE and
 RE_DOT_NOT_NULL in matching with a bracket expression
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 20:16:09 -0700
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 6:24 PM, Jim Meyering <jim <at> meyering.net> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Norihiro Tanaka <noritnk <at> kcn.ne.jp> wrote:
>> Jim Meyering <jim <at> meyering.net> wrote:
>>> dfa.c's match_mb_charset function *is* used, e.g., in a
>>> command like this one:
>>>
>>>   printf '\0' |src/grep -aE '^\s?$'
>>
>> Wow, just it isn't good.  I think that behavior of `fails' should be
>> same as of `trans' except `fails' checks accepted conditions, including
>> following part.  match_mb_charset() should be avoided as far as possible,
>> as it doesn't support collating symbols and equivalence classes.
>>
>>>               /* Falling back to the glibc matcher in this case gives
>>>                  better performance (up to 25% better on [a-z], for
>>>                  example) and enables support for collating symbols and
>>>                  equivalence classes.  */
>>>               if (d->states[s].has_mbcset && backref)
>>>                 {
>>>                   *backref = 1;
>>>                   goto done;
>>>                 }
>
> Nice change.  I've adjusted the commit log and added the test
> above, since no other code even excercised the
> now-inaccessible function. I will push it tomorrow.

By the way, I've also adjusted your preceding patch (see attached),
and will push it tomorrow, too.
[0001-dfa-remove-two-erroneous-clauses-from-a-now-unused-f.patch (application/octet-stream, attachment)]

This bug report was last modified 10 years and 277 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.