Subject: bug#18656: closed (Re: bug#18656: 25.0.50; (defun temp-buffer-window-show (&optional buffer action) ....))

From: [email-masked] (GNU bug Tracking System)
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 12:42:03 +0000

Your bug report

#18656: 25.0.50; (defun temp-buffer-window-show (&optional buffer action) ....)

which was filed against the emacs package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to [email-masked].

-- 
18656: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=18656
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact [email-masked] with problems

Subject: Re: bug#18656: 25.0.50; (defun temp-buffer-window-show (&optional buffer action) ....)
From: Leo Liu <[email-masked]>
To: martin rudalics <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 20:41:35 +0800
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>

version: 25.1

On 2014-10-10 11:03 +0200, martin rudalics wrote:
> Yes.  Please do that.
> Thanks, martin

Done.

Leo

Subject: 25.0.50; (defun temp-buffer-window-show (&optional buffer action) ....)
From: Leo Liu <[email-masked]>
To: [email-masked]
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 23:32:24 +0800
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>

BUFFER is actually a required argument. Shouldn't the lambda-list be
written as:

(defun temp-buffer-window-show (buffer &optional action) .....)

Leo